The "redefining" of marriage argument is so silly on its face that it almost isn't worth pointing out that people living 150 years ago wouldn't recognize marriage 30 years ago anymore than people living in the 5th century wouldn't recognize marriages in the 19th century. To make it simpler. "Marriage" has been redefined over, and over, and over again due to societal constructs. A good book to read on how marriage has been redefined over and over would be a "A History of the Wife".
If your opinion on the subject is strong enough to kill yourself, you probably are a bigot.
]our marriage is pointless therefore it should be annulled. It's pointless because I say it is. My opinion of your marriage is very important, right?
Interracial couples are demanding a special right to redefine marriage that has stood since the beginning of mankind! Such unions are unnatural! If God intended races to mix, he wouldn't have put them on separate continents! Race mixing is a socialist agenda!*
*actual arguments against interracial marriage
Marriage has always meant man + woman.
Did history stop in 2010?
Just because The Left wants to pretend marriage means something else doesn't make it so
Opposing gay marriage doesn't make someone a bigot
That doesn't answer my question. You said "marriage has always meant man + woman." So what happened to the years 2000-2013? Did they fall into The Great Void or something? Did we all agree to stop recording history at the year 2000?
you forgot the second part "....anymore than opposing civil rights for minorities makes you a bigot".
1.)Gays are not demanding "equal rights"
2.)They are demanding the special right to redefine marriage as it has been known since the beginning of mankind
3.). They are demanding that special right over any other interest group that wants to redefine marriage based upon their sexual behavior.
4.)They are demanding the special right to completely change the oldest tradition and institution in human history.
5.)Opposing that doesn't make someone a bigot.
The fact that you're laughing at this troubled soul who took his own life because he opposed your political opinion on gay marriage speaks volumes. Shame on you.
There is nothing about gay marriage that improves upon marriage
It's pointless and pretend marriage
What point are you trying to make here
You know that gray is spelled with an "a," don't you?
You've even got it wrong in your sig line. Just a friendly heads-up.
1.) false, they are going for equal rights
2.) also false and this has been proven lol
3.) marriage wont be getting redefine as SSM as exist way before we were even born lol what will happen is it will now be LEGALLY protected
4.) another lie that has been proven false, SOrry, you can acknowledge this fact or deny it but the fact remains your statement is 100% false
5.) good thing i didnt say it did, I asked you do define opposing which you totally dodged lol
6.) wrong again i think he is a loon and i still do. I havent stated my political views on SSM, i have stated what it actually is, I do laugh at your lies and ignorance posted here LOL
this time try answering the question and not making stuff up because facts are laugh at you
Just because The Left wants to pretend marriage means something else doesn't make it so
The definitions of words matter.
What is unclear about it? You said "marriage has always been man + woman." Since marriage has been more than that at least since the year 2000, I'm wondering why you decided to eliminate the years 2000-2013 in order to make your statement.
Opposing gay marriage doesn't make you a bigot
Marriage has always meant man + woman. Not man + ? or woman + ?. Gays are not entitled to the special right of redefinng marriage to fit their specific selfish needs, especially over other interest groups who want to change the definition as it's been known since the beginning of mankind.
Gay marriage is pretend marriage. Pointless pretend marriage. It's no more valid than that girl marrying a roller coaster. Opposing it doesn't make you a bigot. Just like opposing that girl marrying a roller coaster doesn't make you a bigot. I understand emotionally you want to lash out at anyone who disagrees with your political opinions as "bigots", but that's not my problem. That's your problem.
Interracial couples weren't trying to redefine marriage from man + woman to man + ? or woman + ?. Are you claiming blacks are ? now? That would make you a bigot.
Comparing gay marriage to black civil rights issues is racist and offensive.
1) False. They are demanding the special right to redefine marriage over any other interest group that wants to change the definition based upon sexual behavior
2) Saying something false and following it with LOL might work in your tiny little world but it doesn't work in real life
3) Yes it will. Has never meant man + ? or woman + ?
4) Not a lie /shrug
5) You don't know what the definition of "opposition" is? LOL
6.)Anyways it's good to see you're no longer laughing and clowning on some guy who killed himself.
7.) For any future replies to the same tired cliche strawmen feel free to reference this post. That goes for everyone. Gay Marriage isn't anymore relevant to society than a woman marrying a roller coaster.
You can keep spitting out the same rants all you like, it doesn't make them more valid. The idea that gay marriage doesn't count is your opinion, not fact. Comparing race rights to gay rights sure seems valid, because you guys are using the exact same arguments. EXACTLY THE SAME. but feel free to throw out the race card some more if it makes you feel better.
Marriage hasn't always been man + woman. Sometimes it was man + many women or man + slave or man + rape victim and then it was man + woman of the same race. Lots of things have been traditional. That doesn't make them right.
If you can't identify any measurable harm caused by legalizing same-sex marriage, on what grounds should the government of the United States ban it?
So a guy offs himself because some gays can get married.
What.
The.
****?
You people are ghouls.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?