• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Gabbard To Release More Obama Russiagate Files, 'Cannot Fathom' How Durham, Mueller Missed Evidence Of 'Years-Long Coup'

Jan. 6th is kindergarten sandbox compared to what the corrupt democrats did in 2016. Hell, for that matter Jan. 6th was nothing compared to the riots of the democrats during the summer of 2020......there is no comparison. The Democrats are far more violent and corrupt than the Republicans.
Trump lied about the 2020 election, fomenting violence and trying to disenfranchise 81m Americans. It was Republicans marching in Charlottesville. It was Republicans beating on cops. The latter was in effort to steal an election.

Not Obama's fault that Trump is a traitor pos
 
Jan. 6th is kindergarten sandbox compared to what the corrupt democrats did in 2016. Hell, for that matter Jan. 6th was nothing compared to the riots of the democrats during the summer of 2020......there is no comparison. The Democrats are far more violent and corrupt than the Republicans.
MAGA literally wanted to hang the vice president, yet that is a kindergarten sandbox 🤣🤣🤣
 
According to the FoxNews and Zero Hedge articles I've read, the only thing the "evidence" so far shows is that the intelligence community did not think, months before the election, that Russia had the capability to hack voting systems for the purpose of changing votes. Which no one has ever claimed they did. But of course those articles immediately suggest this discredits everything about the Mueller investigation and post-election intelligence assessments. They count on their audiences being stupid and believing what they've been conditioned to believe.
 
According to the FoxNews and Zero Hedge articles I've read, the only thing the "evidence" so far shows is that the intelligence community did not think, months before the election, that Russia had the capability to hack voting systems for the purpose of changing votes. Which no one has ever claimed they did. But of course those articles immediately suggest this discredits everything about the Mueller investigation. They count on their audiences being stupid and believing what they've been conditioned to believe.
Are they counting on them being stupid or likely to carry the message?
 
No one is upset because this is just bullshit. Trump has been revealed as a child predator, so it's time to wave the black guy at the base, remind everyone why they're here in the first place.

Ya think maybe these PRESENT claims by Democrats of Trumo are of the same magnitude of "bullshit" as these PAST claims?
 
Ya think maybe these PRESENT claims by Democrats of Trumo are of the same magnitude of "bullshit" as these PAST claims?
Nope. Trump has a history of being a creepy sexual predator. And owes E Jean Carroll 90m for lying about raping her. And he's fantasized about ****ing Ivanka - remember when Stormy said he told her she reminded him of his daughter prior to ****ing her?

And everything Dems claimed about Trump turned out to be true.
 
Jan. 6th is kindergarten sandbox compared to what the corrupt democrats did in 2016. Hell, for that matter Jan. 6th was nothing compared to the riots of the democrats during the summer of 2020......there is no comparison. The Democrats are far more violent and corrupt than the Republicans.
You're right in the sense that Trump's attempt to deny the results of the 2020 election was very poorly managed. It's not that Trump has any qualms about lying to advance his goals. He's just not very good at it.
 
Isn't that a subjective assessment though? Which lies were "worse" is purely a matter of opinion. I prefer to write off both sides as being equally dishonest, manipulative, and untrustworthy. Basically, don't believe anything either of them say.
Actually, I said "as bad or worse," so we are mostly in agreement with our opinions.
 
Impact to the nation - lying about the President being healthiest ever and less than 6 months later its revealed his swollen ankles mean he has serious health issues is not an impact on the nation?
Which is a greater risk to the country, a President with swollen ankles or a President cognitively impaired?
 
The coverup is being uncovered. Much like peeling an onion. The DNI Director Gabbard’s believes that there was a broad effort to coverup the evidence left in the wake from deploying the Russian Investigation hoax.

——————————————-

"There is no rational or logical explanation for why they failed," she said, adding "The only logical conclusion that I can draw in this … is that there was direct intent to cover up the truth about what occurred and who was responsible and the broad network of how this seditious conspiracy was concocted and who exactly was responsible for carrying it out."

“Among other things, Gabbard's team unearthed a Sept. 12, 2016 intelligence community assessment that "foreign adversaries do not have and will probably not obtain the capabilities to successfully execute widespread and undetected cyber attacks" on election systems.”

“At the time, Russia was being accused of setting up troll farms and hacking the DNC email servers (Seth who?).”

“And of course, once legitimized by the Obama administration, a steady stream of leaks suggesting that Russia was behind Trump's 2016 victory started appearing in the Washington Post and other outlets in "sweeping and systemic fashion."

Up early to beat traffic on the way to the fishin' hole?
 
Nope. Trump has a history of being a creepy sexual predator. And owes E Jean Carroll 90m for lying about raping her. And he's fantasized about ****ing Ivanka - remember when Stormy said he told her she reminded him of his daughter prior to ****ing her?

And everything Dems claimed about Trump turned out to be true.

Quoting a professional escort ain't the way to do it.

In the meantime, the Dems claims that Trump was working as a Russian agent were false.
I suspect that these recent claims are as well.
 
THen Trump probably shouldn't have cheated on his pregnant wife with her.

The Democrats have long said morality should not be part of politics.

Granted, they said this when the subject was Clinton or Kennedy. But their conversion on the issue is a little too politically expedient.
 
Jan. 6th is kindergarten sandbox compared to what the corrupt democrats did in 2016. Hell, for that matter Jan. 6th was nothing compared to the riots of the democrats during the summer of 2020......there is no comparison. The Democrats are far more violent and corrupt than the Republicans.
Same involved with Crossfire Hurricane involved in orchastrating the 2020 election and January 6. Obama brought home the regime change skill set honed by our IC.

“Let me tell you, you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you.”

They did.......
 
Which is a greater risk to the country, a President with swollen ankles or a President cognitively impaired?
What if a president has both conditions?
 
Didn't miss it, suppressed it. Mueller never said Trump was guilty, never said he wasn't. Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report did not make a definitive determination.
  • Collusion: The report found insufficient evidence to conclude that the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government to influence the 2016 election. However, the report did detail that the Trump campaign "expected it would benefit electorally" from Russian hacking efforts and that there were "numerous links" between the campaign and the Russian government.
  • Obstruction of Justice: Mueller investigated multiple instances of potential obstruction of justice by President Trump but ultimately decided not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment on whether a crime was committed.
  • No Exoneration: While the report did not conclude that Trump committed a crime, it also explicitly stated that it "does not exonerate him".
  • Evidence Presented: The report laid out evidence on both sides of the obstruction question and left unresolved the "difficult issues" of law and fact concerning whether the president's actions and intent could be viewed as obstruction.
  • Department of Justice Policy: The Special Counsel's office accepted the Department of Justice policy that a sitting president cannot be indicted.
  • Barr's Conclusion: Attorney General William Barr and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein concluded that the evidence presented in the report was not sufficient to establish that the president committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.
generated by AI
 
How does it make you feel to being the victim of such atrocious propaganda by your party leaders and government agencies? They lied and you fell for it.

Yes, that's why now I'm going to stop listening to atrocious propaganda by my party leaders and government agencies and go chasing after cat eating Haitians, secret Kenyan birth certificates, cancer causing wind turbines, autism-inducing vaccines, genocidal S Africans, and other odds and ends.

You're not gonna believe what Trump's top people are finding on Obama's secret birth certificate! 🤭 (y)
 
Didn't miss it, suppressed it. Mueller never said Trump was guilty, never said he wasn't. Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report did not make a definitive determination.
  • Collusion: The report found insufficient evidence to conclude that the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government to influence the 2016 election. However, the report did detail that the Trump campaign "expected it would benefit electorally" from Russian hacking efforts and that there were "numerous links" between the campaign and the Russian government.
  • Obstruction of Justice: Mueller investigated multiple instances of potential obstruction of justice by President Trump but ultimately decided not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment on whether a crime was committed.
  • No Exoneration: While the report did not conclude that Trump committed a crime, it also explicitly stated that it "does not exonerate him".
  • Evidence Presented: The report laid out evidence on both sides of the obstruction question and left unresolved the "difficult issues" of law and fact concerning whether the president's actions and intent could be viewed as obstruction.
  • Department of Justice Policy: The Special Counsel's office accepted the Department of Justice policy that a sitting president cannot be indicted.
  • Barr's Conclusion: Attorney General William Barr and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein concluded that the evidence presented in the report was not sufficient to establish that the president committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.
generated by AI
Most of this was because Mueller realized he could not prosecute a sitting president anyway, so why bother with a more detailed investigation. That's not the absence of evidence you think it means.
 
Where are the criminal charges? It's Trump's DoJ. You should demand that your leaders stop whining to the media and bring criminal charges. Put up or shut up.

Otherwise it kinda looks like they're just trying to manipulate you.
Where are the insurrection charges (or at the very least incoting violence charges ) against Trump?
 
The coverup is being uncovered. Much like peeling an onion. The DNI Director Gabbard’s believes that there was a broad effort to coverup the evidence left in the wake from deploying the Russian Investigation hoax.

——————————————-

"There is no rational or logical explanation for why they failed," she said, adding "The only logical conclusion that I can draw in this … is that there was direct intent to cover up the truth about what occurred and who was responsible and the broad network of how this seditious conspiracy was concocted and who exactly was responsible for carrying it out."

“Among other things, Gabbard's team unearthed a Sept. 12, 2016 intelligence community assessment that "foreign adversaries do not have and will probably not obtain the capabilities to successfully execute widespread and undetected cyber attacks" on election systems.”

“At the time, Russia was being accused of setting up troll farms and hacking the DNC email servers (Seth who?).”

“And of course, once legitimized by the Obama administration, a steady stream of leaks suggesting that Russia was behind Trump's 2016 victory started appearing in the Washington Post and other outlets in "sweeping and systemic fashion."

Thus Spake TylerDurden.
Another internet dumpster-dive.
 
Back
Top Bottom