If SC lets them change birthright citizenship by EO, then the SC will be wrong.
yeaYou mean the same voter fraud claims no one's substantiated?
What?
No.
Because when you show up to fraudulently use my name and registration to vote, you'll be arrested. You are familiar with voter rolls, yes?
MAGA thinks people want to risk prison by standing in five different lines to fraudelently vote. For five votes. Five years per vote.
Most everyone has ID. So what?
Nobody I know is opposed to voter ID. What concerns people is that voters will be denied their rights.
Not allowing someone to vote because he lost his voter ID on the way to the poll is a voting rights violation.
Democrats have been champions of voting rights. MAGA are against democracy.
when someone votes twice, they deny other people their right to vote
Well, there is the count of registered voters against the actual number of votes as the most basic way. Remind me again when in US history there was a massive discrepancy between the two?
They are not. What they are not in favor of is potentially disenfranchising those who may not have state issued IDs and creating what amounts to a poll tax since there is no free IDs. This is all being done based on the claims some have made about there being widespread voter fraud, which they have not been able to substantiate through their own investigations or in a court of law.
2020
When someone attempts to use another's name and registration, they will be arrested. I already said this. If someone steals and mails someone else's ballot, they will be arrested. If someone mails a ballot from a deceased spouse, they will be arrested.
They get caught.
That's pretty much what I said. Those that don't are concerned about voters being denied their rights. Imagine showing up at the polling place having lost your voter ID. Your rights would be violated if an alternate ID wasn't accepted, and if alternate ID is acceptable, then voter ID is redundant and unnecessary.
Those that vote twice are arrested.
What discrepancy existed in 2020?
As much as I'd get a good chuckle out of you potentially responding with links to 2000 Mules and other examples that don't cut it. I am curious as to when you think the Trump administration proved their case in court.
I'm fine with that, as long as it's free and convenient to obtain it.
well, here is the problemAs much as I'd get a good chuckle out of you potentially responding with links to 2000 Mules and other examples that don't cut it. I am curious as to when you think the Trump administration proved their case in court.
Each state has its own certification process. The process can be found in state law. A call to your county election officials could likely answer the question directly.
Of course we can. We've been certifying mail ballots since the Civil War.
Tinfoil.
Baloney. Pure baloney.
Thanks for admitting fewer people would vote as a result of strengthening voter integrity. Those “fewer” voters shouldn’t be voting in the first place.
Most people who commit crimes with firearms don’t purchase the from a store. They are typically stollen weapons.
Voter ID requirement is acceptable to me if, and only if, the required ID is easily available, accessible, and entirely free of any costs to the potential voter.