Global Cooling Is Under Way

[calamity]

Why?

The proof will present itself in 10 years or less.

You’re 100% right but in the opposite direction.

 

[Jack Hays]

:lol:


Told ya

As did I.

 

[calamity]

As did I.

I suggest you look up the word "pause." Hint: it's not a sudden 20% jump in temperature. :roll:

 

[Jack Hays]

I suggest you look up the word "pause." Hint: it's not a sudden 20% jump in temperature. :roll:

As I have said from early in this thread, an occasional El Nino will pause the cooling trend. And a one-year bump up is exactly that, a pause. Cooling resumes in 2020.

 

[Lord of Planar]

You’re 100% right but in the opposite direction.

Will you still be around then?

 

[calamity]

Will you still be around then?

I'll be around next week, when we see a 50 degree Christmas day, in freaking Ohio. Let's face it. The earth is not "cooling."

But, it has saved me from driving 600 miles to warm weather in December.

 

[Lord of Planar]

I suggest you look up the word "pause." Hint: it's not a sudden 20% jump in temperature. :roll:

We would be hurting with a 20% increase in temperature.

288 x 0.2 = 47.6

A 47+ increase in warning would be very damaging.

Where is that at?

 

[Lord of Planar]

I'll be around next week, when we see a 50 degree Christmas day, in freaking Ohio. Let's face it. The earth is not "cooling."

But, it has saved me from driving 600 miles to warm weather in December.

Whoop-te-do...

I don't know where in Ohio you are speaking of, but the Christams day high from Columbus was 64F in 1893. There have been three days 50F or higher. Five days 40F to 49F.

Do you have a valid point?

Christmas Day Climatology and White Christmas Probability

 

[calamity]

We would be hurting with a 20% increase in temperature.

288 x 0.2 = 47.6

A 47+ increase in warning would be very damaging.

Where is that at?

:roll:

Correction 20% jump in temperature anomaly.

 

[Threegoofs]

Why?

The proof will present itself in 10 years or less.

And by that time, you’ll have cooked up some other BS denier theory...

 

[Lord of Planar]

:roll:

Correction 20% jump in temperature anomaly.

Oh...

An ambiguous number, which means the 20% is scientifically meaningless. It will change with the given baseline.

You really should comprehend basic science if you wish to debate here. Your ignorance is confusing.

 

[calamity]

Oh...

An ambiguous number, which means the 20% is scientifically meaningless. It will change with the given baseline.

You really should comprehend basic science if you wish to debate here. Your ignorance is confusing.

It's far from "ambiguous." But, your irony is amusing.

 

[Lord of Planar]

It's far from "ambiguous." But, your irony is amusing.

Absolute numbers out things into true perspective. Relative number, not so much.

You must have failed your science classes.

 

[calamity]

Absolute numbers out things into true perspective. Relative number, not so much.

You must have failed your science classes.

Um, global increases in average temperature are "absolute numbers," by definition.

MathSteps: Grade 7: Absolute Value: What Is It?

 

[Threegoofs]

Um, global increases in average temperature are "absolute numbers," by definition.

MathSteps: Grade 7: Absolute Value: What Is It?

Details, details.

[emoji849]

 

[Lord of Planar]

Maybe you guys can move past the 7th grade?

 

[Sunsettommy]

Um, global increases in average temperature are "absolute numbers," by definition.

MathSteps: Grade 7: Absolute Value: What Is It?

Anomaly are NOT absolute Values, your link makes that clear.....

The NOAA doesn't agree with you

Realclimate doesn't agree with you either

You should stop making a fool of yourself here.

 

[Threegoofs]

Anomaly are NOT absolute Values, your link makes that clear.....

The NOAA doesn't agree with you

Realclimate doesn't agree with you either

You should stop making a fool of yourself here.

They are absolute values comparing relative differences.

You guys really don’t understand the absolute basics of science at all, do you?

 

[Lord of Planar]

Anomaly are NOT absolute Values, your link makes that clear.....

The NOAA doesn't agree with you

Realclimate doesn't agree with you either

You should stop making a fool of yourself here.

It's a daily thing for him, and he's too ignorant to see it.

 

[Lord of Planar]

They are absolute values comparing relative differences.

You guys really don’t understand the absolute basics of science at all, do you?

So they are relative values... Not absolute!

 

[Threegoofs]

So they are relative values... Not absolute!

No, they are absolute.

When something is one degree over a baseline, that is an absolute value.

I cant believe I even have to explain this.

 

[lemmiwinx]

Solar activity has been at minimum for almost a year now. Expect climate scientists to recommend switching back to coal fired electric plants to save the earth from freezing. No offense Greta.

 

[Lord of Planar]

No, they are absolute.

When something is one degree over a baseline, that is an absolute value.

I cant believe I even have to explain this.

In science, absolute readings (data) are from zero.

Relative readings (data) are from a given baseline.

Differential (delta) readings (data) are between two other numbers.

If you fail to comprehend this, I give up. I can't keep up with your ignorance.

 

[Sunsettommy]

They are absolute values comparing relative differences.

You guys really don’t understand the absolute basics of science at all, do you?

You are hilarious, even Realclimate science understand it, unlike you....

Most of the images showing the transient changes in global mean temperatures (GMT) over the 20th Century and projections out to the 21st C, show temperature anomalies. An anomaly is the change in temperature relative to a baseline which usually the pre-industrial period, or a more recent climatology (1951-1980, or 1980-1999 etc.). With very few exceptions the changes are almost never shown in terms of absolute temperatures. So why is that?

bolding mine

:lol:

Want to continue to make a fool of yourself?

 

[Lord of Planar]

You are hilarious, even Realclimate science understand it, unlike you....



bolding mine

:lol:

Want to continue to make a fool of yourself?

He does so every day. Why should he change?