Apparently you don't base your opinions on reality.Homos are abnormal perverts who are born that way....as are some unfortunates with congenital defects.
There are some that become that way when brainwashed by the perverts that adopt them.
Apparently you don't base your opinions on reality.
I'm not saying discriminate --- I'm saying call it something else other than the word "marriage". Then we're all set. I can't make it any simpler and really can't explain any more than I already have. Either you can read, comprehend and process my view, or you cannot.
1.)Just as policies to promote 'equality' for African-Americans in work, politics, etc., by hiring and/or electing African-Americans because they're African-American is unfair and fails to lead to equality, so are policies unfair and unsuccessful that promote gay marriage.
2.)The policy of this country should be to 'equalize' rights for gays and straights alike.
3.) The fallacy in this country is marriage is that great equalizer, when the great equalizer(s) are: equal ability for both unions to have children, equal ability of both unions to take advantage of tax deductions, and equal ability of both unions to share debts (and fortunes).
What real effect does calling it marriage have on you?
1.) what policies are those?
2.) thats what we are working to
3.) nobody believes that they just want to end discrimination and grant equality, there will still be homophobes just like there are still racists.
What effect do calling a same-sex union have on me? Would be like this simile: calling a Boston Red Sox fan a New York Yankee baseball fan.
1.)And the gov't is determining that certain religion's beliefs are inconsequential.
2.)What real effect does calling a same-sex union a union have on you?
1.)I've tangled with you before. Just look at what used to be California's union legislation before California's same-sex legislation overtook it. In that union legislation, for example, unions had the ability to adopt, and share debts and fortunes.
Hello everyone, the other thread reached almost 2000 posts and 192 pages!!!!
It had to be closed because at around 2000 post it becomes taxing on the server, thanks independent_thinker2002
...
Alright heres the most current update and lets have fun!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICIAL COUNTER
how many sound, reasonable, logical, non-bias, non-selfish, non-arrogant, non-hypercritical, non anti-american reason are there to "Stop" gay marriage
GOOD REASONS: 0
well i have no clue who you are, i must of destroyed your posts quick.
ill ask again what policies are those
What real effect does calling it marriage have on you?
Were unions (same-sex, for example,) deprived of advantages of marriages? Only the word, marriage was deprived.
What policies what were?
None, but then you'd have to call hetero marriages unions as well.What effect do calling a same-sex union have on me? Would be like this simile: calling a Boston Red Sox fan a New York Yankee baseball fan. And the gov't is determining that certain religion's beliefs are inconsequential.
What real effect does calling a same-sex union a union have on you?
The premise that something must have an effect on my personally is incorrect. Calling a dog a cat and a cat a dog has no effect on me either but that doesn't mean it's correct or accurate to do so.
No, not right to stop it. There is no reasonable argument against it as you have suggested. Frankly, I'm tired of hearing about this issue. If it isn't a common place right soon, it will be when my generation takes the reigns of power.
What policies what were? What are you referring to? If of some post of mine, please reply with pertinent info of mine.
The act of homosexual sex is wrong.......It goes against everything God teaches.
No. It applies here because it doesn't impact you or your marriage. However it does impact same sex couples because you're telling them they're not equal. You're concerned about accuracy? Well then, why not make it fair, call them both unions since it is accurate to do so.The premise that something must have an effect on my personally is incorrect. Calling a dog a cat and a cat a dog has no effect on me either but that doesn't mean it's correct or accurate to do so.
Way to necro a post from 2011 guys. WTG! :lamo
I agree i give it 5 years max
1.)Honestly, philosophically I believe that they already have this right as it is unalienable. What's the quote? Americans can always be counted on to do the right thing...after they have exhausted all other possibilities.- Winston Churchill
I also believe government incentives for marriage generally should be abolished. It's not like we have a shortage of babies or something, and these are the chief arguments by reasonable people with an objection to our position.
1.)Like I posted before, equalize the rights between unions and marriages and then there'll be equal rights.
2.)When the gov't forces every union to be a marriage, this goes against the religion portion of the first amendment (gov't shall not set up a 'state' religion).
Ok you're concerned about accuracy. Well then, why not make it fair, call them both unions since it is accurate to do so.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?