• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Freedom of Information Act rules changes?

The Mark

Sporadic insanity normal.
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
31,589
Reaction score
9,662
Location
Pennsylvania
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive

Helix

Administrator
Moderator
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 1, 2011
Messages
84,181
Reaction score
75,073
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
well, there's a shock.
 

Rogue Valley

Putin = War Criminal
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
83,104
Reaction score
68,060
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Short story ..... the Trump administration detests transparency.
 

DaveFagan

Iconoclast
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 20, 2011
Messages
10,090
Reaction score
5,056
Location
wny
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
Gov't secrecy is never a good thing.
/
 

Captain Adverse

Classical Liberal Sage
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
18,974
Reaction score
25,127
Location
Mid-West USA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
This appears to be one of the issues they refer to:

‘The subject of the request must concern discrete, identifiable agency activities, operations, or programs with a connection that is direct and clear, not remote or attenuated.’’
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2018-12-28/pdf/2018-27561.pdf

That is a change to Section 2.48(a).

Also to Section 2.5(d):

You must describe the records you seek sufficiently to enable a professional employee familiar with the subject to locate the documents with a reasonable effort. Extremely broad or vague requests or requests requiring research do not satisfy this requirement. The bureau will not honor a request that requires an unreasonably burdensome search or requires the bureau to locate, review, redact, or arrange for inspection of a vast quantity of material.
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2018-12-28/pdf/2018-27561.pdf

Those do seriously impede requests since one does not necessarily know what they might find when making the request, they are seeking information they think might exist if properly researched.

The monthly limit problem is in Section 2.14.:

‘‘The bureau may impose a monthly limit for processing records in response to your request in order to treat FOIA requesters equitably by responding to a greater number of FOIA requests each month.
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2018-12-28/pdf/2018-27561.pdf

As per the article I can understand trying to impose a monthly limit, there are more and more requests and staff is limited per budget constraints.

There may be a problem with the major increase in requests, and the time constraints to respond. What to do about it absent these "changes?"

Should Congress vote to increase the budget for staffing and support?
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom