earthworm
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2005
- Messages
- 5,728
- Reaction score
- 904
- Location
- Goldsboro,PA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
IMO, the French are doing the right thing.
One reason is to uphold French nationalism and their culture.
The Arabs are free to go home.
They are also closer than we are to the Islamic terrorism, too much can be hidden under these vestments/attire..
Anyway, its their nation, their laws..
This is probably upsetting to the Islamics and their supporters....
Too bad:mrgreen:
I seem to remember that in Turkey it is against the law to wear any form of religious garb in public unless you are going to a Mosque, Church, ect from your home and then back to your home, does that still apply and if it does its a good idea
Which law are you talking about worm, the Turkish law that was established by Atatürk, or the law that some are attempting to bring in in France?And Turkey wishes to join the civilized world ?
This is a stupid law, one very difficult and costly to enforce..
Ours is not the only nation with intellectually challenged lawmakers.
And Turkey wishes to join the civilized world ?
This is a stupid law, one very difficult and costly to enforce..
Ours is not the only nation with intellectually challenged lawmakers.
The Burqa?Well actually its not illegal to wear headscarfs in public.
Its illegal to wear them in government run institutions such as the police force, educational academies, etc. In public and on the street is perfectly acceptable, though they are not encouraged to do so.
The Burqa?
It does get hotYes, and the headscarf. You wont find anybody wearing Burqa's anyway, at least not Turks, from what i remember Turkey is mainly Sunni.
It does get hot
Oh, for FFS! :roll:
Isn't it enough that they've already banned religious attire in government buildings, now they want to ban it in the streets as well?
Seriously, though. I think it's a really bad idea for a government to tell people how they're allowed to dress. There is also the unintended likely consequence of such a ban: these women will never set foot outside their homes again.
Also, LOL @ the picture's caption placing Marseille in central France. :rofl
There is a high level of anti-Muslim sentiment in France right now. France is xenophobic in general, but when it comes to Middle Easterners it's in a league of its own. This should not surprise observers, although it does set a dangerous precedent for what the government there has the ability to tell people to do.
Thats what I implied, keep upGood thing they dont wear Burqa's then :lol:
Nah....those are worn out of habit.While there at it they can Ban those silly Nuns Garments (except in private party's):3oops:
There is a case for standing up for the vulnerable, silent majority of oppressed Muslim women. Its great us 'Westerners' suggesting they should stand up for themselves etc, but generations of oppression can, and do impact on ones ability to rebel. I say give them a helping hand and ban the draconian attire.
Paul
True. But what about freedom of religion? Isn't that important too?
Freedom of religion is important, but not when it impacts "secularist" society?Freedom of religion is very important, but i feel if the burqa and Hi jab impact on secularist society it no longer becomes non intrusive.
Paul
Go commandoTrue. But what about freedom of religion? Isn't that important too?
Nah....those are worn out of habit.
Freedom of religion is very important, but i feel if the burqa and Hi jab impact on secularist society it no longer becomes non intrusive.
Paul
Personally, I dislike the garment in question, as it IMO is a symbol of the oppression of women. Used as a tool of controll, etc. However, if the female in question believes that it is necessary, that's up to them.
From another angle, I can see banning a garment of this type for security reasons and the like, but I would much rather a more blanket ban. For example, "no clothing items in security areas which partially or in full conceal the wearers identity". Of course, they could just ask the person to remove the item to confirm their identity, I suppose.
No offense, but justice does not play off of your personal likes/dislikes (in fact it's purpose is to ignore those completely).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?