Gabbard To Release More Obama Russiagate Files, 'Cannot Fathom' How Durham, Mueller Missed Evidence Of 'Years-Long Coup'

[Jezcoe]

Not ego but a desire to let them sleep in the bed they made. More anger that THEIR decision allowed what was happening to happen.

It was their fault that Trump lied to his supporters to a point where they attacked the Capitol.

Cool.

 

[soap box]

There is no constitutional obligation in place stating that a president must do x y z to declassify.

None of what you posted matters. Absolutely zero. Classified documents are not personal property. A president can only take personal items away but a president has no right to possess things that are not personally his.

PRA- It's the law, The law splits everything into two categories: presidential or personal.

The US owns the official and presidential records, not the president after he leaves office.

The Act establishes that Presidential records automatically transfer into the legal custody of the Archivist.

The president and his staff must take all practical steps to separate presidential items from personal ones.

As soon as the President leaves office, the Archivist takes legal custody of all records.

44 U.S.C.

§ 2202,
"U.S. reserves "complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records".

(3) The term "personal records" means all documentary materials, or any reasonably segregable portion thereof, of a purely private or nonpublic character which do not relate to or have an effect upon the carrying out of the constitutional, statutory, or other official or ceremonial duties of the President.

Transfer of custody: § 2203(g)(1)
"The Archivist of the United States is required to take exclusive legal and physical custody of these records from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) as soon as the president leaves office."

§ 2203. Management and custody of Presidential records
(g)(1) Upon the conclusion of a President’s term of office, or if a President serves consecutive terms upon the conclusion of the last term, the Archivist of the United States shall assume responsibility for the custody, control, and preservation of, and access to, the Presidential records of that President.


It doesn't matter who declassified what or when
Any official or presidential document cannot possibly be a personal item. A president cannot own anything that wasn't already theirs after the end of their term. Period. No more blah blah blah about this.


He didn't even know what documents he took. There was never a complete inventory at Maralago. He can't declassify something if he doesn't even know what it is.


I posted the law itself and it's as if they were writing that law, and they knew someone would exploit the office of the presidency. Hmmm, maybe they were thinking of .... hmmm .. Nixon?

Yeah the big display was 30 agents and 15 vehicles to get 30 boxes and dig thru a woman’s underwear drawer. It’s all over the internet and readily available since you didn’t actually see it when it was happening. What the top story for days or longer.

Nah I don’t have to find anything. If you don’t believe it just look for yourself. You do know the difference between a duty pistol and a service rifle, yes?

I couldn't find any indication of your claims either. Thanks

They still would have arrested and charged him. Who are you kidding? Thankfully they allowed their TDS to hoverride the last bit of respect for our constitution and they had. The lawfare won Trump the election.

It's impossible to say that a singular category of events won the election.

How many voters were paying attention anyway?

If you say lawfare you can say why. What charges against him do you think are not supported by the evidence? If you can't say, then it was due process.

 

[soap box]

Neither can you bud. Neither can you.

My answer is sincere and evidence that I wouldn’t make a good politician.

He wanted the riot to continue. Giuliani revealed why. You might notice he mentions "slow" "time", "rush" "into tomorrow"

0:32

 

[Daddyo]

It is of my best interest to not vote for a ****ing traitor piece of shit. MAGA are the enemy of the American people. MAGA are reduced to the hard core nutjobs as everyone sees what is behind the curtain. The more MAGA is allowed to speak, the more that MAGA loses supporters. Their days are numbered.

MAGA is currently fixing the mess your second to last vote caused. MAGA is returning manufacturing to this country. MAGA has lowered taxes. MAGA has ended several wars saving thousands of lives. MAGA has fixed the border. MAGA has given DC its first week without a murder in decades meaning someone, very likely a Democrat, is alive today that would have been killed.

MAGA grows bigger and stronger by the day. Sorry for your obvious TDS bud. I am MAGA. My family is MAGA. Most of my friends are MAGA. Nothing you said above about MAGA is correct. The opposite is true. Above you speak of leftist filth not MAGA. Hope I helped you fix this issue.

 

[Daddyo]

There were no questions. There was nothing on his long form, that wasn't on his short form, in regards to qualifying for the office of president.

Doesn’t matter how the issue began. What matters is how it was allowed to fester for political purposes. Obama had the ability to end it very easily and chose not to for three years, why? The answer is because he wanted the racism issue to shield his administration.

 

[Daddyo]

Except no one declined Trump's "offer."

What does this mean????

“

• Contradictory House testimony from former Pentagon officials: Some former officials within the Pentagon have testified in House hearings that they received directives from Trump before January 6th to ensure the day was peaceful and to use the National Guard if needed. These officials suggested that Pentagon leadership delayed the deployment due to concerns about "optics". ”

To me it means he offered the guard if needed. It suggests that some feared the guard would make it look like a coup was taking place. I doubt Trump gives a shit what you folks think so I highly doubt that Trump worried about optics.

