Gabbard To Release More Obama Russiagate Files, 'Cannot Fathom' How Durham, Mueller Missed Evidence Of 'Years-Long Coup'

[soap box]

Gathering and examining the information takes time.

This was only discovered a few days ago.

What did Obama do? Do you know what this is about?

 

[j brown's body]

 

[soap box]

The coverup is being uncovered. Much like peeling an onion. The DNI Director Gabbard’s believes that there was a broad effort to coverup the evidence left in the wake from deploying the Russian Investigation hoax.

——————————————-

"There is no rational or logical explanation for why they failed," she said, adding "The only logical conclusion that I can draw in this … is that there was direct intent to cover up the truth about what occurred and who was responsible and the broad network of how this seditious conspiracy was concocted and who exactly was responsible for carrying it out."

“Among other things, Gabbard's team unearthed a Sept. 12, 2016 intelligence community assessment that "foreign adversaries do not have and will probably not obtain the capabilities to successfully execute widespread and undetected cyber attacks" on election systems.”

That's correct, they weren't able to infiltrate infrastructure, but they tried.

“At the time, Russia was being accused of setting up troll farms and hacking the DNC email servers (Seth who?).”

They did. So what's the claim?

“And of course, once legitimized by the Obama administration, a steady stream of leaks suggesting that Russia was behind Trump's 2016 victory started appearing in the Washington Post and other outlets in "sweeping and systemic fashion."

That's a leak? It's called an editorial.

Gabbard To Release More Obama Russiagate Files, 'Cannot Fathom' How Durham, Mueller Missed Evidence Of 'Years-Long Coup' | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

Can you we explain what any of this is about?

 

[j brown's body]

That's correct, they weren't able to infiltrate infrastructure, but they tried.


They did. So what's the claim?


That's a leak? It's called an editorial.



Can you we explain what any of this is about?

Conspiracy theories flow through them like waste water through a sewer.

 

[roberthughey]

What did Obama do? Do you know what this is about?

The documents being discussed by Gabbard have his hands all over them.

 

[soap box]

The documents being discussed by Gabbard have his hands all over them.

And I'm trying to get a handle on what the claim really is. I don't see how any of those documents show any impropriety. Do you know anyone who can explain this?

 

[roberthughey]

And I'm trying to get a handle on what the claim really is. I don't see how any of those documents show any impropriety. Do you know anyone who can explain this?

Not much coming out of the media.

It would be considered a positive news story for Trump, so next to no interest from the media to cover it.

 

[ataraxia]

Hard to imagine from the proven propaganda and treasonous activities from Democrat politicians and our intelligence agencies that there are people who still believe the 2020 election was fair......amazing, to say the least. A demented, corrupt politician received 86 million votes legitimately, lol. Stupid is, as stupid does...at least says Forrest Gump.

Yep, plus he was a 34 count felon and rapist. Historically unprecedented.

 

[VySky]

That's correct, they weren't able to infiltrate infrastructure, but they tried.

They always try. Nothing new

They did. So what's the claim?

No they didn't CloudStrike confirmed this.

That's a leak? It's called an editorial.

Multiple false assertions.

 

[soap box]

They always try. Nothing new


No they didn't CloudStrike confirmed this.

The Internet Research Agency is based in Russia and Putin controls everything about it. When did cloustrike say anything about it?

Multiple false assertions.

That was an editorial, not daily news.

Do you understand any of this. I read the docs and I don't see the problem. Can you explain what Gabbard wants?

 

[CaughtInThe]

The coverup is being uncovered. Much like peeling an onion. The DNI Director Gabbard’s believes that there was a broad effort to coverup the evidence left in the wake from deploying the Russian Investigation hoax.

——————————————-

"There is no rational or logical explanation for why they failed," she said, adding "The only logical conclusion that I can draw in this … is that there was direct intent to cover up the truth about what occurred and who was responsible and the broad network of how this seditious conspiracy was concocted and who exactly was responsible for carrying it out."

