- Joined
- Jun 19, 2013
- Messages
- 10,699
- Reaction score
- 11,534
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
So the ONLY Way to confirm who is telling the Truth and who is lying would be to re count the ballots and verify the signatures (which
went from 20 points of Verification down to 0 points).
You got me to think back to when Nixon eventually resigned from office to avoid being impeached. However, I don't believe that there was any talk, back then, to charge him with a crime, in which even as young that I was and not really into politics, I still thought that he should have been sent to jail for Watergate. I felt like Nixon escaped 'justice served' and for me, that was the first example that a president is above the law.Well, unfortunately, Mueller's decision was a precedent. That the DOJ opinion of not indicting a sitting President was an untested legal theory. Then it became tested, and it passed into the halls of precedent. And a precedent of a head of state being above the law is far more dangerous than any alternative scenario they may have been afraid of.
It passed into precedent in the time of an obviously corrupt AG. Let's remember the Roe v Wade precedent may be overturned.Well, unfortunately, Mueller's decision was a precedent. That the DOJ opinion of not indicting a sitting President was an untested legal theory. Then it became tested, and it passed into the halls of precedent. And a precedent of a head of state being above the law is far more dangerous than any alternative scenario they may have been afraid of.
Sorry I thought it was obvious that "Signature Verification" implied Mail in Ballots. But I guess not everyone can follow the obvious.I know this is obvious to most people, but it appears not all know this...
In the United States ballots don't have signatures.
/Public Service Announcement.
WW
Sorry I thought it was obvious that "Signature Verification" implied Mail in Ballots. But I guess not everyone can follow the obvious.
Absentee/mail-in voting signature and witness requirements, 2020
Ballotpedia: The Encyclopedia of American Politicsballotpedia.org
You didn't hear how many Mail in Ballots were sent out ? Multiple ones to the same person ?.... Missed that too? Then I assume you
also missed how AFTER the Election many States were FORCED to clean up the Voter Roll!....
Judicial Watch Study: 1.8 Million Extra Registered Voters - Judicial Watch
Judicial Watch Asks for Full Court Review on Clinton Testimony Voter Registration in 353 Counties in 29 States Exceeds 100% Judicial Watch is Joining The ObamaGate Movie as Executive Producers Ballot Update: We Clean Up Dirty Voter Rolls Federal Agency Under Fire for Promoting ‘White Lives...www.judicialwatch.org
/Public Service Announcement.
These Liberal biased sites don't mean $h!+ . Judicial Watch goes to court get the information and resolves these matters LEGALLY !Judicial Watch
Last updated on April 5th, 2021 at 02:58 pm
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section of that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate Judicial Watch Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories, and an abysmal fact check record.
Somehow, it seems that you always pick the far right nutcase sources for your response, all of them that are far right with lots of failed fact checks.These Liberal biased sites don't mean $h!+ . Judicial Watch goes to court get the information and resolves these matters LEGALLY !
Not with some BS Web page that shows the Brain dead Sheep Good -> Bad Graphs!
Judicial Watch might focus more on the DEMs/Left but that does not mean the FACTS they uncover and EXPOSE to us are invalid!
Maybe unliked by the Left but not invalid or wrong !
For Example:
This is no extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories, and an abysmal fact check record.Los Angeles County agrees to purge voter rolls in Judicial Watch settlement
Los Angeles County has agreed to conduct a purge of its voting rolls, in a move that could strip perhaps 1.5 million inactive voters from the lists of those eligible to cast ballots.www.washingtontimes.com
It is JW Helping American have Honest Elections ! But your FactChecker did not put that in there Propaganda did they?
I guess they know the Suckers they are manipulating....
WOW, You still don't understand! Do you?....Somehow, it seems that you always pick the far right nutcase sources for your response, all of them that are far right with lots of failed fact checks.
And?WOW, You still don't understand! Do you?....
I just pointed out that JW got the information legally and legally got the Government body to follow the law !!!
No Left Right Pissing contest here !!! Just right vs wrong !!!!...
Do you understand now ?.....
P.S. Just because they "TELL YOU" something is a "far right nutcase sources" , does not make it True!!!!...
They are calling people who FOLLOW THE LAWS "Far Right" !!!.....
Do you see how that's insane ?.....
Show me where JW got sued for >$200,000,000 for lying!
Alan Dershowitz scores legal victory: $300M defamation suit against CNN can proceed
Alan Dershowitz will be allowed to continue with his $300 million lawsuit against CNN after U.S. District Court agreed with defamation claimwww.bizpacreview.com CNN settles lawsuit with Nick Sandmann stemming from viral video controversy | CNN Business
CNN has settled a lawsuit with a Kentucky high school student who was at the center of a viral video controversy, a spokesperson for the news network confirmed Tuesday.www.cnn.com Nicholas Sandmann reaches settlement with NBC in Covington Catholic High School controversy
Former Covington Catholic High School student Nicholas Sandmann tweeted an update about his lawsuit against NBCUniversal.www.bizpacreview.com Nicholas Sandmann Announces MASSIVE SETTLEMENT in his Lawsuit Against NBC
On Friday, Covington Catholic High School student Nicholas Sandmann took to social media to announce that he settled a defamation lawsuit against NBC. The lawsuit was originally for $275 million. Sandmann said in his tweet thatlibertyonenews.com
Now run to your liberal media rating page and see where they put CNN & NBC !
You triggered him.And?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?