Gabbard To Release More Obama Russiagate Files, 'Cannot Fathom' How Durham, Mueller Missed Evidence Of 'Years-Long Coup'

mike2810 · Monday at 9:59 AM

Daddyo said:
Don’t know or care why they chose 1/6. Nothing Trump said that day caused the riot that day.

Your support for assassinations is irrelevant. Someone in your party acted out because of the rotten rhetoric from your party. This must be the case since you believe words caused 1/6. The words your comrades used were far more incendiary than anything Trump said. Not to mention Joe Biden saying to put Trump in the bullseye just days before someone put him in the crosshairs.

Let me ask you something,
- Do all Republicans agree 100% of the time on all issues? Yes / No?
- Do all Trump supporters agree 100% of the time on all issues? Yes / No?

The reason I ask this question is you have assumed because I disagree with President Trump, the GOP, or Trump supporters on some issues you assumed that I belong to the other "Party". Sorry, you are wrong.

Every ask yourself why Trump and hissupporters held the rally on 1/6 at that location? The rally could have been held a few weeks before the EC counting in Congress.

Daddyo said:
The facts are as follows. Democrats have multiple violent events across the country over the years to include the murder and two attempts to murder a political opponent. We are talking hundreds of billions in damage, explosives, gun shots, fire bombs, hundreds of injured, and more than 20 killed. Republicans have one event, Jan 6th which was nothing more than a riot at the whitehouse. The only death was caused by police shooting a rioter.

this is spin. Not all "events" you are trying to describe were political rallies.

Daddyo said:
Democrats have used words like fight and have claimed the 2016 election was stolen and no one is calling that a call to insurrection. Just for Trump lol.

True, as well as the GOP have used the words, Independents and other political parties.

Daddyo said:
BTW I spend 11 days sleeping in my gun shop because of democrats during the floyd riots. Prevented multiple attempts to break into that gun shop. The wind shield on my vehicle was shot in that 11 day stretch. I know all about some of that democrat violence.

Good for you protecting your property.
I do not support riots. Do you support the police action that ended in Floyd's death?

soap box · Monday at 10:01 AM

Daddyo said:
The coup attempt was in 2017 thru 2018 as the Dems sought to impeach Trump over the Russian collusion LIE that Obama and Hillary manufactured.

What was manufactured?

element94 · Monday at 10:48 AM

Peter said:
Only Trump is immune.

I'll take that as rightful sarcasm.
But:
All presidents for official acts, and I would say looking into contact by a candidate with a foreign government during an election comes under official act. Geo. Washington warned about usurpers beholden to foreign governments trying to become president (and blamed political parties for it, saying they were ripe for corruption!). If anything, it will bring more out about the criminal corrupt Trump.

Daddyo · Monday at 11:01 AM

Jagged said:
Actually, he assumed they would march to the Capitol peacefully, which they did. It was once they got there, that they fought like hell to "stop the steal."

You have no idea what he assumed. According to people like you, before the truth came out, you were all accusing him of ordering it. Then after told that he offered the national guard it all changed to Trump incited it. OMG he used the words fight like hell then video comes out with dozens of democrats saying the same shit with zero complaints by the left. OMG he said the election was stolen then video comes out with a dozen prominent democrats saying the 2016 election was stolen. Just admit that this whole deal is nothing but politics and hypocrisy. It’s all your side has these days.

soap box · Monday at 11:05 AM

Daddyo said:
You have no idea what he assumed. According to people like you, before the truth came out, you were all accusing him of ordering it. Then after told that he offered the national guard it all changed to Trump incited it. OMG he used the words fight like hell then video comes out with dozens of democrats saying the same shit with zero complaints by the left. OMG he said the election was stolen then video comes out with a dozen prominent democrats saying the 2016 election was stolen. Just admit that this whole deal is nothing but politics and hypocrisy. It’s all your side has these days.

Are you able to say what the manufactured things were? Since the ICA is true, what was manufactured?

Jezcoe · Monday at 11:10 AM

Daddyo said:
You have no idea what he assumed. According to people like you, before the truth came out, you were all accusing him of ordering it. Then after told that he offered the national guard it all changed to Trump incited it. OMG he used the words fight like hell then video comes out with dozens of democrats saying the same shit with zero complaints by the left. OMG he said the election was stolen then video comes out with a dozen prominent democrats saying the 2016 election was stolen. Just admit that this whole deal is nothing but politics and hypocrisy. It’s all your side has these days.