“Among other things, Gabbard's team unearthed a Sept. 12, 2016 intelligence community assessment that "foreign adversaries do not have and will probably not obtain the capabilities to successfully execute widespread and undetected cyber attacks" on election systems.”

“At the time, Russia was being accused of setting up troll farms and hacking the DNC email servers (Seth who?).”

“And of course, once legitimized by the Obama administration, a steady stream of leaks suggesting that Russia was behind Trump's 2016 victory started appearing in the Washington Post and other outlets in "sweeping and systemic fashion."

Gabbard To Release More Obama Russiagate Files, 'Cannot Fathom' How Durham, Mueller Missed Evidence Of 'Years-Long Coup' | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

 

[soap box]

They always try. Nothing new


No they didn't CloudStrike confirmed this.

Hidden Over 2 Years: Dem Cyber-Firm's Sworn Testimony It Had No Proof of Russian Hack of DNC

CrowdStrike, the private cyber-security firm that first accused Russia of hacking Democratic Party emails and served as a critical source for U.S. intelligence officials in the years-long Trump-Russia

www.realclearinvestigations.com

They confirmed that they don't have evidence of a hack. That's not the same as an extensive industrial scale army of bots and fake social media accounts in order to spread misinformation.

Putin and the Russians very certainly conducted a campaign of propaganda in social media before the 2016 election.

 

[Kelby]

The Internet Research Agency is based in Russia and Putin controls everything about it. When did cloustrike say anything about it?

That was an editorial, not daily news.

Do you understand any of this. I read the docs and I don't see the problem. Can you explain what Ga bbard wants?

To get Trump's base in a froth by throwing out buzzwords like "treason", " coup", and "indictment" about a political rival...the words do not need to have any connection to reality.

 

[SCrider]

You know what's so surprising about all of this? All of this was well known for most on the right having more reliable information, yet even with all this mounting evidence coming forth, those on the left are not in the least bit upset for being misled by government officials and the media. One would think, those with higher intelligence would be thinking about how not to be led astray and would want justice on those who caused them to believe lie after lie and for years. Idk, maybe they like being misled, lied to, and made to look like a fool.

what is surprising is that you all will fall for this again.

A real investigation is done quietly until they have the information they need to make an indictment.

This is a deflection to keep PEDO don out of the news cycle.

 

[Daddyo]

Fox News is part of the media and they admitted they lied.


Maybe Trump can resurrect Trump University and team with Liberty University. This way people will be scammed and remain stupid.

The rest lie daily. And much of what FOX admitted to in the settlement in order to limit their exposure was later found to actually be possible. Dominion machines could be made to switch votes and more.

Now perhaps you have a few more on FOX. I have dozens on your fake news. All manner of lies, purposeful omissions, and coordinated attacks coming from your fake news propagandists. Your fake news garbage is precisely why FOX became such a powerhouse in cable news.

You vote for Harris? Were you scammed by her flip flopping and sudden switch to pro fracking? There are lots of ways to scam people. Leave it to a leftist to expect to become a billionaire builder after taking a trump university course lol. I attended bass pro shops BassMaster university years ago. Maybe I should sue since it didn’t transform me into a BassMaster professional lol. Pathetic.

 

[NatMorton]

That is not what I am talking about. I am talking about the evidence that supposedly showed that Hunter was making money off of his father’s name

You’re kidding, right?

 

[Showtime586]

The coverup is being uncovered. Much like peeling an onion. The DNI Director Gabbard’s believes that there was a broad effort to coverup the evidence left in the wake from deploying the Russian Investigation hoax.

——————————————-

"There is no rational or logical explanation for why they failed," she said, adding "The only logical conclusion that I can draw in this … is that there was direct intent to cover up the truth about what occurred and who was responsible and the broad network of how this seditious conspiracy was concocted and who exactly was responsible for carrying it out."

