Oftencold
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2008
- Messages
- 5,044
- Reaction score
- 2,202
- Location
- A small village in Alaska
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
They both are an issue.
Regardless if you think it is just a slogan.
It is a Public record.
So there is no expectation of privacy at all.
This was not something that was not going to be reported.
Yet they blocked out the plate number.
So you really have nothing to complain about other that your dislike of how public information was disseminated.
Yeah it does. The number of death threats against him and his family is massive. That officer or someone in his department issued a press/media statement to announce "That guy so many people want to kill? Here's the vehicle he is driving and where he was last seen. This should help those who want to kill him to find him."
You obviously cared enough to respond.
Others may care because it shows he is still armed.
What does it matter to you whether another person cares or not?
I think I'd be minding the posted speed limits if I was trying to keep my whereabouts a secret.
So George might be hanging around my town. Or, the Texas State Troopers could have convinced him to keep traveling. He should go to Arizona. No chance getting pulled over there.
Was there a sidewalk in the area?
he prolly wont have to shoot anyone then.
One more time, he was not proven innocent.
Yes he was, why do you think they had the whole court battle? The prosecution had no evidence to convict him. It was legal self defense.
The word games are good, but a person in the US is innocent until proven guilty.This is much more than semantics. Z was not convicted because there was not enough evidence to convict him. In absolutely no way did the court even attempt to prove him innocient, all any court attempts to do is prove someone guilty. Zimmerman was "found" not guilty. By no means was he proven innocent.
The word games are good, but a person in the US is innocent until proven guilty.
Since the State was unable to prove guilt, the innocents remains intact.
In a criminal court, the State tries to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.It is a difficult concept to grasp, but he was not proven innocent, he was found not guilty due to lack of evidence. There has already been a thred about finding the Z man super innocent or something.
You sure like beating on someone who was proven innocent by a court and protected himself. . .
In a criminal court, the State tries to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
The Defendant is innocent until the State gets a guilty verdict.
If the State fails to get a guilty verdict, the defendant is, as they were before, innocent.
The Court does not prove someone innocent, that is assumed.
The Criminal court tries to prove them not innocent or guilty.
And Twitter erupted with a bunch of young idiots saying "ZOMG! He has a GUN??? Why is he allowed to have a GUN?????"
Just in case he gets jumped by a homophobic black guy?
Homophobic? Is Zimmerman gay now?
Jeantel explained to Pierce Morgan that when she was talking to Martin after Zimmerman had contacted him (and they went their separate ways) that she told him the reason Zimmerman might be following him was because he was a rapist, and that Martin should be careful not to lead him back to his home because his little brother was there. The physical altercation happened after that when Martin turned and followed Zimmerman. So according to the prosecution's star witness, Martin attacked Zimmerman because he thought he was gay. It doesn't matter if Zimmerman was gay or not, evidently Martin THOUGHT he might be and that was why he attacked him. Last I checked that would be a hate crime.
Why shouldn't he be armed? That is his Constitutional Right.
This is much more than semantics. Z was not convicted because there was not enough evidence to convict him. In absolutely no way did the court even attempt to prove him innocient, all any court attempts to do is prove someone guilty. Zimmerman was "found" not guilty. By no means was he proven innocent.
It is a difficult concept to grasp, but he was not proven innocent, he was found not guilty due to lack of evidence. There has already been a thred about finding the Z man super innocent or something.
It's not that the state didn't have enough evidence, its that the state didn't have any evidence.This is much more than semantics. Z was not convicted because there was not enough evidence to convict him. In absolutely no way did the court even attempt to prove him innocient, all any court attempts to do is prove someone guilty. Zimmerman was "found" not guilty. By no means was he proven innocent.
You obviously cared enough to respond.
Others may care because it shows he is still armed.
What does it matter to you whether another person cares or not?
I cared enough because I respect a man who was proven to be innocent's privacy. He was acquitted. People should really get over it.
He was pulled over! Who hasn't been pulled over at least once? Why is it noteworthy? Because he has a gun? Isn't that legal in the United States?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?