Global White Population to Plummet to Single Digit—Black Population to Double

[quatrotritikali]

I couldn't claim anywhere close to 40 women. Even if we just count oral sex.

I've actually had sex with well over 60 guys in my lifetime, including oral sex...and didn't have to pay for any of it. Of course, gay folk are more promiscuous than the breeder type, and we seem to enjoy sex more.

 

[americanwoman]

I've actually had sex with well over 60 guys in my lifetime, including oral sex...and didn't have to pay for any of it. Of course, gay folk are more promiscuous than the breeder type, and we seem to enjoy sex more.

How do you even keep track of that many? Do you keep a list or something? I have trouble remembering all mine and my number is still in the single digits.

 

[Infinite Chaos]

Global White Population to Plummet to Single Digit--snip--

I've actually had sex with well over 60 guys in my lifetime--snip-- gay folk are more promiscuous --snip--

Do you think you could pass some sex tips over to our National Socialist friend? Sounds like her organisations could do with some advice.

 

[quatrotritikali]

How do you even keep track of that many? Do you keep a list or something? I have trouble remembering all mine and my number is still in the single digits.

It's hard to keep track of the guys one has sex with, for sure. I used to keep the "little black book" of names and addresses...and if it was anonymous sex, I would just jot down the date and the word "u/k" (for unknown). :mrgreen:

I've had sex with guys at gay bars, whom I've gone home with from bars, off the street, in back alleys (in San Francisco), guys I've picked up while I was a cab driver in Dallas, guys from social events, a couple of guys I've met via the internet, while crossing the country in my car, at rest stops along Interstates, in a bathroom stall at a bus station, in adult video booths, in various parks, on the beach in San Francisco, in Golden Gate Park, etc. I've "known" quite a variety of guys, actually.

Not all encounters involved safe sex. But I have been careful...and am HIV negative and STD-free, still (knock on wood).

 

[Gipper]

Damn Darwin. Kick in already!

 

[quatrotritikali]

Damn Darwin. Kick in already!

Ahh...poor Gipper. Darwin has kicked in...didn't you know? Gays are proof that the strongest survive. WE WILL SURVIVE. We have survived, and we are going to survive...long after homophobes, bigots and sexless breeders the world over fade away. Keep that in mind.

 

[rathi]

Who cares? The racial breakdown of the planet isn't important. Overpopulation however is, and something needs to done to reduce world birthrates. Africa, South America and certain parts of Asia need to reduce population rates. One thing I will give China credit for is for at least understanding the problem and working to fix it, although sometimes they use inhumane methods.

 

[WI Crippler]

Ahh...poor Gipper. Darwin has kicked in...didn't you know? Gays are proof that the strongest survive. WE WILL SURVIVE. We have survived, and we are going to survive...long after homophobes, bigots and sexless breeders the world over fade away. Keep that in mind.

Because gays aren't bigotted at all, especially towards "breeders". Damn heterophobes. :2razz:

 

[Jray]

Excuse me? WTF are you talking about? White folk do NOT lead the pack in conquest and dominion. You really need to read up on the Arabs and the hordes of African blacks, who are conquering, pillaging and dominating in their own countries.

Just because the Anglo-Saxon race gained dominance long time ago, does not mean the race is bad or evil in some way. I find the white race to be probably the most generous, compassionate, and caring race on the face of the Earth.

If it were not for the white race, society would not be nearly as advanced as it is now.

That post belong overhere

 

[Sergeant Stinger1]

Global White Population to Plummet to Single Digit—Black Population to Double

The big population story of the 21st Century is shaping up to be the status reversal of whites and blacks and the Indian baby boom
As a percentage of world inhabitants, the white population will plummet to a single digit (9.76%) by 2060 from a high-water mark of 27.98% in 1950.

Using 2010 as the base reference, the big gainer in the population derby will be blacks or sub-Sahara Africans. This group will expand almost 133% to 2.7 billion by 2060. By the middle of this century blacks will represent 25.38% of world population, which is up dramatically from the 8.97% they recorded in 1950.

The other groups measured in the study were the Central Asians (Indians), East Asians (Chinese and Japanese), the Southeast Asians, Arabic (North Africa and the Middle East), and Amerindian-Mestizo (Mexican and Central America). All these groups will experience a population growth. The Chinese/Japanese and Indians will trade rankings and the relative global presence of the other groups will remain more or less constant.