“Among other things, Gabbard's team unearthed a Sept. 12, 2016 intelligence community assessment that "foreign adversaries do not have and will probably not obtain the capabilities to successfully execute widespread and undetected cyber attacks" on election systems.”

“At the time, Russia was being accused of setting up troll farms and hacking the DNC email servers (Seth who?).”

“And of course, once legitimized by the Obama administration, a steady stream of leaks suggesting that Russia was behind Trump's 2016 victory started appearing in the Washington Post and other outlets in "sweeping and systemic fashion."

Gabbard To Release More Obama Russiagate Files, 'Cannot Fathom' How Durham, Mueller Missed Evidence Of 'Years-Long Coup' | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

More @VySky laughable deflection and desperation away from Trump's Epstein connection.

 

[Showtime586]

Where are the criminal charges? It's Trump's DoJ. You should demand that your leaders stop whining to the media and bring criminal charges. Put up or shut up.

Otherwise it kinda looks like they're just trying to manipulate you.

They are way past the "trying" part. Trump plays his Maga base for the idiots that they truly are.

 

[Daddyo]

Trump came up with birtherism, extorted Ukraine to fabricate false claims about the Bidens, lied that the 2020 election was stolen, and crafted a false elector scheme to steal an election. He's a serial and criminally convicted liar who has in dozens of instances threatened to imprison his political opponents. And he's currently trying to avoid implication in a massive sex abuse scandal. Why should we trust anything his administration comes up with about Obama a decade after the fact?

Some stuff is to funny. Other stuff is just plain hysterical.

Trump released the phone call between he and Zelinski proving there was no QPQ. Ironically Biden admitted to his QPQ on TV and you still supported him lol.

Trump threatens to imprison political opponents and you find this offensive. Your party just spent years manufacturing crimes in an attempt to imprison a political opponent and you were ok with it.

He has no implication in the Epstein case. You seem angry or offended that there was no release of the files. What I have a problem with is that you didn’t seem to give a shit for the years those who you supported had complete control and didn’t release anything. Yet more hypocrisy from you.

I don’t trust anything from either. I want the facts, the evidence. Then I can judge for myself. If there is evidence and a jury can be convinced who are you to criticize.

In fact as trumps jury convicted him I didn’t hear you complain about trust. This jury knew that Trump said his reason for paying off the porn whore was to save his family from the embarrassment yet there had to be intent to influence an election for it to be a crime. No way to prove intent without evidence. The only evidence was trumps own words and he claimed it was to save his family the embarrassment. In the past, before politics, he had done the same lol. Everyone already knew he was a manwhore anyway. Everything pointed to Trump being truthful when saying it was to save his family the embarrassment.

You didn’t complain about trust after trump’s civil trial jury found him liable for sexual assault even though the plaintiff openly bragged about her intent to scheme to get Trump in an effort to fulfill her civic duty to this country lol.

It’s as if they grabbed all the TDS suffering leftists here on DP and put them on his juries lol. Nothing but Trump hating idiots on his juries.

 

[Showtime586]

They are coming.

Sure they are. Right after Trump's healthcare plan to replace Obamacare.

 

[Showtime586]

Some stuff is to funny. Other stuff is just plain hysterical.

Trump released the phone call between he and Zelinski proving there was no QPQ. Ironically Biden admitted to his QPQ on TV and you still supported him lol.

Trump threatens to imprison political opponents and you find this offensive. Your party just spent years manufacturing crimes in an attempt to imprison a political opponent and you were ok with it.

He has no implication in the Epstein case. You seem angry or offended that there was no release of the files. What I have a problem with is that you didn’t seem to give a shit for the years those who you supported had complete control and didn’t release anything. Yet more hypocrisy from you.

I don’t trust anything from either. I want the facts, the evidence. Then I can judge for myself. If there is evidence and a jury can be convinced who are you to criticize.

