- Joined
- Apr 28, 2011
- Messages
- 36,321
- Reaction score
- 41,281
- Location
- With Yo Mama
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Once again, when government bean counters make the spending decisions, and profit is not a motive, there will be much less in every category. That should not be hard to work out. For instance, the UK has the lowest number of MRI units,, CT and PET Scanners per million people. At the same time, the USA leads the world in availability of those machines.
I really don't want to get deep into the woods on this today. It's a fine day. I'm watching Liverpool vs. Arsenal on the telly, eating cantalope some suffering campesino probably smuggled over the border. I'm time selfish this morning.
As you are no doubt aware MRIs, CT and PET scans are diagnostic technologies. While they are important, to my knowledge they are not palliative or curative such as something like proton beam radiation.
Diagnostics are part of the medical process but in and off themselves they don't cure illness or disease.
Comparing doctors, specialists, diagnostics and curative care between two countries is a shotgun approach and not where you want to be going with this.
I don't know and I doubt that you know the correlation of the availability and use of diagnostic technology and the successful outcomes of curative medicine. It's out there but I'm not going to look for it today. You can, I encourage you to. Please report and document your findings back to us.
I dare say logic encourages us to suspect that available, accessible and affordable technology coupled with well educated, available and affordable medical professionals be the preferred approach for everyone. To increase the opportunities for optimum outcomes increase positive personal social choices, diet and exercise and extensive and well funded and well conducted research. Add to all of that available and affordable pharmaceuticals. Factor all that in and we might seriously compare outcomes.