The big population story of the 21st Century is shaping up to be the status reversal of whites and blacks and the Indian baby boom. A side bar will be the single digit minority role that whites will assume. Of the 7 population groups studied, only whites are projected to sustain an absolute decline in numbers.

In 1950 whites and blacks were respectively 27.98% and 8.97% of world population. By 2060 these figures will almost reverse as blacks surge to 25.38% and whites shrink to 9.76%. From 2010 the white population will decline while blacks will add 1.2 billion to their numbers. In this time frame the the Indian subcontinent will gain 1.2 billion people. These groups and their governments will be looking for elbow room, and the diminished presence of whites in Europe, and especially in the relatively wide open spaces North America, will provide such an opportunity. Specifically, countries like Canada, the United States, Argentina, Brazil, Australia, New Zealand, and Russia can expect to be pressured to accept collectively hundreds of millions of refugees from India, and sub-Sahara Africa.

(Click on link below to get your free copy of the report)

National Policy Institute - Publications

-
Could be! Whites HATE each other Blacks seem to stick together!
-
BTW: If you are the owner of Wendys can I have a snack attack, fries and a coke please?
I'll pay you later!

 

[quatrotritikali]

That post belong overhere

I've already visited that website, Jray. I actually talked with one of the site owners, as well as some teenager. After telling them I was gay, and that I thought their views towards gays was despicable...they got a bit frosty with me, although...to their credit...they continued to speak to me until I got tired of them and let them be. :roll: Oh btw...how do YOU know about this site?

And I do not appreciate the indirect insinuation that I am somehow racist towards black folk.

 

[Caine]

And I do not appreciate the indirect insinuation that I am somehow racist towards black folk.

Its not that quat, you didn't agree with 10's post, so you MUST agree with those Stormfront racist fags.

Apparently there is no in-between for the Reparations advocates...:roll:

 

[quatrotritikali]

Its not that quat, you didn't agree with 10's post, so you MUST agree with those Stormfront racist fags.

Apparently there is no in-between for the Reparations advocates...:roll:

I guess not.

 

[Jray]

I've already visited that website, Jray. I actually talked with one of the site owners, as well as some teenager. After telling them I was gay, and that I thought their views towards gays was despicable...they got a bit frosty with me, although...to their credit...they continued to speak to me until I got tired of them and let them be. :roll: Oh btw...how do YOU know about this site?

And I do not appreciate the indirect insinuation that I am somehow racist towards black folk.

Sorry if I took phrases like "white people need to have more babies," "blacks are humping like shithouse rats" and "I find the white race to be probably the most generous, compassionate, and caring race on the face of the Earth" to sound like white supremacy.

But do you really think white people don't lead the pack in conquest? Colonization of the entire world says otherwise.

 

[1069]

Sorry if I took phrases like "white people need to have more babies," "blacks are humping like shithouse rats" and "I find the white race to be probably the most generous, compassionate, and caring race on the face of the Earth" to sound like white supremacy.

But do you really think white people don't lead the pack in conquest? Colonization of the entire world says otherwise.

No; most whites just think we're better at it.
They think other races would've done it too, but they're just inept at it.
Few recognize the truth.
The truth hurts them, I guess.

 

[Marilyn Monroe]

You really believe that every white man is a conquerer, every african runs around killing entire villages with his sword and rapes women after cutting their breasts off and that every arab is a beheader?

Wow :shock:

Violence is not related to race, it is related to humanity.

Humanity is brutal and violent to a large degree, nothing to do with race, we are all one race anyway.

We really need to educate all people about birth control, and sterilization. Why have kids that are going to starve before your eyes? Makes no sense. This is brutality to me.

 

[quatrotritikali]

Sorry if I took phrases like "white people need to have more babies," "blacks are humping like shithouse rats" and "I find the white race to be probably the most generous, compassionate, and caring race on the face of the Earth" to sound like white supremacy.

But do you really think white people don't lead the pack in conquest? Colonization of the entire world says otherwise.

Why is it that agitators and race-baiters always use the same tired ploys? White folk DO need to have more children, if they are to maintain their status as a viable race. While the rest of the civilized world's population rates are either in decline or have stagnated, especially in Europe, the Africans (as well as Indians and some Asians) are busy procreating and having lots of children. These children, for the most part, go around starving because there is not enough food in their land to sustain them or the parents who conceived them...yet procreative sex continues at an alarming rate in Third World African countries. And yes, the white race seems to be the most generous, compassionate, and caring race on the face of the Earth. And like 1069 posted, whites believe they have been better at global conquest and advancing civilizaton.
I see nothing wrong with my statements. I simply take some pride in my ancestry and my race. I certainly don't go around wearing White Pride shirts or anything like that (although if blacks can wear Malcolm X shirts, Black Power shirts, etc. I suppose I should be able to wear White Pride shirts).

 

[Jray]

Why is it that agitators and race-baiters always use the same tired ploys? White folk DO need to have more children, if they are to maintain their status as a viable race.

Why is it important that the white "race" lives on? Does it matter if any population decreases naturally?

Whites also tend to cluster towards first world nations where consumption is very high. Could the world even support a dramatic increase in the size of the first (mainly white) world population?

While the rest of the civilized world's population rates are either in decline or have stagnated, especially in Europe, the Africans (as well as Indians and some Asians) are busy procreating and having lots of children. These children, for the most part, go around starving because there is not enough food in their land to sustain them or the parents who conceived them...yet procreative sex continues at an alarming rate in Third World African countries.

So rather than introduce contraception to prevent the overpopulation of LDCs your answer is for white people to have more babies? How does the size of the white population affect what happens in Africa?

And yes, the white race seems to be the most generous, compassionate, and caring race on the face of the Earth. And like 1069 posted, whites believe they have been better at global conquest and advancing civilizaton.

Explain how they have been the most generous. Looks like your lost deep within the white racial frame.

I see nothing wrong with my statements. I simply take some pride in my ancestry and my race. I certainly don't go around wearing White Pride shirts or anything like that (although if blacks can wear Malcolm X shirts, Black Power shirts, etc. I suppose I should be able to wear White Pride shirts).

There is nothing wrong with White people being proud of who they are but there are reasons why it tends to be interpreted as supremacist. History is a hard animal to run away from.

 

[1069]

Who cares? The racial breakdown of the planet isn't important.

Exactly.
White blood, elements of white culture and history, and many caucasian genetic characteristics will never die out, even if there were not a single pure-blooded caucasian child born ever again.

Whites (and, admittedly, some blacks, too) only think the product of a racially mixed union is "black". We treat them like they're black; we call them "black". But in truth, they are equally as white as they are black.

I don't care about the amount of melanin in my descendants' skin or the texture of their hair. They will still be my descendants. I hope they'll be gifted with words, and love animals. If I could specify which genetic gifts to bequeath to my descendants, I would choose gifts of health and longevity and intellect.
My straight hair and pale skin are not the characteristics I find it most important that my descendants receive.
Look at Mexicans and South Americans, how they've incorporated elements from their Spanish European ancestors and their Native American ancestors, and created a whole new culture that is an amalgamation of these two wildly different heritages.
Although their skin tone isn't as pale (in most cases) as that of a full-blooded European, their hispano/ latin heritage is still very much in evidence in their language and history, religion and culture. It hasn't gone away.

 

[quatrotritikali]

Why is it important that the white "race" lives on? Does it matter if any population decreases naturally?

As a white person, I think it is extremely important that the white race live on....or at least not to die out completely. For selfish reasons, I'm rather fond of my white skin. And my sexual partners tend to be either white or Asian.

Whites also tend to cluster towards first world nations where consumption is very high. Could the world even support a dramatic increase in the size of the first (mainly white) world population?[/QUOTE]

Consumption is very high among first world nations...because they need more to sustain their populations. And it is first world nations that have ultimately realized the ecological and environmental dangers that their society produces...AND are now taking steps to correct the damage and to live a more sustainable life. I don't see any Third World nations doing anything on their own to better themselves in any way....their population numbers are increasing dramatically, yet they cannot feed themselves, maintain their health, etc. Like in Zimbabwe, people like Mugabe took white owners' land and turned it over to the black citizens. Why? The blacks couldn't operate the equipment to maintain the fertile fields that their very food came from. Blacks there did not have the skills or expertise to sustain themselves. What food was grown was confiscated by the govt. and given to govt. officials and political hacks of Mugabe. Where did this illegal land grab and driving out of the whites get the black citizens? They have no food, no clean water to drink, no health system, no education system...and they are ignorant. Africa has been given assistance and support for years, with only sporadic positive results. Imagine a world run that way. Technology would stagnate or disappear, and society would revert to some relatively primitive existance.

