• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Global Warming: The Other Side

I don't know about this.
 
The ex-weather channel guy thinks the "AGW SCAM!" is a plot to promote a world government.
 
Coleman makes a good point as relates to SOME AGW proponents. But not all proponents. Certainly there are those One-Worlders out there who see an opportunity exists in this issue. But the majority of support falls under a wide range of targetted and/or misguided agendas, from those in world leadership who mistakenly see an opportunity to drain away US prosperity to the benefit of the developing world, to those who are concerned by the scientific data, to those who go bonkers imagining all manner of catastrophy that cannot be intelligently assumed. Experts like Dr. James Hansen often teeter between the last two types, which only shows even the most learned and intelligent amongst us are not immune to irrational hysteria.

Overall, the mainstream of today's climate change advocacy is a fraud. But I have no problem with any economically efficient effort to clean up our toxic emissions.
 
Well thank you. I see the GW nutters trying to paint someone like Coleman as a nutter himself. As if he is wildly screaming about vast conspiracy. But he is only shedding light on some dangerous elements of a flawed global promotion.
 
Telecaster said:
Well thank you. I see the GW nutters trying to paint someone like Coleman as a nutter himself. As if he is wildly screaming about vast conspiracy. But he is only shedding light on some dangerous elements of a flawed global promotion.
Click to expand...

If you are not 100% behind the theory that AGW is going to burn up this blue ball of ours, then you are obviously one or more of the following:

1. Paid by big oil.
2. Too stupid to understand the issue.
3. Greedy and don't care about the "children".
4. A crackpot gun nut that fears false claims of government power.
5. Paid by big business.
 
Manc Skipper said:
The ex-weather channel guy thinks the "AGW SCAM!" is a plot to promote a world government.
Click to expand...

The AGW Scam IS a plot to expand government.

It has no validity, it's failed science, so what else could it be, since the governments are still pushing it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom