General Conspricay Question - WHY[W:23]

[Fledermaus]

WHY did the Evil Powers That Be:

1. Kill Kennedy in broad daylight, in a public place, with numerous witnesses that could have/would have seen/heard something amiss?

2. Kill Kennedy in with shots fired from different directions? Something even a rookie coroner would discover.

3. Provide a script to the BBC about the collapse of WTC7?

4. Utilize "explosives" in WTC7 that waited 8 hours before going off? Why not have it collapse in the debris and fire that consumed so many other buildings in the complex? Why allow EVERYONE to depart WTC7?

5. Use a "cruise missile" at the Pentagon? They had a perfectly good airliner bearing down on the target. Why risk witnesses noticing a "cruise missile"?

6. Prepare an open field in Pennsylvania with "stage props"? Why not simply crash the airliner there?

7. Utilize "hush-a-boom" explosives (do not produce the levels of blast/sound a real explosive makes) yet use just enough "explosives" that people heard them?

8. Utilize "thermite" to silently bring down the buildings yet use just enough "explosives" that people heard them?

9. Use so much "thermite" that "rivers" of "molten steel" flowed in the debris months later?

10. Use "mini-nukes" which would have been noticed by EVERYONE present? And I mean everyone. Save for those already dead.

 

[Marvin]

From a speech that I heard some years ago ( I don't remember who was giving said speech ... )
however a bit from that speech was the statement that two Presidents were shot in the head in public places
and if you examine what these two presidents had in common, you will get at least a bit closer to knowing who the killer was.

Andrew Jackson ( opposed the central bank ) attempted assassination
Abraham Lincoln ( opposed the central bank ) assassinated
William McKinley ( promoted Gold Standard currency ) assassinated
JFK ( opposed the central bank ) assassinated

anybody see a pattern here?

 

[Fledermaus]

From a speech that I heard some years ago ( I don't remember who was giving said speech ... )
however a bit from that speech was the statement that two Presidents were shot in the head in public places
and if you examine what these two presidents had in common, you will get at least a bit closer to knowing who the killer was.

Andrew Jackson ( opposed the central bank ) attempted assassination
Abraham Lincoln ( opposed the central bank ) assassinated
William McKinley ( promoted Gold Standard currency ) assassinated
JFK ( opposed the central bank ) assassinated

anybody see a pattern here?

I washed my car, it rained. More than once.

 

[WCH]

From a speech that I heard some years ago ( I don't remember who was giving said speech ... )
however a bit from that speech was the statement that two Presidents were shot in the head in public places
and if you examine what these two presidents had in common, you will get at least a bit closer to knowing who the killer was.

Andrew Jackson ( opposed the central bank ) attempted assassination
Abraham Lincoln ( opposed the central bank ) assassinated
William McKinley ( promoted Gold Standard currency ) assassinated
JFK ( opposed the central bank ) assassinated

anybody see a pattern here?

I agree but, was Reagan's just a nut job?

 

[Mark F]

WHY did the Evil Powers That Be:

1. Kill Kennedy in broad daylight, in a public place, with numerous witnesses that could have/would have seen/heard something amiss?

2. Kill Kennedy in with shots fired from different directions? Something even a rookie coroner would discover.

3. Provide a script to the BBC about the collapse of WTC7?

4. Utilize "explosives" in WTC7 that waited 8 hours before going off? Why not have it collapse in the debris and fire that consumed so many other buildings in the complex? Why allow EVERYONE to depart WTC7?

5. Use a "cruise missile" at the Pentagon? They had a perfectly good airliner bearing down on the target. Why risk witnesses noticing a "cruise missile"?

6. Prepare an open field in Pennsylvania with "stage props"? Why not simply crash the airliner there?

7. Utilize "hush-a-boom" explosives (do not produce the levels of blast/sound a real explosive makes) yet use just enough "explosives" that people heard them?

8. Utilize "thermite" to silently bring down the buildings yet use just enough "explosives" that people heard them?

9. Use so much "thermite" that "rivers" of "molten steel" flowed in the debris months later?

10. Use "mini-nukes" which would have been noticed by EVERYONE present? And I mean everyone. Save for those already dead.

That is at least 9 too many questions.

 

[ozeco41]

From a speech that I heard some years ago ( I don't remember who was giving said speech ... )
however a bit from that speech was the statement that two Presidents were shot in the head in public places
and if you examine what these two presidents had in common, you will get at least a bit closer to knowing who the killer was.

Andrew Jackson ( opposed the central bank ) attempted assassination
Abraham Lincoln ( opposed the central bank ) assassinated
William McKinley ( promoted Gold Standard currency ) assassinated
JFK ( opposed the central bank ) assassinated

anybody see a pattern here?

Yes. There are more CT's who play the "coincidences" cards than there are active 9/11 truthers.

I washed my car, it rained. More than once.

That works even better here "down under".

I on two occasions washed my car and we had floods in the whole northern section of the state.

The difference - car washing >>> rains for you and car washing >>> floods here is probably due to us being on the bottom of the world and the proven fact that water runs downhill.

And that lot is at least as logical as many of the truther claims we see.

AND (so far) I have not repeated my "Santa's Custard Did It" explanation for the CD of WTC.

 

[Marvin]

I agree but, was Reagan's just a nut job?

