• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

From the "every R accusation is an admission" file we have this

SACRAMENTO, Calif. —
California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Friday signed a law that would give judges a say on whether to list someone as a sex offender for having oral or anal sex with a minor.

The bill would expand the discretion currently granted judges in statutory rape cases and was promoted as bringing fairness under the law to LGBTQ defendants.

 
Dems kept it at a misdemeanor.
Why do you think that's good enough?
Why do you defend California allowing a 32 year old man marrying at 13 year old girl?

Dems kept a parent crossing the border with their child as a misdemeanor because it's ridiculous to assume it must be sex trafficking.

Dawn Tryee is 51. She was married when she was 13, which means the marriage happened in 1987, when a Republican was governor and Republicans controlled the California legislature. Why didn't those Republicans make child marriage illegal?
 
Dems kept a parent crossing the border with their child as a misdemeanor because it's ridiculous to assume it must be sex trafficking.

Dawn Tryee is 51. She was married when she was 13, which means the marriage happened in 1987, when a Republican was governor and Republicans controlled the California legislature. Why didn't those Republicans make child marriage illegal?

Why don't they change the law? Why do they water down the law?
California has a Democratic trifecta and a Democratic triplex. The Democratic Party controls the offices of governor, secretary of state, attorney general, and both chambers of the state legislature.
 
Um no, not in California

Current California law makes it functionally impossible for anyone under 17 to get married because of the requirements to undergo monitoring and counseling before hand.
 
That's a lie, and an intentional, blatant slur.

You know perfectly well this board has a number of members who are - as you choose to put it, "MAGAs" - and you also know perfectly well who they/we are - and knowing this, you willfully and purposely post that BS.

Personally, I'd like an apology - and so would all of "my pedophiles." (For pity freeking sake...)
Trump openly admitted that he likes looking at young teenage girls in their changing rooms. That makes him a paedophile doesn't it, but magas all voted for him. Explain that to us please?
 
Why don't they change the law? Why do they water down the law?
California has a Democratic trifecta and a Democratic triplex. The Democratic Party controls the offices of governor, secretary of state, attorney general, and both chambers of the state legislature.

Why did Republicans allow Dawn Tyree to get married? Let me guess, you just googled "child marriage in California" and used the first story you could find without actually looking up when the marriage occurred, didn't you?
 
child-marriage.gif



 
Why did Republicans allow Dawn Tyree to get married? Let me guess, you just googled "child marriage in California" and used the first story you could find without actually looking up when the marriage occurred, didn't you?
Unicef is attempting to end child marriage in CA now. They used a previous example to show how horrendous it is. Regardless of your claims regarding CA, Child marriages in CA are still going strong. And there is no mandatory felony penalty in CA for having sex with a child.
 
Unicef is attempting to end child marriage in CA now. They used a previous example to show how horrendous it is. Regardless of your claims regarding CA, Child marriages in CA are still going strong. And there is no mandatory felony penalty in CA for having sex with a child.

I’m not letting you walk away from using Dawn Tyree as an example.

Why did Republicans let her get married?

What is your source child marriages in CA are “going strong”?
 
In psychology we call this a "reaction formation."


Is that what they call it?

"From the "every R accusation is an admission" file we have this"​

Reaction formation? I don't think so.
Remember, when you point your finger outward, there's always three pointing back at you.

Think of it, Trump's just getting started fulfilling his promises to his voters. Those afflicted with TDS, have 1402 days of Trump in office to toss more mud and hoping it sticks.
 
Last edited:
Trump openly admitted that he likes looking at young teenage girls in their changing rooms. That makes him a paedophile doesn't it, but magas all voted for him. Explain that to us please?
"It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side."
 
Current California law makes it functionally impossible for anyone under 17 to get married because of the requirements to undergo monitoring and counseling before hand.
Unicef does it think it's working.

California law allows parents to marry off children of any age. More than 8,000 children in California are married each year, giving thousands of get-out-of-jail-free cards to child rapists — since sex with a child under age 18 is a crime in California, unless the perpetrator first marries the child.

 
"It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side."


Do you use your position to stare at teen age girls when their getting dressed?

I mean is that normal in your house?

Because I see it as perverted. Lets remember Trump is a convicted sex offender/rapist!
 
I’m not letting you walk away from using Dawn Tyree as an example.

Why did Republicans let her get married?

What is your source child marriages in CA are “going strong”?
I posted the above several times.
I've proved my point.
The thread is as hypocritical as possible.
Why are you protecting it?
 
Is that what they call it? Reaction formation?

I call the O/P commentary made by you classic projection.
Remember, when you point your finger outward, there's always three pointing back at you.
Think of it, Trump's just getting started fulfilling his promises to his voters. Those afflicted with TDS, have 1402 days of Trump in office to toss more mud and hoping it sticks.
...and aren't we smug.

Of course EVERYTHING can be loaded off on Trump Derangement Syndrome!!!!

I just realized that its self descriptive....that Trumpos know they are being conned.
 
Yeah, just another normal Republican.
"Senator Justin Eichorn was arrested and booked on Tuesday. He believed he was talking to a 17-year-old female, but was communicating instead with detectives from the Bloomington, Minnesota, police department"


That's deranged. Not only being led by his little member but too stupid to know he was hitting on cops!
 
...and aren't we smug.

Of course EVERYTHING can be loaded off on Trump Derangement Syndrome!!!!

I just realized that its self descriptive....that Trumpos know they are being conned.

The irony is simply delicious. A smug Canadian poster whining about our free and fair democratic elections.
 
Another lie. No one's trying to dismantle the Republic
That's a lie, and an intentional, blatant slur.

You know perfectly well this board has a number of members who are - as you choose to put it, "MAGAs" - and you also know perfectly well who they/we are - and knowing this, you willfully and purposely post that BS.

Personally, I'd like an apology - and so would all of "my pedophiles." (For pity freeking sake...)

The cruelty is the point! You don't need an apology from anyone like this.
 
"Senator Justin Eichorn was arrested and booked on Tuesday. He believed he was talking to a 17-year-old female, but was communicating instead with detectives from the Bloomington, Minnesota, police department"


That's deranged. Not only being led by his little member but too stupid to know he was hitting on cops!
And stupid as well. He should have gone to CA. He could have got off with a misdemeanor if they even try him.
 
Is the age of consent in Canada really 16?
 
Do you use your position to stare at teen age girls when their getting dressed?

I mean is that normal in your house?

Because I see it as perverted. Lets remember Trump is a convicted sex offender/rapist!
Nope.

Nope.

That was my point.

You see a little more hot blooded today, everything ok?
 
I posted the above several times.
I've proved my point.
The thread is as hypocritical as possible.
Why are you protecting it?

Why are you dancing away from your own example? Why did republicans allow Dawn Tyree to get married as a child?
 
Back
Top Bottom