If Trump thought that the gathering was going to be peaceful… then why would he order in the National Guard?

When it did turn violent… why did he wait a couple of hours before doing anything about it?

Sidd Finch · Monday at 11:29 AM

Daddyo said:
You have no idea what he assumed. According to people like you, before the truth came out, you were all accusing him of ordering it. Then after told that he offered the national guard it all changed to Trump incited it. OMG he used the words fight like hell then video comes out with dozens of democrats saying the same shit with zero complaints by the left. OMG he said the election was stolen then video comes out with a dozen prominent democrats saying the 2016 election was stolen. Just admit that this whole deal is nothing but politics and hypocrisy. It’s all your side has these days.

According to some people that were arrested, they were there specifically at the direction of Trump.

"But, the Democrats!!" Blah blah blah

iguanaman · Monday at 11:35 AM

redbeer said:
You know what's so surprising about all of this? All of this was well known for most on the right having more reliable information, yet even with all this mounting evidence coming forth, those on the left are not in the least bit upset for being misled by government officials and the media. One would think, those with higher intelligence would be thinking about how not to be led astray and would want justice on those who caused them to believe lie after lie and for years. Idk, maybe they like being misled, lied to, and made to look like a fool.

Sorry but listening to Gabbard (a known Russia tool) on these matter makes you look like fools. This is hardly the first time that she has repeated Russian disinformation. Do you also believe that Iran was not developing a nuclear weapon like she testified only a few months ago?

But former advisers to Gabbard suggest that her views on Russia and its polarizing leader, Vladimir Putin, have been shaped not by some covert intelligence recruitment as far as they know -- but instead by her unorthodox media consumption habits.

Three former aides said Gabbard, who left the Democratic Party in 2022, regularly read and shared articles from the Russian news site RT -- formerly known as Russia Today -- which the U.S. intelligence community characterized in 2017 as "the Kremlin's principal international propaganda outlet."

While it was not clear to those former staffers whether or when she stopped frequenting the site, one former aide said Gabbard continued to circulate articles from RT "long after" she was advised that the outlet was not a credible source of information.

Doug London, a retired 34-year veteran intelligence officer, said Gabbard's alleged penchant to rely at least in part on outlets like RT to shape her view of the world reflects poorly on her suitability to fulfill the responsibilities of a director of national intelligence.

"That Gabbard's views mirror Russia's narrative and disinformation themes can but suggest naïveté, collusion, or politically opportunistic sycophancy to echo whatever she believes Trump wants to hear," London said, adding, "none of which bodes well for the president's principal intelligence adviser responsible for enabling the [U.S. intelligence community] to inform decision-making by telling it like it is."

https://abcnews.go.com/US/gabbards-...-kremlin-propaganda-outlet/story?id=116430097

Gabbard and White House 'lying' about intel on Russian interference in 2016, ex-CIA official says

"We definitely had the intel," Susan Miller, who helped oversee the 2017 intelligence assessment of Russia's efforts in the 2016 election, told NBC News.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/na...ian-interference-2016-ex-cia-offic-rcna220870

Jagged · Monday at 12:16 PM

Daddyo said:
So Trump makes a mistake and he is a liar. Carroll say she is going to get Trump for political reasons and she didn’t mean that lol. Give me a ****ing break. The bitch actually told you that she was going to make shit up (scheme) to get Trump and you believed her lol.

We know that Carroll was lying because she said that she was going to get him AS PART OF HER CIVIC DUTY lol. So she was looking to hurt him politically. Then she made the claim.

That wasn't just a mistake. It unraveled his defense. As evidence he didn't sexually assault her, he claimed she wasn't his type. That mistake proved she really was his type and exposed him as the liar he is.

Jagged · Monday at 12:18 PM

Daddyo said:
If you are that interested do your homework on it. I merely showed you that they believe it’s possible.

<laughing>

I already know the answer. I was just making fun of your absurd position.

trixare4kids · Monday at 12:19 PM

Jagged said:
Trump's attorney was already convicted for his participation.

....but you weren't talking about Trump's attorney.

Jagged · Monday at 12:22 PM

Daddyo said:
Why? It probably saved our country. At least for a few years anyway.

See had Trump won in 2020 as he should have, he wouldn’t have had the mandate that he is currently using to repair our country. He wouldn’t have had the time to figure out how he went wrong and how to get shit done while your comrades try everything to stop him. The democrats party wouldn’t be in the sewer right now. The fake news wouldn’t be as weak as they are right now.