 

[Daddyo]

I just tried to remind myself of this conversation, but realized it happened over a week ago. Enjoy your angry rant.

Enjoy your TDS.

Answering is tough for you anyway lol.

 

[Daddyo]

It wouldn't have been an issue if many rural folks weren't so offended at a potential black president with a funny name. That's where this whole thing starts, their being offended that people outside of their small towns and small cultures actually exist.

Race card once again. It’s losing power each and every day bud. Soon you will have nothing left but your parties horrible policies to protect you lol. And that’s not working out to well is it?

 

[NOLA Dude]

 

[Slartibartfast]

Enjoy your TDS.

Answering is tough for you anyway lol.

Ahh "TDS" and "Race Card", the utterance of a MAGA when they don't have an actual argument but want to feel good emotions. This means I made my point.

 

[soap box]

It's obvious no one should pay any attention to a debate by X, and especially if it's sperry.

 

[Lethargic Aptitude]

MAGA is currently fixing the mess your second to last vote caused. MAGA is returning manufacturing to this country. MAGA has lowered taxes. MAGA has ended several wars saving thousands of lives. MAGA has fixed the border. MAGA has given DC its first week without a murder in decades meaning someone, very likely a Democrat, is alive today that would have been killed.

MAGA grows bigger and stronger by the day. Sorry for your obvious TDS bud. I am MAGA. My family is MAGA. Most of my friends are MAGA. Nothing you said above about MAGA is correct. The opposite is true. Above you speak of leftist filth not MAGA. Hope I helped you fix this issue.

You are just repeating the propaganda that was shoveled into your head. No logic, no personal thoughts, just follow the leader to hell.

 

[Lethargic Aptitude]

So you voted for Hillary, Biden, and Harris lol.

How about in 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008, and 2012? No orange man lol. Very curious lol.

Americans do not ask Americans who they voted for. It's a long held tradition. Perhaps you did not know, in any case I will not bend to your authoritarian needs.

 

[Daddyo]

Obama should never have released anything. He didn't owe the racist ****wits anything, and the fact that you're still whining about it today just proves that point completely.

I didn’t bring it up bud. One of your leftist comrades did. Obama himself was the one whining about it while he could have ended it nearly instantly. He didn’t want to because he wanted the issue.

It worked lol. Look at you to this day calling anyone who wanted proof a racist. Pathetic. Opposing Bill Clinton was ok. Oppose obama and you are a racist lol. Thankfully the days of democrats politics of charging the right with racism and sexism and homophobia are done. Folks just done believe you anymore. You cried wolf once two many.

 

[Daddyo]

And Obama dam sure will never release his college transcripts.

They are very community organizer average.

He always portrayed himself as smarter and better than everyone else. He was above it all. Now we see that he was nothing more than a banana republic socialist willing to shit on our constitution for power. A community organizer who sought to fundamentally transform our country. Now it appears that he did by using government power against a political opponent. Dark shit man.

Maybe we should just do the same shit to them! **** it. They don’t have an issue with it. What’s good for the goose!

 

[Daddyo]

What are you even talking about?

The lawfare.

 

[Daddyo]

Yes , and who was president in 2018, 2019,2020? Is there any report or investigation with any conclusion or accusation that uses the Dossier as a source?

So the trump administration FBI still believed in the Steele dossier? That's amazing that the Trump FBI believed the Dossier more than the Obama administration did!

You asked and I answered.

 

[Daddyo]

My computer can beat up your computer.


Why didn't you ask it what assessments were changed as a result of corroborrating evidence collected after the election? Like this -


Prompt -
What assessments in the 2017 ICA were changed as a result of further corroborated information after the election?



iask.ai/ -
" While the core conclusions of the ICA remained largely consistent, subsequent information and further analysis reinforced and provided additional detail for several key assessments.

The fundamental findings regarding Russian interference, including cyber operations against political parties and the use of state-run propaganda, have been consistently reaffirmed by various investigations and reports"

According to www.iAsk.Ai - Ask AI: The 2017 ICA's assessments regarding Russian efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election, particularly concerning the extent of social media manipulation and the support for the judgment that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered the influence campaign, were bolstered by further corroborated information after the election."

***

Gemini -

The Senate Intelligence Committee's report on the matter, which was a bipartisan effort, largely affirmed the findings of the ICA, including the judgment on Putin's preference for Trump. The Senate report stated that the intelligence community's judgments were "well-reasoned, consistent with observed Russian behavior, and properly documented."

After the ICA's publication, further details emerged that bolstered its initial assessments.

For example:
Russian activities against state election infrastructure: The ICA pointed to initial evidence of Russian activities against multiple state and local election boards. Subsequent investigations by the Senate Intelligence Committee revealed a more extensive Russian effort to infiltrate state election infrastructure.

Internet Research Agency (IRA) activities: The ICA briefly discussed the activities of the IRA, a Russian troll farm. Further investigation exposed a far more extensive effort by the IRA to manipulate social media to sow discord and interfere in the 2016 election and American society"

***
That's why I keep asking what assessment was changed. No assessment was really changed, the answer is none . The same assessments were repetitive ad nauseum, inspected and verified and Obama wanted the conclusions in the ICA. People have a right to know. Obama did the right thing.

That's why no assessment really changed. The same assessments were reinforced and the ICA needed to show just what the hell was going on with the damn ruskies.


.

Btw, Ex CIA says Gabby's full o' crap, just fyi,

Ex-CIA analyst challenges Trump's attempt to discredit Russian election interference probe

The Trump administration is trying to discredit the intelligence assessment that concluded Russian President Putin ordered a campaign to interfere in the 2016 election with the intent of helping elect Trump. Contrary to almost all intelligence findings, Trump and his aides allege a conspiracy by...

www.pbs.org

Why did Obama ask for a new assessment?

What did change in the new assessment?

I already answered both. Obama asked that the ways Russia tried to influence our election be highlighted in the new assessment. He did so with the intention of that intelligence assessment giving weight and credibility to the Russian collusion attack being aimed at Trump. He did so even though the original assessment said Russia was unsuccessful. That bud is called conspiracy.

 

[Daddyo]

I mean, how easy is it to con MAGA? It's like taking candy from a baby.

Says the guy who believed Harris ****ed an old man from attraction and not to advance her political career lol.

Says the guy who believed Harris was pro fracking when she flip flopped on the issue and was desperate to get elected.

You probably fell for the Russian collusion hoax as well.

You probably believed that hunters laptop was Russian disinformation.

And the biggest gem of all…..you very likely believed that Joe Biden’s brain was not the warm apple sauce we constantly told you it was.

Another leftist confession lol.

 

[Slartibartfast]

The lawfare.

Oh, you are just going on about conspiracy theories. No wonder your argument made no sense.

 

[Daddyo]

So you have proof or you don't?

I have enough proof for me. That doesn’t seem to be enough proof for you.

See I understand that there is only one logical reason to have another assessment made.

Especially just to highlight the methods Russia used to attack our elections.

Add that Strzok and Page worked closely with Obama on the Hillary Russia server hacking issue.

And Strzok telling Page that “THEY” had an insurance policy should Trump win just puts it all together.

I would bet the farm.

 

[Daddyo]

LOL Gabby and Patel haven't investigated anything so how do they have evidence of anything? They don't have squat.

Did your AI figure out that Obama didn't change an assessment, but actually emphasized the new evidence for same conclusions?

Did you figure out why Obama felt that it was necessary to make a new assessment with virtually zero changes?

Did you figure out that these changes ironically give weight to the Trump Russia collusion lie that was being put in motion at the time?

Did you ever figure out what the insurance policy that Strzok told his girlfriend Page that “they” had should Trump be elected?

You don’t need AI either bud just logic and an open mind that’s not all eat up with TDS.

 

[soap box]

The FBI!

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/pr...led-congress-on-reliability-of-steele-dossier

2018.

That's nothing but another BS editorial from the lying Senate committee of NOW. That's not the committee before, any trump committee now has zero credibility. Read the weak suace crap.

You asked and I answered.

You answered with the current committee when it's obvious they are totally lying for Trump.

 

[The AntiDonald]

Gathering and examining the information takes time.

This was only discovered a few days ago.

Sure. Just like all the fraud that DoGE found. All lies. Not one single case filed for fraud. What the ****?

Explain that.

 

[soap box]

Why did Obama ask for a new assessment?

What did change in the new assessment?

I already answered both. Obama asked that the ways Russia tried to influence our election be highlighted in the new assessment.

Yes, with the same conclusions and findings as before, with more than enough evidence,

He did so with the intention of that intelligence assessment giving weight and credibility to the Russian collusion attack being aimed at Trump. He did so even though the original assessment said Russia was unsuccessful. That bud is called conspiracy.

LOL, no , you've got Gabbys conspiracy theory.

Find the text in the ICA that makes any claim at all about the impact of Russian interference. Post that here.

It was about intent. The IC wrote that there is no way to measure the impact of their attempts. Why do you keep repeating that when it's irrelevant? The results of Russian interference are not the question because no one can say what the effect actually was.

Let's review - the claim was that Obama made them lie and change the conclusions. That's Gabbys conspiracy.

Everything in the ICA is true. You never said what conclusions or findings were changed. Their assessment still hasn't changed and is still true.

You still can't answer:
What assessments (conclusions, findings) were changed?