- Joined
- Aug 26, 2007
- Messages
- 50,241
- Reaction score
- 19,243
- Location
- San Antonio Texas
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
This date in 1934 may have been the hottest in US history. The map below shows actual temperatures, not the “heat index.” Almost two-thirds of the US was over 100F on July 21, 1934 – with temperatures of 115 in Missouri and South Dakota, and 113 in Minnesota.
Why do you hate Gaia?
Cause, Gaia hates me.
Yeah, 'cause the overwhelming majority of the world's scientists have all gotten together to make it look like the world's getting warmer! And nearly all climatologists got together and knowingly falsified the temperatures!
And best of all, the hundreds of climatologists and the hundreds of thousands of scientists worldwide that are ALL in on this conspiracy have been able to keep it secret from the rest of the world! Amaaaaaaaaazing!
Yeah, 'cause the overwhelming majority of the world's scientists have all gotten together to make it look like the world's getting warmer! And nearly all climatologists got together and knowingly falsified the temperatures!
And best of all, the hundreds of climatologists and the hundreds of thousands of scientists worldwide that are ALL in on this conspiracy have been able to keep it secret from the rest of the world! Amaaaaaaaaazing!
They could just want to be relevant or get money from government grants? :roll:
Yeah, 'cause the overwhelming majority of the world's scientists have all gotten together to make it look like the world's getting warmer! And nearly all climatologists got together and knowingly falsified the temperatures!
And best of all, the hundreds of climatologists and the hundreds of thousands of scientists worldwide that are ALL in on this conspiracy have been able to keep it secret from the rest of the world! Amaaaaaaaaazing!
Riiiiiiight. Your inference would require that doggone near every climatologist MUST have government grants in order to work, and would require that NOT A SINGLE ONE OF THE GREAT MAJORITY OF CLIMATOLOGISTS has the intestinal fortitude to expose the grand conspiracy...never mind that the moment even one of them spoke up, he'd be an instant celebrity on Fox and wouldn't have to work again a day in his life.
But I guess in your world, the scientists are all cowards - they're not Real Men like Trump, Limbaugh, Cheney, and Ted Nugent, all of whom used various bogus claims to get out of military service.
Riiiiiiight. Your inference would require that doggone near every climatologist MUST have government grants in order to work, and would require that NOT A SINGLE ONE OF THE GREAT MAJORITY OF CLIMATOLOGISTS has the intestinal fortitude to expose the grand conspiracy...never mind that the moment even one of them spoke up, he'd be an instant celebrity on Fox and wouldn't have to work again a day in his life.
But I guess in your world, the scientists are all cowards - they're not Real Men like Trump, Limbaugh, Cheney, and Ted Nugent, all of whom used various bogus claims to get out of military service.
Please get that wad undone from your panties.
How about them not wanting to turn their collective backs on their political agenda?
You really don't get why grand conspiracy theories are almost never, ever real, do you?
It's not a CT... it's an political agenda. It's the way the left works.
Here's a bunch that were true.
33 Conspiracy Theories That Turned Out To Be True, What Every Person Should Know... » Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!
It was only last month that climate scientists were saying that May was the hottest month, and before that it was April! Now it's June! I wish they would make up their minds!
I am not sure if global temperatures are mostly fake, but they sure don't mean what people think they do.
The majority of the observed warming has been in winter (cooler months) evenings.
So the average is increasing because of the winter nights not getting as cold as they used to.
Wrong. Your claim REQUIRES that the overwhelming majority of the world's climatologists are deliberately falsifying their measurements and deliberately misleading the rest of us...and that they're so well-organized and dedicated that not a single one of them has had the moral courage, the intestinal fortitude to speak up and expose it...even though the moment one did so, he or she would be an instant celebrity and would never have to work again a day in his or her life.
That, sir, is by definition a conspiracy theory.
Obviously warmer evenings and nights is a distinctive indication that the main cause is greenhouse gases retaining daytime heat (not daytime effects like a hotter sun or fewer clouds blocking sunlight or whatever other half-baked theories some 'sceptics' cling to).
Similarly hotter winter months specifically - and in the Northern Hemisphere especially, as you've pointed out before - indicate the feedback mechanism of reduced albedo from faster and earlier snow melt, further amplifying the initial GHG warming.
These are important things to point out. Summers and days are getting hotter too of course, but at a slower rate.
No. The claim is that there are a few such out right liars and that the general media of the world and it's governments are going along with this convenient lie. That there are lots of parties who get a lot out of this lie.
There are plenty of scientists who disagree with this and lots lots more who have come to phrasing there results very carefully.
In case you have not noticed us skeptics often use sceintifc papers to support our arguments. Loads of links to such.
This is obvious if :
There are plenty of scientists who disagree with this and lots lots more who have come to phrasing there results very carefully.
Actually James Hansen and other Scientist disagree, Hansen thought that T-Min and T-Max should rise the same but that T Max was dampened,Obviously warmer evenings and nights is a distinctive indication that the main cause is greenhouse gases retaining daytime heat (not daytime effects like a hotter sun or fewer clouds blocking sunlight or whatever other half-baked theories some 'sceptics' cling to).
Similarly hotter winter months specifically - and in the Northern Hemisphere especially, as you've pointed out before - indicate the feedback mechanism of reduced albedo from faster and earlier snow melt, further amplifying the initial GHG warming.
These are important things to point out. Summers and days are getting hotter too of course, but at a slower rate.
Also the winter warming is not just the northern Hemisphere but both.We can safely predict that on the long run the effect of the diurnal damping on maximum temperatures will be small,
Actually James Hansen and other Scientist disagree, Hansen thought that T-Min and T-Max should rise the same but that T Max was dampened,
and that that dampening was temporary.
http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1995/1995_Hansen_ha09800r.pdf
We can safely predict that on the long run the effect of the diurnal damping on maximum temperatures will be small,
Also the winter warming is not just the northern Hemisphere but both.
Read Arrhenius's opening statement from 1896, Tyndail, thought the effect would only cause diurnal and seasonal variations.
http://www.rsc.org/images/Arrhenius1896_tcm18-173546.pdf
What do we see today? seasonal and diurnal variations.
While this may not mean that added CO2 is not an issue, it reduces the severity of the issue, and throws all the models off.
If the evenings in the cooled months are not as cold as they used to be by 1 or 2 C, over 180 years, it could effect which variety
of orchard species are planted for the next rotation, and other chill hour plants.
Warming (K) Warming (K)
NH winter (DJF) 1 SH winter (JJA) 0.688
NH autumn 0.933 SH autumn 0.655
NH summer (JJA) 0.754 SH summer (DJF) 0.649
NH spring 0.817 SH spring 0.606
Warming (K)
64N-90N 2.02
44N-64N 1.161
24N-44N 0.736
EQU-24N 0.626
24S-EQU 0.692
44S-24S 0.667
64S-44S 0.482
90S-64S 0.473
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?