Handcuff then together, then stand then in a circle around governmental buildings as a first line of parking speed bump defensive measures.Should Fox News and other right wing News sites be shut down for continuing to perpetuate the lies that have resulted in an American Insurection?
More attacks are planned. How will it end.
No, I am kind of a big fan of the first amendment (and the principal of free speech)Should Fox News and other right wing News sites be shut down for continuing to perpetuate the lies that have resulted in an American Insurection?
More attacks are planned. How will it end.
Should Fox News and other right wing News sites be shut down for continuing to perpetuate the lies that have resulted in an American Insurection?
More attacks are planned. How will it end.
2012 Study: They found that someone who watched only Fox News would be expected to answer 1.04 domestic questions correctly compared to 1.22 for those who watched no news at all.
2015 Study: A new study by Bruce Bartlett, a conservative economist, top official in the H.W. Bush administration and domestic policy adviser to Ronald Reagan, concluded that Fox News viewers tend to be less informed and engage in "self-brainwashing."
2016 Study: William Poundstone has done similar surveys, both of current events and with more general knowledge. "In my research too, Fox News viewers scored the lowest of over 30 popular news sources (though Fox viewers did at least score better than those saying they didn't follow the news)."
2017 Study: Trump has received unsparing coverage for most weeks of his presidency, without a single major topic where Trump’s coverage, on balance, was more positive than negative, setting a new standard for unfavorable press coverage of a president. Fox was the only news outlet in the study that came close to giving Trump positive coverage overall, however, there was variation in the tone of Fox’s coverage depending on the topic. When Trump’s category-by-category coverage was examined for each of the seven U.S. news outlets in our study, a consistent pattern emerged. The sources of Trump’s most and least negative coverage were similar for every outlet, except for Fox News.
2019 Study: Fox News likes to tout the “hard news” side of its operation, setting up a false distinction between its right-wing prime-time hosts and the members of its news team as a defense against those who flag the propaganda, lies, conspiracy theories, and bigotry that pervade the network. But a Media Matters investigation found that the “news side” isn't as inoculated as the network claims. We looked at Fox News and Fox Business programming for the first four months of 2019, and we documented examples of the “news” division spreading misinformation on air every single day between January 1 and April 30.
Other.Should Fox News and other right wing News sites be shut down for continuing to perpetuate the lies that have resulted in an American Insurection?
More attacks are planned. How will it end.
Should Fox News and other right wing News sites be shut down for continuing to perpetuate the lies that have resulted in an American Insurection?
More attacks are planned. How will it end.
All news sources must be legally allowed to quote the President.
They should be legally allowed to label the quotes as lies.I agree.
The problem is the President if he is spewing lies.
First Amendment to the US Constitution. Saying things you don’t agree with is a Constitutional right. Kinda like what you’re doing right here on DP.Should Fox News and other right wing News sites be shut down for continuing to perpetuate the lies that have resulted in an American Insurection?
More attacks are planned. How will it end.
You mean like CNN, MSNBC, NYT, and WaPoo?I voted no, but it wasn't easy. Wish I knew what the answer is. When people are allowed to spout lie after lie because that is what their fans want to hear, it's dangerous.
Everybody has an opinion, but to just flat out lie all the time eventually leads to where we are today.
Actually, no.You mean like CNN, MSNBC, NYT, and WaPoo?
Well done. You’re get an extra cookie when your gurus serve you the Kool Aid tonight.Actually, no.
I agree.
The problem is the President if he is spewing lies.
That is not true. There is no Constitutional right to say things others don't agree with. The only Constitutional right that applies to speech is that the government has no right to limit your speech. Corporations, private institutions and employers have every righr to limit speech as it relates to their juristiction.First Amendment to the US Constitution. Saying things you don’t agree with is a Constitutional right
icNo, as hard as that is to say , but their advertisers need to do the right thing and pull their dollars and responsible, thinking conservatives with a voice need to denounce and repudiate their lies.
It was interesting to hear Toomey say that not one single Senator told him that they believed the election was stolen, not one! Rather they told him that if they didn' t say they thought there was fraud they would " look" bad . He needs to go on Fox and say that!
If a news station was coming up with lies all on its own, what would that be? A tabloid; harmless.
Why do you say it is harmless?
It can be harmless or it can be of great harm.
Sorry, no. Legal action to silence Fox would definitely be a constitutional violation. Corporations, etc. can limit speech within their jurisdions - within limitations.That is not true. There is no Constitutional right to say things others don't agree with. The only Constitutional right that applies to speech is that the government has no right to limit your speech. Corporations, private institutions and employers have every righr to limit speech as it relates to their juristiction.