WeAreReborn
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2010
- Messages
- 504
- Reaction score
- 93
- Location
- California
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
That passage has to do with a diet high purines, which yes is harmful; as is sodomy. A single clam probably won't harm you, but make it a staple and you're in trouble.
Pairings which are the most likely to fail over time. Examples include the financially volatile, mixed race, mixed religion and 2 men (not 2 women).
The whole "let consenting adults do what they want" mantra ignores whether or not their choice is a smart or wise choice and how their relationship affects everyone else. No one lives in a vacuum.
rof Sentences begin with capitol letters.
Why should you decide what is best for others?Pairings which are the most likely to fail over time. Examples include the financially volatile, mixed race, mixed religion and 2 men (not 2 women).
The whole "let consenting adults do what they want" mantra ignores whether or not their choice is a smart or wise choice and how their relationship affects everyone else. No one lives in a vacuum.
rof Sentences begin with capitol letters.
Capitol is spelled capitalrof :lamo
Did you know that fellatio is sodomy? So you don't let girls give you head?which yes is harmful; as is sodomy.
Pairings which are the most likely to fail over time. Examples include the financially volatile, mixed race, mixed religion and 2 men (not 2 women).
The whole "let consenting adults do what they want" mantra ignores whether or not their choice is a smart or wise choice and how their relationship affects everyone else. No one lives in a vacuum.
Government licenses are hardly private.
Yeah I probably could dig up some info on the drip, urinary tract infections and the ease of contracting an std through the rectum. I KNOW I could provide data on alcohol's harmfulness, but that's legal, so this isn't a case of "it's harmful therefore it should be banned"; which also mean this is not a case of "it's not harmful therefore it should be legal".Can you give a legitimate study on where sodomoy is harmful?
And assuming you are in fact correct, why should you control it and why do you assume homosexuals indulge in frequent amounts of sodomy?
Did you know that fellatio is sodomy? So you don't let girls give you head?
Oral sex is also mildly risky. Of course, breathing is bad for your health, since you take in toxins with every breath. We should ban/regulate breathing!
Really? That might be why I never said anything about private.
So you are a conservative who believes in much more government control over personal decisions?
The state, not me, should control the licenses it issues because the state has a compelling interest in couples raising children.
You sure did, right here:
It's not a personal decision. You are not the only party involved. The state is a signing party in that contract, so shutting out the state is like shutting out your would-be spouse.
It's a public, communal decision. You already have to comply with the community's restrictions on whom you can select to marry. Sex is but one of those restrictions no different than marital status.
Did you know that fellatio is sodomy? So you don't let girls give you head?
So I guess if we stretch the meaning of the word personal to mean something that it doesn't, then you have a point, otherwise you are off in some far out bizarro world that has nothing to do with what I am saying.
By the way, your same argument could be used to further regulate or ban guns.
this is common place for him and this issue, just like his "marriage is for children" debate
Hey, I just mentioned that liquor is harmful right, and yet here I am drinking :2wave:
As I said, this is not a case of "it's harmful so ban it", nor is this a case of "it's harmless so legalize it".
A careful reader would notice that I haven't spoken out against gay marriage on this thread.
So I guess if we stretch the meaning of the word personal to mean something that it doesn't, then you have a point, otherwise you are off in some far out bizarro world that has nothing to do with what I am saying.
By the way, your same argument could be used to further regulate or ban guns.
I see I'm not the only one tipping the bottle tonight. A 'lil Capt'n?
Sipp'n some Crown, myself.
well that explains a lot, I was wondering how one gets so off topic, makes meaningless random points and is so void of logic on a particular subject
I no longer drink actually. That is why my posts are accurate.
And to think, it all started when someone was like "oh yeah, well the bible bans selfish, too". I guess I saw the irrelevant-tangent-train and jumped aboard. What are we supposed to be talking about, anyway? Gay relationships? State doesn't regulate/stop what you do, so who gives a ****. Go have your fun.
I no longer drink actually. That is why my posts are accurate.
either this is a mistype for shellfish or the bible suddenly became some piece of leftist awesome!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?