disneydude
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2006
- Messages
- 25,528
- Reaction score
- 8,470
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Until more is known, hard to decide if they just have it out for him or if Z is just a moron.
Moron. thank goodness he does not have anger control issues, someone could get killed...:roll:
No, just because 2 different women have accused him of abuse and he just happened to shoot and kill a 17 year old kid he was stalking, he is just a good, honest freedom loving american!
Evidently he already knocked up this new girlfriend...
oh, mak, if you could only come to terms with him not being the evil white demon you were originally lead to believe ...
While this woman's allegations have yet to be proven true, it does bring to mind the fact Zimmerman keeps getting caught in these "gun-pulling" fiascos. If proven true, this is becoming a pattern of real concern that would need to be looked into.
You are kidding right? He killed a kid and now is starting on women. Is he white?
You are kidding right? He killed a kid and now is starting on women. Is he white?
Yes, he killed a kid in self-defense (according to him) and was found NOT-GUILTY. You sound as bad as abortionists do when they say abortion is murder when in fact it isn't. You don't agree with the verdict, we get it.
:0) George Zimmerman is the final nail in the coffin where any hope of republicans getting any share of the African-American vote is buried.
Good luck with that in national elections.
While this woman's allegations have yet to be proven true, it does bring to mind the fact Zimmerman keeps getting caught in these "gun-pulling" fiascos. If proven true, this is becoming a pattern of real concern that would need to be looked into.
Wait, I said killed, there was not enough evidence to find him guilty of murder. What are you talking about abortion for?
he's talking about you selectively leaving out the aspect of self-defense
What bothers me is the willingness of people to find him guilty in the TM case based on completely unrelated incidents. People need to realize your innocence and guilt isn't defined by character or popularity
The kid was unarmed. I dont beleive it but there was not enough evidnece to convict him. Fine. Now he pulled a gun on a woman. Oh my, I must have been wrong about him. hehe.
Yes, you could be wrong about him in the TM case. One case doesn't equate automatically with the other. Someone could have rightfully defended themselves and then commited a murder at another time.
The kid was unarmed.
I dont beleive it but there was not enough evidnece to convict him.
Now he pulled a gun on a woman.
Oh my, I must have been wrong about him. hehe.
Can't they just stay away from each other?
But i thought he was a decent, loving guy - protecting the world and all that.
This is true, but if I was gonna bet on it...
Again, I'm not going to say there isn't a "possible" pattern here, but I don't look at a case (that someone was found not-guilty on) and then apply guilt to something not yet proven.
I think the best bet is to wait and see how this turns out. If found guilty though, I think Zimmerman needs help.
True, but add that into the incident with his ex-wife and now his girlfriend (if proven true) and you see a pattern of problems dealing with weapons. That doesn't mean he is some devil guilty of murder, but it does seem to indicate (at face value) an issue with him and firearms.
If I were on the jury I would agree, but this is an internet discussion forum, the evidence level is a bit differnet.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?