If Reagan was eliminated, then George H.W. Bush would have become President.
( sooner than if he did the election fiasco ..... )

 

[Fledermaus]

If Reagan was eliminated, then George H.W. Bush would have become President.
( sooner than if he did the election fiasco ..... )

What "election fiasco" are you taking about???????????????

 

[Marvin]

What "election fiasco" are you taking about???????????????

that is George H.W. Bush running for office & getting elected
but the whole scene is a fiasco, the votes are "counted" away from public inspection
and we get a "choice" between the ridiculous donkey and equally ridiculous elephant.
its a FARCE!

 

[Fledermaus]

that is George H.W. Bush running for office & getting elected
but the whole scene is a fiasco, the votes are "counted" away from public inspection
and we get a "choice" between the ridiculous donkey and equally ridiculous elephant.
its a FARCE!

WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?

He was Vice President. And was elected over Dukakis by a comfortable margin.

 

[Marvin]

WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?

He was Vice President. And was elected over Dukakis by a comfortable margin.

Are you so trusting that you simply accept whatever the mainstream media promotes?

 

[ozeco41]

That is at least 9 too many questions.

And the first response did not answer any of them - it brought up another one:
11) Why do a lot of CT's build their case on identified coincidences?

Now if anyone wants a SERIOUS[SUP]*[/SUP] answer try this:
"It is often because truthers do not or cannot think" Specifically their "thinking process" is divergent when decision making and explaining require convergent thinking. Reasoning given in numerous previous posts.



*Google says:
adjective: serious

1. demanding or characterized by careful consideration or application.
2. acting or speaking sincerely and in earnest, rather than in a joking or half-hearted manner.

 

[Fledermaus]

Are you so trusting that you simply accept whatever the mainstream media promotes?

Paranoia strikes deep
Into your life it will creep
It starts when you're always afraid
Step out of line, the men come and take you away

 

[ozeco41]

I agree but, was Reagan's just a nut job?

If Reagan was eliminated, then George H.W. Bush would have become President.
( sooner than if he did the election fiasco ..... )

We must admire Marvin's skill at derailing by leading down rabbit burrows.

He already has moved four orders of distancing the discussion from the OP and we are only at post 14.

chase the bunny rabbit anyone?

 

[Fledermaus]

And the first response did not answer any of them - it brought up another one:
11) Why do a lot of CT's build their case on identified coincidences?

Now if anyone wants a SERIOUS[SUP]*[/SUP] answer try this:
"It is often because truthers do not or cannot think" Specifically their "thinking process" is divergent when decision making and explaining require convergent thinking. Reasoning given in numerous previous posts.



*Google says:
adjective: serious

1. demanding or characterized by careful consideration or application.
2. acting or speaking sincerely and in earnest, rather than in a joking or half-hearted manner.

 

[Fledermaus]

We must admire Marvin's skill at derailing by leading down rabbit burrows.

He already has moved four orders of distancing the discussion from the OP and we are only at post 14.

chase the bunny rabbit anyone?

Indeed... It is fun to see how the tortured mind works.

I wonder if he tapes over the camera on his laptop lid so the NSA doesn't find him....

 

[ozeco41]

Indeed... It is fun to see how the tortured mind works.

I wonder if he tapes over the camera on his laptop lid so the NSA doesn't find him....

You will never make a CT.

The tape would be transparent to NSA technology.

You have to think like a CT. (And don't comment on the oxymoron)

 

[Fledermaus]

You will never make a CT.

The tape would be transparent to NSA technology.

AHA... I have Super Hi Impermiability Tape


(Gotta milk that one dry)

 

[ozeco41]

AHA... I have Super Hi Impermiability Tape


(Gotta milk that one dry)

Are you aware of my career history?

Mostly Water and Sewerage Engineering - and for several years I was boss of all sewerage for Sydney - pop 4.5 millions.

So I'm the resident turdologist - and - if you get me started telling faeces related jokes I cannot easily be deterred. :roll:

 

[Marvin]

Indeed... It is fun to see how the tortured mind works.

I wonder if he tapes over the camera on his laptop lid so the NSA doesn't find him....

Who ever said anything about my computer having a camera built in?
not all machines have those built-in web-cam thingies.

or maybe I'm so technically hip to have installed a physical switch so as to be able to shut-off
that feature. and if you really want to speculate, I sit here naked in full view of the web-cam
and if big brother wants to snoop, so be it!

 

[Mark F]

We must admire Marvin's skill at derailing by leading down rabbit burrows.

He already has moved four orders of distancing the discussion from the OP and we are only at post 14.

chase the bunny rabbit anyone?

Ummm, taste's like Chicken.

 

[ozeco41]

Ummm, taste's like Chicken.

Way back in the early days of the fast food revolution there was in country NSW (My state) a prosecution of KFR.

Around that same time I can recall the first place selling these flat circles of pastry with chunks of meat and other toppings. General reaction was "It will never sell".

Benefit of the "41" bit - I've lived through many waves of change.

 

[Helix]

Moderator's Warning:

Baiting, trolling, and personal attacks will stop now, or thread bans will follow.

 

[Linc]

Since Reagan did not die, the 20-year conspiracy ended that had begun in 1840 .

If Reagan was eliminated, then George H.W. Bush would have become President.
( sooner than if he did the election fiasco ..... )

 

[Marvin]

Since Reagan did not die, the 20-year conspiracy ended that had begun in 1840 .

Chemists have Solutions.
Lincoln-Dem.

and Electricians do it without shorts!