In fact as trumps jury convicted him I didn’t hear you complain about trust. This jury knew that Trump said his reason for paying off the porn whore was to save his family from the embarrassment yet there had to be intent to influence an election for it to be a crime. No way to prove intent without evidence. The only evidence was trumps own words and he claimed it was to save his family the embarrassment. In the past, before politics, he had done the same lol. Everyone already knew he was a manwhore anyway. Everything pointed to Trump being truthful when saying it was to save his family the embarrassment.

You didn’t complain about trust after trump’s civil trial jury found him liable for sexual assault even though the plaintiff openly bragged about her intent to scheme to get Trump in an effort to fulfill her civic duty to this country lol.

It’s as if they grabbed all the TDS suffering leftists here on DP and put them on his juries lol. Nothing but Trump hating idiots on his juries.

Bullshit. The Zelinski phone call was edited and the written transcript was heavily redacted.

 

[SavannahMann]

The coverup is being uncovered. Much like peeling an onion. The DNI Director Gabbard’s believes that there was a broad effort to coverup the evidence left in the wake from deploying the Russian Investigation hoax.

——————————————-

"There is no rational or logical explanation for why they failed," she said, adding "The only logical conclusion that I can draw in this … is that there was direct intent to cover up the truth about what occurred and who was responsible and the broad network of how this seditious conspiracy was concocted and who exactly was responsible for carrying it out."

“Among other things, Gabbard's team unearthed a Sept. 12, 2016 intelligence community assessment that "foreign adversaries do not have and will probably not obtain the capabilities to successfully execute widespread and undetected cyber attacks" on election systems.”

“At the time, Russia was being accused of setting up troll farms and hacking the DNC email servers (Seth who?).”

“And of course, once legitimized by the Obama administration, a steady stream of leaks suggesting that Russia was behind Trump's 2016 victory started appearing in the Washington Post and other outlets in "sweeping and systemic fashion."

Gabbard To Release More Obama Russiagate Files, 'Cannot Fathom' How Durham, Mueller Missed Evidence Of 'Years-Long Coup' | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

So Trump in his first term was Catastrophically Incompetent by missing all of this? And he's the best we have?

 

[Daddyo]

I find it hard to believe the American public will not easily see through this. On the one hand you have a nonpartisan report prepared by a republican special investigator who himself was appointed by a GWB appointee. On the other hand you have Putin and Trump stooge Tulsi Gabbard.

But we'll see I guess, the American people have proven to be a massive disappointment over and over again when it comes to Trump.

Russian collusion was a lie. The American people saw through it and elected him again. The disappointment are folks like you that continue to be duped and manipulated by the lies of the left.

 

[Daddyo]

LOL, where did I post that?

Oh, so you think that the lies from leaders of the Democratic party are worse than the breadth and depth of Trump's non-stop lies.
Thank you for the excellent example of the power of the right wing angertainment algorithm.

Trump “lying” about how fast he would reduce food prices pales in comparison to Biden lying about his sons laptop being Russian collusion.

Trump “lying” about the size of his crowd is nothing compared to Harris saying she was suddenly pro fracking as she tried to get votes in Pennsylvania.

Trump “lying” about how he wasn’t colluding with Russia was discovered to be the truth. Lots of trumps “lies” turned out to be the truth lol.

 

[lynnwinslow]

Trump “lying” about how fast he would reduce food prices pales in comparison to Biden lying about his sons laptop being Russian collusion.

Trump “lying” about the size of his crowd is nothing compared to Harris saying she was suddenly pro fracking as she tried to get votes in Pennsylvania.

Trump “lying” about how he wasn’t colluding with Russia was discovered to be the truth. Lots of trumps “lies” turned out to be the truth lol.

2020 election was stolen
Covid is like the flu and it will disappear
Denied links between Russia and his campaign during the 2016 campaign
Mexico will pay for the wall