So many things came from your side cheating that I have to say thanks to the thieves actually.

I'm good with what Trump is doing. He's ****ing both parties.

Jagged · Monday at 12:30 PM

Daddyo said:
No he released a certification of live birth first. Then after it became an issue he released the long form version. The one we all know about not the short version.

The long form was a certificate of live birth. Both documents came from the same birth records. He presented his short form copy while running for president and it clearly showed he was born in the U.S.. That was all he needed to do.

Jagged · Monday at 12:37 PM

Daddyo said:
You have no idea what he assumed. According to people like you, before the truth came out, you were all accusing him of ordering it. Then after told that he offered the national guard it all changed to Trump incited it. OMG he used the words fight like hell then video comes out with dozens of democrats saying the same shit with zero complaints by the left. OMG he said the election was stolen then video comes out with a dozen prominent democrats saying the 2016 election was stolen. Just admit that this whole deal is nothing but politics and hypocrisy. It’s all your side has these days.

Of course I know he assumed that. He literally said, "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard."

You have no idea what kind of people I am like, meaning you wasted your bandwidth by guessing what I said. You should stop ASSuming.

Jagged · Monday at 12:41 PM

trixare4kids said:
....but you weren't talking about Trump's attorney.

You said the accusation about Trump had to be proven on court to show it's a violation of the law. I pointed out to you, his attorney was convicted of the same charge, as they were both working together to use fake electors to flip the election Trump lost.

eohrnberger · Monday at 12:42 PM

iguanaman said:
Sorry but listening to Gabbard (a known Russia tool) on these matter makes you look like fools. This is hardly the first time that she has repeated Russian disinformation. Do you also believe that Iran was not developing a nuclear weapon like she testified only a few months ago?

But former advisers to Gabbard suggest that her views on Russia and its polarizing leader, Vladimir Putin, have been shaped not by some covert intelligence recruitment as far as they know -- but instead by her unorthodox media consumption habits.

Three former aides said Gabbard, who left the Democratic Party in 2022, regularly read and shared articles from the Russian news site RT -- formerly known as Russia Today -- which the U.S. intelligence community characterized in 2017 as "the Kremlin's principal international propaganda outlet."

While it was not clear to those former staffers whether or when she stopped frequenting the site, one former aide said Gabbard continued to circulate articles from RT "long after" she was advised that the outlet was not a credible source of information.

Doug London, a retired 34-year veteran intelligence officer, said Gabbard's alleged penchant to rely at least in part on outlets like RT to shape her view of the world reflects poorly on her suitability to fulfill the responsibilities of a director of national intelligence.

"That Gabbard's views mirror Russia's narrative and disinformation themes can but suggest naïveté, collusion, or politically opportunistic sycophancy to echo whatever she believes Trump wants to hear," London said, adding, "none of which bodes well for the president's principal intelligence adviser responsible for enabling the [U.S. intelligence community] to inform decision-making by telling it like it is."

https://abcnews.go.com/US/gabbards-...-kremlin-propaganda-outlet/story?id=116430097

Gabbard and White House 'lying' about intel on Russian interference in 2016, ex-CIA official says
"We definitely had the intel," Susan Miller, who helped oversee the 2017 intelligence assessment of Russia's efforts in the 2016 election, told NBC News.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/na...ian-interference-2016-ex-cia-offic-rcna220870

"Gabbard is a Russian Agent" redux? Oh please. CT forums are ==>> that'a way, with a bunch of other innuendo based smearing.

iguanaman · Monday at 12:47 PM

eohrnberger said:
"Gabbard is a Russian Agent" redux? Oh please. CT forums are ==>> that'a way, with a bunch of other innuendo based smearing.

Well since that is all this attack on Obama is I thought why not join the club? Gabbard has a long history of repeating Russian disinformation and you know it. Do you also believe that Iran is not developing Nuclear weapons like Gabbard also claimed?

Jagged · Monday at 12:49 PM

eohrnberger said:
"Gabbard is a Russian Agent" redux? Oh please. CT forums are ==>> that'a way, with a bunch of other innuendo based smearing.

The Gabbard hoax is flailing. Now what?

element94 · Monday at 12:53 PM

Sidd Finch said:
According to some people that were arrested, they were there specifically at the direction of Trump.

"But, the Democrats!!" Blah blah blah

"We're going to the Capitol" -Donald J. Trump January 6, 2021
Who could have ever imagined how out of hand it would get?/s

element94 · Monday at 12:59 PM