• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

"Four San Francisco protesters hit by car in ‘possible intentional act’..."

EnchantedMuggle said:
Okay, so what you're saying is, this man had two choices: drive diectly into a group of people at an accellerated speed, or turn around.

What to do, what to do...

This man drove directly INTO a group of people. It is amazing to watch the pretzel logic around here trying to justify it.
Click to expand...
I am not justifying why it happened, he should have turned around. I am saying there have been multiple incidents where cars have been smashed up when they tried to go past and stopped.
 
OpportunityCost said:
First off, you are entirely off topic. Secondly thats a stupid reply to my comment. Third, I am not making that argument so, wtf?
Click to expand...
No I'm not "entirely off topic." I said this attack, like the one in Utah, would be followed by misinformation and victim-blaming. So far, that's proving to be the case in Minnesota as well.
 
uptower said:
No I'm not "entirely off topic." I said this attack, like the one in Utah, would be followed by misinformation and victim-blaming. So far, that's proving to be the case in Minnesota as well.
Click to expand...
I know, you guys keep claiming I said things I didn't. Its maddening.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom