• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

(Fox Business) Pink Floyd sells recorded music catalog for $400M (1 Viewer)

Chomsky

Social Democrat
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 28, 2015
Messages
98,477
Reaction score
87,431
Location
Third Coast
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
--
British rock band Pink Floyd has reportedly sold its recorded music catalog, along with its name and likeness rights, to Sony Music for $400 million.
Sources told Variety the legendary rock band had come to an agreement after decades of fighting among band members. According to the outlet, this deal only includes recorded music rights, not songwriting.
pink-floyd.jpg

--
The band members of Pink Floyd not only sold their Music Rights to Sony Corp, but also their Likeness and Name!

To my thinking, they gave away a lot for $400M USD. The bandmembers did keep their songwriting credits, though.

Time moves on. I remember when Mick Jagger insisted they would never allow the commercial use of their recordings. Not only did the Stones soon renege on that, they even played the Super Bowl!
--

So, did these groups grow-up?

Or, did they sell-out?

You tell me!
 
The answers you seek can be found in this song:


 
--


pink-floyd.jpg

--
The band members of Pink Floyd not only sold their Music Rights to Sony Corp, but also their Likeness and Name!

To my thinking, they gave away a lot for $400M USD. The bandmembers did keep their songwriting credits, though.

Time moves on. I remember when Mick Jagger insisted they would never allow the commercial use of their recordings. Not only did the Stones soon renege on that, they even played the Super Bowl!
--

So, did these groups grow-up?

Or, did they sell-out?

You tell me!
Pink Floyd are what, in their 80's? Why not cash in? You can't take it with you.

Personally I wouldn't give them twelve cents for their catalog. In fact, I think they owe me for The Wall.
 
--


pink-floyd.jpg

--
The band members of Pink Floyd not only sold their Music Rights to Sony Corp, but also their Likeness and Name!

To my thinking, they gave away a lot for $400M USD. The bandmembers did keep their songwriting credits, though.

Time moves on. I remember when Mick Jagger insisted they would never allow the commercial use of their recordings. Not only did the Stones soon renege on that, they even played the Super Bowl!
--

So, did these groups grow-up?

Or, did they sell-out?

You tell me!

I would hope they grew up. Maybe they decided to take the money and run, decided to get their affairs settled for their families' benefit. Not that they could run anymore but you know what I mean. ;)
 
Pink Floyd are what, in their 80's? Why not cash in? You can't take it with you.

Personally I wouldn't give them twelve cents for their catalog. In fact, I think they owe me for The Wall.

I agree with The Wall.

But . . . Dark Side Of The Moon? It's a masterpiece!
 
That was a great album!

Meddle / Dark Side of the Moon / Wish You Were Here

The holy trinity of Floyd!

Special mention: Delicate Sound Of Thunder

I would put The Wall in there instead of Meddle. But otherwise, yeah.
 
Dark Side Of The Moon is the best selling rock-oriented album of all time.

PF has an extensive music catalogue that will probably increase in value over time.

I think it's a good investment for Sony Music.
 
I would hope they grew up. Maybe they decided to take the money and run, decided to get their affairs settled for their families' benefit. Not that they could run anymore but you know what I mean. ;)

Haha!

Yeah, we had a lot of stupid convictions when we were young. But I'd like to think we also had some good ones. The most important thing I think, is we indeed had convictions! We've all got to believe in something, right?

One of the best lines on the sixties I ever heard, was from David Crosby, just after he got out of jail & drug rehab in the eighties:

"Peace, Love, Dope. Well, we got two out of three right!"

I very much miss David Crosby . . .
 
I would put The Wall in there instead of Meddle. But otherwise, yeah.

Then I suppose we could throw Animals in the mix, if we're keeping The Wall?

The reason I put Meddle in there, besides being a great album, is Pink Floyd was still in their (IMO) extremely creative stage - despite reaching commercial success.

Meddle is, in my mind, that transition to commercial success while retaining their early creativity & artistry. That creativity & artistry seemed to wain with Animals, and they seemed to get somewhat formulaic - continuing in that vein. All in my opinion, of course.
 
Last edited:
Dark Side Of The Moon is the best selling rock-oriented album of all time.

PF has an extensive music catalogue that will probably increase in value over time.

I think it's a good investment for Sony Music.

Exactly. I think The Floyd may have sold themselves a bit short.
 
Then I suppose we could throw Animals in the mix, if we're keeping The Wall?

The reason I put meddle in there, besides being a great album, is Pink Floyd was still in their (IMO) extremely creative stage - despite reaching commercial success.

Meddle is, in my mind, that transition to commercial success while retaining their early creativity & artistry. That creativity & artistry seemed to wain with Animals, and they seemed to get somewhat formulaic. All in my opinion, of course.

It is their Rubber Soul?
 
"Careful with That Axe, Eugene"
 
--


pink-floyd.jpg

--
The band members of Pink Floyd not only sold their Music Rights to Sony Corp, but also their Likeness and Name!

To my thinking, they gave away a lot for $400M USD. The bandmembers did keep their songwriting credits, though.

Time moves on. I remember when Mick Jagger insisted they would never allow the commercial use of their recordings. Not only did the Stones soon renege on that, they even played the Super Bowl!
Thanks for the update. One of my absolute favorite groups of all time. Kinda thought this would happen eventually.
So, did these groups grow-up?

Or, did they sell-out?

You tell me!
Not a sell-out whatsoever.

The art is, what the art is. True art is timeless. If more people like it, including advertisers, so what?

This kind of money might leave someone at a "loss for words"...(one of my favorites from the Gilmour years a beatiful poem)

 
Then I suppose we could throw Animals in the mix, if we're keeping The Wall?

The reason I put Meddle in there, besides being a great album, is Pink Floyd was still in their (IMO) extremely creative stage - despite reaching commercial success.

Meddle is, in my mind, that transition to commercial success while retaining their early creativity & artistry. That creativity & artistry seemed to wain with Animals, and they seemed to get somewhat formulaic - continuing in that vein. All in my opinion, of course.

I dunno. Pigs is one of my favorite Pink Floyd songs. Roger Waters is a douche, but he is a songwriting machine. Hell of a songwriter.
 
No, I can’t even compare the Ramones to Floyd.

Good point. Pink Floyd was a phenomenal band, but The Ramones invented a genre.
 
Thanks for the update. One of my absolute favorite groups of all time. Kinda thought this would happen eventually.

Not a sell-out whatsoever.
The art is, what the art is. True art is timeless.
If more people like it, including advertisers, so what?

This kind of money might leave someone at a "loss for words"...(one of my favorites from the Gilmour years a beatiful poem)



Alight, well said. (y)

Yes, art for art's sake!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom