Prosecute DJT for what?Whaaaaat?!! Is this true that a governor can fire any DA prosecutor in the same state? If true, then what's Giuliani's angle with his statement? Is this a vote getter in a blue state? Has DJT pissed The Rudy off so bad that Giuliani seeks revenge on DA Bragg for putting the kabosh on NYSD v DJT? Is the entire article a spoof? WTF gives????????????????
"You're telling me -- I want to make sure we're clear -- Andrew Giuliani as governor of New York, the first action he will take will be to dismiss -- and they have the power to dismiss the DA?" Bannon asked.
"And the mayor!" Giuliani confirmed. "I could have at any time been dismissed by the governor of New York."
"In the case of Bragg, he gets dismissed for not following his oath of office," he continued. "He doesn't have a right to set up whole categories of crime that he's not going to prosecute. He has the right to not prosecute a particular case for some reason. But he doesn't have a right to say, 'Oh, I'm not going to prosecute anybody who does a hold-up but doesn't shoot anybody.'"
DA Briggs was elected, just Rudy being Rudy...Whaaaaat?!! Is this true that a governor can fire any DA prosecutor in the same state? If true, then what's Giuliani's angle with his statement? Is this a vote getter in a blue state? Has DJT pissed The Rudy off so bad that Giuliani seeks revenge on DA Bragg for putting the kabosh on NYSD v DJT? Is the entire article a spoof? WTF gives????????????????
"You're telling me -- I want to make sure we're clear -- Andrew Giuliani as governor of New York, the first action he will take will be to dismiss -- and they have the power to dismiss the DA?" Bannon asked.
"And the mayor!" Giuliani confirmed. "I could have at any time been dismissed by the governor of New York."
"In the case of Bragg, he gets dismissed for not following his oath of office," he continued. "He doesn't have a right to set up whole categories of crime that he's not going to prosecute. He has the right to not prosecute a particular case for some reason. But he doesn't have a right to say, 'Oh, I'm not going to prosecute anybody who does a hold-up but doesn't shoot anybody.'"
Tax fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud, insurance fraud. Are you seeing a pattern?Prosecute DJT for what?
Prosecute DJT for what?
Is this the same freak son of Rudy's who boasted about looking at his infant daughter's genitals recently?
Why yes, yes it is.
https://www.businessinsider.com/and...rage-disturbing-comments-baby-daughter-2022-3
And don't forget; He got 2 scoops of ice cream.Tax fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud, insurance fraud. Are you seeing a pattern?
You're gonna need a source for that nugget. He's been doing the same thing for years.And don't forget; He got 2 scoops of ice cream.
The pattern is that Trump Hating Democrat Operatives are constantly screeching a lot of noise.
He has been out of office for over a year, he has no power or any real backup. Yet the SDNY is running away from this. They are doing that because they know that it has always been BS and under close scrutiny it will backfire on them.
I cant wait until after the next midterm election when Democrats are swiped from power in the Senate & Congress and we can have real investigations concerning 2020 vote fraud and corrupt federal law enforcement officials role in creating Jan 6.They were Jan 6-related charges.
No, proving a negative is impossible and requesting it shows just how over your head you are.You're gonna need a source for that nugget. He's been doing the same thing for years.
How is asking you to prove the SDNY running away from the prosecution is proving a negative...unless you just made it up.No, proving a negative is impossible and requesting it shows just how over your head you are.
You are the one who has the burden of proof, to show that Trump as been charged with anything or that any of these hyperbolic allegations have done anything but fall apart.
How is asking you to prove the SDNY running away from the prosecution is proving a negative...unless you just made it up.
I cant wait until after the next midterm election when Democrats are swiped from power in the Senate & Congress and we can have real investigations concerning 2020 vote fraud and corrupt federal law enforcement officials role in creating Jan 6.
2 Prosecutors Leading N.Y. Trump Inquiry Resign, Clouding Case’s Future (Published 2022)
The resignations came after the Manhattan district attorney, Alvin Bragg, was said to have expressed doubts about the case.www.nytimes.com
Prosecutors on the case are all resigning, the head prosecutor is expressing doubts. nuff said
Oh wtf, I didn't want to read that
Oh yes..... the we are going to get Trump mentality. We have heard this same crap for years now. It's just delusional dreaming.Tax fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud, insurance fraud. Are you seeing a pattern?
Show the indictmentsThe prosecutors are resigning because they strongly disagree with the DA deciding not to pursue charges. They believe there's plenty of evidence proving The Donald's involvement and are resigning in protest.
You dont even understand what this is about.
You've heard of aShow the indictments
Except there were two Grand Jurys empaneled long before Bragg took office, what happened to those?You've heard of ac*ckindictment blocker, right? Meet Alvin Bragg.
One of two top prosecutors who resigned over the Manhattan district attorney’s alleged decision to stop heading toward indicting former President Donald Trump for crimes said in a bombshell resignation letter that Trump was “guilty of numerous felony violations.”
In that letter, Pomerantz said those felonies related to the “preparation and use of his annual Statements of Financial Condition,” which “were false,” according to a copy of the letter obtained by The New York Times, which first reported its details.Trump 'guilty of numerous' felonies, prosecutor told Manhattan district attorney as he resigned from probe
The Manhattan District Attorney's Office has investigated former President Donald Trump for several years, but so far has not charged him.www.cnbc.com
Pomerantz also told Bragg that the DA’s decision not to seek charges against Trump, and to “indefinitely” suspend the 3-year-old probe was “contrary to the public interest.”
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?