• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

GBU-57A/B MOP

Rexedgar

Yo-Semite!
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Apr 6, 2017
Messages
73,857
Reaction score
68,127
Location
RMN
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
How does this bomb work? I understand that it is similar to much smaller armor-piercing rounds; two charges, one to make a hole and another to blow once the armor has been breached. If the target is 200’ deep, how does the first charge make a 200’ hole to deliver the main charge? Does it just blow a 200’ crater? If there were an auger, I could see that.
 

THAT was hard work finding the answers for you. 🤨
 
How does this bomb work? I understand that it is similar to much smaller armor-piercing rounds; two charges, one to make a hole and another to blow once the armor has been breached. If the target is 200’ deep, how does the first charge make a 200’ hole to deliver the main charge? Does it just blow a 200’ crater? If there were an auger, I could see that.
It's pretty advanced.

First it is programmed for a probable depth then it has sensors to detect a cavity.

Once the bomb hits open space it blows.

That is very simplistic but that is essentially how it works.
 
Why not just use a MOAB- especially in an isolated mountainous area with no civilians around, like where these nuclear sites are located? Seems like the perfect location for something like that. Too expensive?
 
Why not just use a MOAB- especially in an isolated mountainous area with no civilians around, like where these nuclear sites are located? Seems like the perfect location for something like that. Too expensive?
Multiple reasons:
1) The GBU-43/B MOAB is an air burst weapon. Targets have to be on the surface.
2) The majority of the nuclear targets are buried, hence you need a penetrator. (See reason 1).
3) The GBU-43/B is dropped from a C-130 cargo aircraft which is hardly a survival platform when penetrating deep into Iranian airspace.

 
Multiple reasons:
1) The GBU-43/B MOAB is an air burst weapon. Targets have to be on the surface.
2) The majority of the nuclear targets are buried, hence you need a penetrator. (See reason 1).
3) The GBU-43/B is dropped from a C-130 cargo aircraft which is hardly a survival platform when penetrating deep into Iranian airspace.

Regarding # 3: I think Iran has pretty much lost control over its airspace right now, so I'm not sure that's a big consideration. But as far as the others: interesting. Thanks for the info.
 
Last edited:
Multiple reasons:
1) The GBU-43/B MOAB is an air burst weapon. Targets have to be on the surface.
2) The majority of the nuclear targets are buried, hence you need a penetrator. (See reason 1).
3) The GBU-43/B is dropped from a C-130 cargo aircraft which is hardly a survival platform when penetrating deep into Iranian airspace.

Trump brags, “we own the air.”

 


This is a little cartoonish. I would think that kinetic energy would only get the bomb so far. The launch altitude is reported to be 20k. According to the clip, the bomb can be adapted to penetrate to 100m.
 


This is a little cartoonish. I would think that kinetic energy would only get the bomb so far. The launch altitude is reported to be 20k. According to the clip, the bomb can be adapted to penetrate to 100m.

God, that awful. The GBU-57 does not have a rocket motor. And 20k sounds very low for a drop altitude.
 
I took high school physics. I’m from Missouri as to kinetic energy carrying this behemoth 200’ through whatever ground it is dropped on.
 
Why not just use a MOAB- especially in an isolated mountainous area with no civilians around, like where these nuclear sites are located? Seems like the perfect location for something like that. Too expensive?
This is a fair question.

I would imagine expense is part of it.
 
I would posit that even if the bomb doesn’t penetrate all the way to the facility there’s the distinct possibility that the huge explosion would create enough cracks in the rock mountain and weaken the ceiling of the intended target enough to cause it to collapse.
 
Back
Top Bottom