- Joined
- Feb 3, 2006
- Messages
- 3,379
- Reaction score
- 161
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
this is your source:jfuh said:Why do I not find this statment the least bit surprising? Perhaps because you have absolutely nothing as a source that is relevant to the argument and I've easily shown how you're arguments are completely irrelevant.
Oh and by the way, here's a http://www.mindfully.org/Air/2003/Pentagon-Climate-Change1oct03.htm"]DOD report titled [/URL] on Global warming as well. Here's the pdf version in case you'd like to print it out.
As well as a DOD ="https://www.denix.osd.mil/denix/Public/Library/Climate/docs.html"]webpage that you can educate yourself on this matter.
Imagining the Unthinkable
The purpose of this report is to imagine the unthinkable – to push the boundaries of current research on climate change so we may better understand the potential implications on United States national security.
We have interviewed leading climate change scientists, conducted additional research, and reviewed several iterations of the scenario with these experts. The scientists support this project, but caution that the scenario depicted is extreme in two fundamental ways. First, they suggest the occurrences we outline would most likely happen in a few regions, rather than on globally. Second, they say the magnitude of the event may be considerably smaller.
We have created a climate change scenario that although not the most likely, is plausible, and would challenge United States national security in ways that should be considered immediately.
This is Pentagon. They have to have scenarios for nuclear wars, too.
Then you cry about ""plans"" of using nukes in Iran. No, jfuh , you have absolutely nothing as a source that is relevant to the argument and you yourself easily show how you're arguments are completely irrelevant.