BLM shouts "Death to Cops!" Shortly afterwards, cops get assassinated.
Right Wing Radio and TV blasts 24 hour propaganda pushing one party, the GOP, while vilifying the other.
Trump wants to redo libel laws, perhaps because he is sick of being compared to an orangutan.
You know the drill. Everyone has a bitch about something someone said. But, is there a limit to what people say? Is there a such thing as hate speech, especially the kind that needs to be curbed like they do in places like Germany?
Just asking.
BLM shouts "Death to Cops!" Shortly afterwards, cops get assassinated.
Right Wing Radio and TV blasts 24 hour propaganda pushing one party, the GOP, while vilifying the other.
Trump wants to redo libel laws, perhaps because he is sick of being compared to an orangutan.
You know the drill. Everyone has a bitch about something someone said. But, is there a limit to what people say? Is there a such thing as hate speech, especially the kind that needs to be curbed like they do in places like Germany?
Just asking.
BLM shouts "Death to Cops!" Shortly afterwards, cops get assassinated.
Right Wing Radio and TV blasts 24 hour propaganda pushing one party, the GOP, while vilifying the other.
Trump wants to redo libel laws, perhaps because he is sick of being compared to an orangutan.
You know the drill. Everyone has a bitch about something someone said. But, is there a limit to what people say? Is there a such thing as hate speech, especially the kind that needs to be curbed like they do in places like Germany?
Just asking.
BLM shouts "Death to Cops!" Shortly afterwards, cops get assassinated.
Right Wing Radio and TV blasts 24 hour propaganda pushing one party, the GOP, while vilifying the other.
Trump wants to redo libel laws, perhaps because he is sick of being compared to an orangutan.
You know the drill. Everyone has a bitch about something someone said. But, is there a limit to what people say? Is there a such thing as hate speech, especially the kind that needs to be curbed like they do in places like Germany?
Just asking.
BLM shouts "Death to Cops!" Shortly afterwards, cops get assassinated.
Right Wing Radio and TV blasts 24 hour propaganda pushing one party, the GOP, while vilifying the other.
Trump wants to redo libel laws, perhaps because he is sick of being compared to an orangutan.
You know the drill. Everyone has a bitch about something someone said. But, is there a limit to what people say? Is there a such thing as hate speech, especially the kind that needs to be curbed like they do in places like Germany?
Just asking.
BLM shouts "Death to Cops!" Shortly afterwards, cops get assassinated.
BLM shouts "Death to Cops!" Shortly afterwards, cops get assassinated.
Right Wing Radio and TV blasts 24 hour propaganda pushing one party, the GOP, while vilifying the other.
Trump wants to redo libel laws, perhaps because he is sick of being compared to an orangutan.
You know the drill. Everyone has a bitch about something someone said. But, is there a limit to what people say? Is there a such thing as hate speech, especially the kind that needs to be curbed like they do in places like Germany?
Just asking.
And Snopes thoroughly debunked that video.
Of course, since Snopes is a fact-checking site, they're automatically a left-wing shill, for we all know that reality has a liberal bias and that facts can only be considered factual if they support the conservative fantasy world.
The only reason anyone wants to censor speech is because they're afraid what's being said will catch on.
Where did BLM say, "death to cops"? Just askin'....
And Snopes thoroughly debunked that video.
Of course, since Snopes is a fact-checking site, they're automatically a left-wing shill, for we all know that reality has a liberal bias and that facts can only be considered factual if they support the conservative fantasy world.
The original video of New York protesters referenced at the beginning of this article was uploaded on 13 December 2014 by Manhattan resident Tom Dilello, who maintained that he shot and uploaded the clip in the span of six minutes, leaving no time for him to edit the raw footage of the "dead cops" chant.
It is the other way around. You think an tolerant culture can exist with an intolerant culture. That disqualifies your observation.
Freedom of speech does not need to be rethought. The First Amendment is pretty specific.
Political Correctness needs to be thrown out the window. People need to develop some tough skin. The idea of "micro aggressions" or however they put it on today's colleges is total bull****.
Not true. The liberals want to censor speech that might hurt their chances of taking another election. The liberals who want to prosecute global warming skeptics are concerned about losing their grants to increase the hysteria. The racist want to make dog whistles and code words illegal. Wolf whistles are already illegal. And some want anything that is said that offends them to be illegal.
Nah. Freedom of Speech doesn't need rethinking.
Okay... where to start... Snopes didn't say it didn't happen, they debunked a claim that this occurred and then three days later three cops in Baton Rouge were killed. The video was taken and posted to YouTube in 2014. If you would have taken time to look at the actual source of the video I posted you would have seen it was the one that Snopes said was the REAL VIDEO.
So, no... you blew this one.
From your own linked Snopes story:
Dude, look at the guys name that's on the YouTube account of the video I gave you - hint, its Tom Dilello.
NYC. But, of course, they are denying it was them.
The Monsters Who Screamed for Dead Cops - The Daily Beast
You only read as far as you wanted to read, huh? If you'd read to the conclusion, you'd have seen the following:
The clip in question involving chants about "dead cops" was shot in New York City in December 2014, but contemporaneous reporting widely and incorrectly identified its source as Black Lives Matter and Millions March demonstrations taking place in different parts of the city at different times. After shootings claimed the lives of police officers in Dallas and Baton Rouge in July 2016, the clip resurfaced and was often mislabeled as occurring in one of those locations.
It wasn't BLM, it wasn't "Million Man March" - it was a bunch of pissed-off people in an apparently spontaneous protest that was unaffiliated with any known group. But of course y'all can't stop yourselves from blaming BLM.
There are already laws against libel, slander, and direct threats. What exactly needs to be changed?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?