• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

"Free" preventive annual exams, but no coverage for treatment if they find cancer?

Re: "Free" preventive annual exams, but no coverage for treatment if they find cancer

I think its rational to show the inconsistencies of this law.
I think it's rational to show the inconsistencies of conservatives. They don't want the government to mandate coverage, except when they do.
 
Re: "Free" preventive annual exams, but no coverage for treatment if they find cancer

I think it's rational to show the inconsistencies of conservatives. They don't want the government to mandate coverage, except when they do.

Seems like a bit of distraction from the mandated and flawed "aca", though I think.
 
Back
Top Bottom