Fox's Napolitano to Trump: First Amendment 'does not regulate Twitter' | TheHill
Fox News legal analyst Andrew Napolitano said Wednesday that President Trump faces an uphill battle with his threat to regulate social media platforms like Twitter.
“The First Amendment, which guarantees the freedom of speech and of the press since it only regulates the government, does not regulate Twitter," the former New Jersey Superior Court judge said on "America's Newsroom."
"Twitter can take down, modify or correct any user it wants, including the president of the United States," Napolitano added.
================================================================
Trump should read the Constitution.
How in the ever loving **** does such obvious facts need to be told to Republicans and the president?
How in the ever loving **** does such obvious facts need to be told to Republicans and the president?
Fox's Napolitano to Trump: First Amendment 'does not regulate Twitter' | TheHill
Fox News legal analyst Andrew Napolitano said Wednesday that President Trump faces an uphill battle with his threat to regulate social media platforms like Twitter.
“The First Amendment, which guarantees the freedom of speech and of the press since it only regulates the government, does not regulate Twitter," the former New Jersey Superior Court judge said on "America's Newsroom."
"Twitter can take down, modify or correct any user it wants, including the president of the United States," Napolitano added.
================================================================
Trump should read the Constitution.
Thirty years of intensive conditioning.
Fox's Napolitano to Trump: First Amendment 'does not regulate Twitter' | TheHill
Fox News legal analyst Andrew Napolitano said Wednesday that President Trump faces an uphill battle with his threat to regulate social media platforms like Twitter.
“The First Amendment, which guarantees the freedom of speech and of the press since it only regulates the government, does not regulate Twitter," the former New Jersey Superior Court judge said on "America's Newsroom."
"Twitter can take down, modify or correct any user it wants, including the president of the United States," Napolitano added.
================================================================
Trump should read the Constitution.
Because they don't care about law or the Constitution. At least as to how it hinders them in their political aspirations & expediency.How in the ever loving **** does such obvious facts need to be told to Republicans and the president?
Because they don't care about law or the Constitution. At least as to how it hinders them in their political aspirations & expediency.
I hate to flame the fire, but you've got to admit the guy played the game skillfully for what he wanted to do.He has absolute authority, is immune from prosecution, and can adjourn Congress at his leisure, what does the Constitution stand to that?
This is Our Dear Leader.
I hate to flame the fire, but you've got to admit the guy played the game skillfully for what he wanted to do.
I don't know if he'll prevail (in Nov.), but if he does he will have done nothing anyone alive ever thought possible. It's not a good thing. But it's a unique thing. On second thought maybe it's not as much skill, as wanton disregard no other recent White House occupant had contemplated.
Yep. I've been claiming that for a long time.Trump has no respect for the Republic or the office of President. The best thing he can do is to create drama, to divide, to fan the flames of hatred. He is the Reality-TV President and he's turning us into the Reality-TV Nation. That's it.
Trump ain't winning in November - he's toast.I hate to flame the fire, but you've got to admit the guy played the game skillfully for what he wanted to do.
I don't know if he'll prevail (in Nov.), but if he does he will have done nothing anyone alive ever thought possible. It's not a good thing. But it's a unique thing. On second thought maybe it's not as much skill, as wanton disregard no other recent White House occupant had contemplated.
I hate to flame the fire, but you've got to admit the guy played the game skillfully for what he wanted to do.
I don't know if he'll prevail (in Nov.), but if he does he will have done nothing anyone alive ever thought possible. It's not a good thing. But it's a unique thing. On second thought maybe it's not as much skill, as wanton disregard no other recent White House occupant had contemplated.
We haven't spoke in awhile, but up until very recently I felt Trump was favored. Now I'm giving it 50-50, with perhaps just a tiny sliver of default to Trump.Trump ain't winning in November - he's toast.
I've held off saying it and polls will tighten and widen several times before election day, but his handling of the pandemic has been a PR disaster. The man has put on full display that he is a twisted, demented sociopath in a horrific psychological collapse, and there's no commercial that's going to undue that damage.
He's going to lose and then he's going to meltdown and fight to not leave.
I hate to flame the fire, but you've got to admit the guy played the game skillfully for what he wanted to do.
I don't know if he'll prevail (in Nov.), but if he does he will have done nothing anyone alive ever thought possible. It's not a good thing. But it's a unique thing. On second thought maybe it's not as much skill, as wanton disregard no other recent White House occupant had contemplated.
<snip>Trump should read the Constitution.
Trump has no respect for the Republic or the office of President. The best thing he can do is to create drama, to divide, to fan the flames of hatred. He is the Reality-TV President and he's turning us into the Reality-TV Nation. That's it.
Fox's Napolitano to Trump: First Amendment 'does not regulate Twitter' | TheHill
Fox News legal analyst Andrew Napolitano said Wednesday that President Trump faces an uphill battle with his threat to regulate social media platforms like Twitter.
“The First Amendment, which guarantees the freedom of speech and of the press since it only regulates the government, does not regulate Twitter," the former New Jersey Superior Court judge said on "America's Newsroom."
"Twitter can take down, modify or correct any user it wants, including the president of the United States," Napolitano added.
================================================================
Trump should read the Constitution.
I surprised Twitter did not shut Trump down years ago for ToS violations. Then again, they are attention whores like most of America. How could they resist all the free product promotion Trump gives them? Everyone knows what Twitter is now; less so five years ago.
Trump ain't winning in November - he's toast.
I've held off saying it and polls will tighten and widen several times before election day, but his handling of the pandemic has been a PR disaster. The man has put on full display that he is a twisted, demented sociopath in a horrific psychological collapse, and there's no commercial that's going to undue that damage.
He's going to lose and then he's going to meltdown and fight to not leave.
Democrats are treating Biden like Republicans treat Trump. His gaffes, mistakes, and moments where he's in the wrong simply don't matter to them. It's not changing anything when he makes offensive remarks about the black vote, or gets caught lying about something.We haven't spoke in awhile, but up until very recently I felt Trump was favored. Now I'm giving it 50-50, with perhaps just a tiny sliver of default to Trump.
Why?
Because by the numbers Biden looks reasonably good, but definitely not decisive where it counts in the battlegrounds. However, my caution & pessimism comes from Biden's unknown abilities in the debates. He could bomb the debates. In fact, I'm almost counting on him having several bad moments.
And any one bad debate moment, if serious enough and it takes-off and resonates, could tip the scale. So for that reason, I believe trump is still very much alive, even if flailing around a bit currently.
I think 2016 PTSD largely prevents that.The only thing that worries me about this kind of thinking is that it may give D's a false sense of the inevitable.
I mean, I know you'll vote, but maybe others won't, if they think he's going to lose bigly.
The only thing that worries me about this kind of thinking is that it may give D's a false sense of the inevitable.
I mean, I know you'll vote, but maybe others won't, if they think he's going to lose bigly.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?