So rather than introduce contraception to prevent the overpopulation of LDCs your answer is for white people to have more babies? How does the size of the white population affect what happens in Africa?

I never said that whites should have more babies to prevent overpopulation of LDCs, but that whites, or Caucasians, should reproduce to maintain their own race, for gawd's sake! And at the rate things are going in Africa today, white people may be the African's only hope of survival...as the blacks in Africa, overall, cannot survive and thrive on their own.

There is nothing wrong with White people being proud of who they are but there are reasons why it tends to be interpreted as supremacist. History is a hard animal to run away from.

I could give a rat's butt about what others might think. People are going to believe what they will...there ain't no changing that. If I am a supremacist because I am white, and have a fondness and a desire to see the white race thrive, then so be it. It is my heritage, and my culture...which is just as important as any other race's.

 

[Jray]

As a white person, I think it is extremely important that the white race live on....or at least not to die out completely. For selfish reasons, I'm rather fond of my white skin. And my sexual partners tend to be either white or Asian.

It's not like the white race is a biological reality anyway. What defines the "white race"? White skin? Thin nose? Straight hair?

Consumption is very high among first world nations...because they need more to sustain their populations. And it is first world nations that have ultimately realized the ecological and environmental dangers that their society produces...AND are now taking steps to correct the damage and to live a more sustainable life.

Since when does an American need 32 times more than a Kenyan to survive? The first world could survive fine with a lower consumption rate, it just doesn't want to cut its wastfull consumption.

I don't see any Third World nations doing anything on their own to better themselves in any way....their population numbers are increasing dramatically, yet they cannot feed themselves, maintain their health, etc. Like in Zimbabwe, people like Mugabe took white owners' land and turned it over to the black citizens. Why? The blacks couldn't operate the equipment to maintain the fertile fields that their very food came from. Blacks there did not have the skills or expertise to sustain themselves. What food was grown was confiscated by the govt. and given to govt. officials and political hacks of Mugabe. Where did this illegal land grab and driving out of the whites get the black citizens? They have no food, no clean water to drink, no health system, no education system...and they are ignorant. Africa has been given assistance and support for years, with only sporadic positive results. Imagine a world run that way. Technology would stagnate or disappear, and society would revert to some relatively primitive existance.

Yet Africa we see to day is the result of European imperialism. Yea that generous white race that decided to bleed out the rest of the world for its gain.

I never said that whites should have more babies to prevent overpopulation of LDCs, but that whites, or Caucasians, should reproduce to maintain their own race, for gawd's sake! And at the rate things are going in Africa today, white people may be the African's only hope of survival...as the blacks in Africa, overall, cannot survive and thrive on their own.

So why the **** mention Africans "humping like shithouse rats"? How is maintaining ones own race even a feasible goal? Phenotypes gradually change over time, your descendants could end up being 7 feet tall and black. ****, I should take offense to that last line, Africa was fine before white people got there.

I could give a rat's butt about what others might think. People are going to believe what they will...there ain't no changing that. If I am a supremacist because I am white, and have a fondness and a desire to see the white race thrive, then so be it. It is my heritage, and my culture...which is just as important as any other race's.

Just leave the other races alone then.

 

[quatrotritikali]

It's not like the white race is a biological reality anyway. What defines the "white race"? White skin? Thin nose? Straight hair?

Since when does an American need 32 times more than a Kenyan to survive? The first world could survive fine with a lower consumption rate, it just doesn't want to cut its wastfull consumption.

Yet Africa we see to day is the result of European imperialism. Yea that generous white race that decided to bleed out the rest of the world for its gain.

So why the **** mention Africans "humping like shithouse rats"? How is maintaining ones own race even a feasible goal? Phenotypes gradually change over time, your descendants could end up being 7 feet tall and black. ****, I should take offense to that last line, Africa was fine before white people got there.

Just leave the other races alone then.

Are you non-Caucasian? I'm not bothering any other races dude, so get a life of your own, and stop the race-baiting. Americans might not NEED 32 times as much consumption, but we have it and I'm okay with that. It's amazing how the poorer and less advanced a society, the more angry they are when others have it. Non-whites (with the possible exception of certain Asian cultures) are always harping on whites...placing blame on them for everything wrong with the world today. Never mind that the so-called white "atrocities" took place a very long time ago. Sorta like American blacks wanting whites to pay them slave reparations. That is bullcrap...and they won't see a dime from me. These people are beating a very dead horse.

It is not America's responsibility or obligation to support other countries and ensure they can live "the American Dream". The United States gives more than any other nation in the world. Too many other countries think that America "owes" them something...and that just isn't the case.

Africa was fine before white colonization? Excuse me, but European Imperialism is what brought what technology and advancements there are in many of these poor mud hole countries. Otherwise, Africa would still be nothing but warring jungle tribes. Imperialism did bring some good things to an otherwise destitute and barren continent. And once again, Western Imperialism has gone the way of the once mighty British Empire. And what has happened to the former British Crown colonies? Not much....:roll:

 

[Jray]

Africa was fine before white colonization? Excuse me, but European Imperialism is what brought what technology and advancements there are in many of these poor mud hole countries. Otherwise, Africa would still be nothing but warring jungle tribes. Imperialism did bring some good things to an otherwise destitute and barren continent. And once again, Western Imperialism has gone the way of the once mighty British Empire. And what has happened to the former British Crown colonies? Not much....:roll:

Yea cause Great Zimbabwe, Mali, Songhai and the Zulu kingdom were nothing. ****, European script has African origins. Hell, where would Europeans be if Africans had never brought farming to them? **** you want to talk about the benefits of imperialism, what was Europe like before the Romans conquered it?

 

[Hatuey]

Africa was fine before white colonization? Excuse me, but European Imperialism is what brought what technology and advancements there are in many of these poor mud hole countries. Otherwise, Africa would still be nothing but warring jungle tribes. Imperialism did bring some good things to an otherwise destitute and barren continent. And once again, Western Imperialism has gone the way of the once mighty British Empire. And what has happened to the former British Crown colonies? Not much....:roll:

Well I for one am thankful the white man decided to bring all that technology and advancements to poor old Africa. And to think he did all this and all he "got" in "exchange" was precious stones, metals and 300 years worth of slaves. Poor white man. I think Africans got a good deal out of this. I mean....seriously Africans. Why would you hold the chronic 500 year rape of your land against white people? Seriously Africans. It's not like white minorities didn't keep a lot of you oppressed till the 90s(South Africa). I mean it's not like you were being treated as second class citizens in the lands of your ancestors. The white man did this all for your own good. It's not like those whites who basically owned your countries up until a few decades ago had anything to gain from oppressing the majorities they and their ancestors had kept ignorant for hundreds of years. You're soooooooo wrong in hating whites.

In case you haven't figured it out. I'm being sarcastic. 1) Because racism is never justified but in some cases it's understandable and 2) Because you obviously believe blacks ow the "white race" for bringing advancements and technology to their lands at the "simple" expense of destroying their cultures and raping their lands for hundreds of years. Sorry.

 

[Marilyn Monroe]

Well I for one am thankful the white man decided to bring all that technology and advancements to poor old Africa. And to think he did all this and all he "got" in "exchange" was precious stones, metals and 300 years worth of slaves. Poor white man. I think Africans got a good deal out of this. I mean....seriously Africans. Why would you hold the chronic 500 year rape of your land against white people? Seriously Africans. It's not like white minorities didn't keep a lot of you oppressed till the 90s(South Africa). I mean it's not like you were being treated as second class citizens in the lands of your ancestors. The white man did this all for your own good. It's not like those whites who basically owned your countries up until a few decades ago had anything to gain from oppressing the majorities they and their ancestors had kept ignorant for hundreds of years. You're soooooooo wrong in hating whites.

This is sarcasm that is leaving a whole lot of history out of the picture.

In case you haven't figured it out. I'm being sarcastic. 1) Because racism is never justified but in some cases it's understandable and 2) Because you obviously believe blacks ow the "white race" for bringing advancements and technology to their lands at the "simple" expense of destroying their cultures and raping their lands for hundreds of years. Sorry.

The technology has also saved lives and brought hope to many. There's been good and bad from all sides in the history of man. I think the good has outweighed the bad.