I'm betting that just about everybody on this board .. which I'm new to .. who supports George Zimmerman and stand your ground laws, are republican/teabagger/conservative/right winger/just hates black people
Wrong.Lets see, what they have in common...um, Zimmerman.
He killed a kid. At some point that day he could have done something different to aviod that. There was not enough evidence to convict him...great. Those are the facts. Nuthin dishonest about that.
I'm betting that just about everybody on this board .. which I'm new to .. who supports George Zimmerman and stand your ground laws, are republican/teabagger/conservative/right winger/just hates black people. Most all fall somewhere in that mix.
I have no illusion that I possess the power to change anyone's mind about anything .. thus, how you interpret stand your ground is purely up to you .. interpret them anyway you choose. But for me, they represent an evil reminiscent of America's ****-stained racist past. I equate the murder of Trayvon Martin to that of Emmitt Till .. reinforced the further murder of an innocent woman stranded by car problems.
As with most laws, it's less about the law itself, than it is about the application of the law.
Nail in coffin forever.
Not sure if this was posted yet....
911 calls released following Zimmerman domestic disturbance arrest - U.S. News
That's the 911 call made by the girlfriend and his following call. Notice his relative calm... interesting.
You obvious have no idea what you are talking about.Ahhhh the right. No matter how blatantly obvious it is you were wrong, you will stick to your guns (no pun intended) to the bitter end. This is why you guys are intellectually inferior. Despite new evidence you cling to your old beliefs blindly. This is why you're always "losing" your country, because your mind is stuck in the past.
What is dishonest is leaving out that he did so in self defense against an attacker.
Hmmmm....lets see. Killing an unarmed teenager....pulling guns on two different girlfriends.....yeah....I think in most people's books...that would be considered being a menace to society. You think differently?That hasn't been shown to be true in any sense of the word.
Interesting. So your argument is basically: "I have no actual evidence for what I am saying, but I'm not going to let that stop me from smearing large groups of people if it allows me to adopt a morally offended tone."
Well, I don't know you. But considering that you probably eat children, I discount your right to condemn others.
It is what the evidence supports.There's no evidence that he was attacked.
:doh His account is supported by the evidence.Unless you want to take the claims Zimmerman made as Bible truth.
Don't care what you believe. The jury found his actions justified.Of course, you do believe his claims.
I never did.
Nothing but exaggerated bs!He's a danger to anyone who happens to be in the same zip code.
I have a feeling most radical left-wingers don't know there ass from hole in the ground.......yup that would be my guess.
Killed in self defense against an attacker.Hmmmm....lets see. Killing an unarmed teenager..
Wrong and not proven...pulling guns on two different girlfriends...
As the first is irrelevant and the with the second being combined known lies, leaves just an unproven accusation..that would be considered being a menace to society. You think differently?
Don't care what you believe.
No, my argument is that you can believe whatever you want to believe. Why would I care?
I'm posting my perspective of Zimmerman and the consequences .. not at all concerned about what you believe.
The only question then is, who the **** cares? :0)
Evidently you do, because you felt the need to describe it (without knowing it) in such glowing terms in order to position yourself in juxtaposition to it. If you didn't care, there would have been no first paragraph to your post .
Killed in self defense against an attacker.
Not relevant to your claim.
Wrong and not proven.
As the first is irrelevant and the with the second being combined known lies, leaves just an unproven accusation.
So yeah. Stating he is, is an exaggeration and ridiculous at this point.
And there you have it.The the two of us are on the same page.
So it's your claim that the woman are not be honest? Only Zimmerman is being honest in both circumstances?
You obvious have no idea what you are talking about.
Nor is one case related to the other.
iLOL :dohLoL, oh of course not, nope. This pattern of violent incidents are all just one offs, lmao. It might be time for you to come out from under the blanket.
At least my opinion in the first is based on the evidence, while yours is not.
Yours is based on gullibly believing the testimony of a man who is very quickly building up an extensive rap sheet of demonstrated violence against women and children and complete disregard for the law.
Wrong.Yours is based on gullibly believing the testimony of a man who is very quickly building up an extensive rap sheet of demonstrated violence against women and children and complete disregard for the law.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?