We're going to investigate for as long as it takes because a foreign government - one which we generally do not share in values and vision for the world - successfully installed their preferred body in the White House. Russia may hate HRC, but that doesn't explain why they chose to help Trump against Rubio in the Republican primary. In terms of collusion, I think the fact that Trump's errand boy Flynn was on the horn with the Russian ambassador making commitments to reconsider sanctions while they were working behind the scenes to benefit Trump's campaign is telling. It's also telling that nearly everyone involved in the Trump campaign who had contact with the Russians was compelled to lie about that fact and deny it. Not all of the details are public, but team Trump did a spectacular job of giving the appearance of collusion.
Again.... So what if his Son in law had a private meeting...WAS it ILLEGAL? Do we have proof.... People want to FIND something Illegal, IS there PROOF if there is no proof then why keep trying to stir the pot?
Trump being surrounded.. Sure again... lets say it, Guilty by association....I swear our nation of laws state, "Innocent until proven Guilty" While we know this is not true....This has been going on for MONTHS...and NOT even ONE indication of illegal or criminal act....this has got to stop some time. I mean are we going to investigate for 8 years and find nothing? Seriously.
Lastly. Lets take your point about Russia.... Sure... Russia wanted Trump in there.... was that a benefit to Trump sure... does That mean just because Russia wanted Him in there... He was part of a conspiracy to commit electoral crimes? LOL
Its like American Idol.... they have a favorite contestant.... some "extremist" floods the voting system to help their favorite contestant win. Because they LOVE them to death.... Is the Contestant Guilty of collusion? More so the "Extremist" is "im your number 1 fan" and follows the contestant around, tries to talk to the contestant, goes to their home... stalkerish.... Of course the contestant may have contact with the extremist....
But again is the contestant, committing a crime??? this is a serious example...
Russia Hated HRC... period, and likely would do whatever they could so she could not get elected.... Does that automatically mean TRUMP was guilty of something.... Russia, could do whatever they want and we can see how Putin likes to do that.... they dont need Trump telling them what to do......
Again... I dont know.. Maybe he is guilty, but at least SHOW ME SOMETHING!!!
We're going to investigate for as long as it takes because a foreign government - one which we generally do not share in values and vision for the world - successfully installed their preferred body in the White House. Russia may hate HRC, but that doesn't explain why they chose to help Trump against Rubio in the Republican primary. In terms of collusion, I think the fact that Trump's errand boy Flynn was on the horn with the Russian ambassador making commitments to reconsider sanctions while they were working behind the scenes to benefit Trump's campaign is telling. It's also telling that nearly everyone involved in the Trump campaign who had contact with the Russians was compelled to lie about that fact and deny it. Not all of the details are public, but team Trump did a spectacular job of giving the appearance of collusion.
The surveillance was legal and Trump was incidentally surveilled, which means that he, perhaps unwittingly, involved himself in something nefarious that was already being investigated.
Or the surveilance, unmaskings and leaks were Politically motivated
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor
It's not true just because it sorta makes sense to you. So again, what did Trump involve himself in when he walked into the existing surveillance? Aren't you curious?
Lol !! Dont you think that would have been leaked ?
Yups right there with you, they were survielled, legally I am assuming. My question is Why?
Again assuming it was legal
Now its not related to Russia, per her statement, but that is conflicting as 2 interviews go back and forth along with the name dropping of Flynn a couple of times by the interviewer and Susan rice.
So really WHAT the hell is going on? Has to do with Trump or Not. Has to do with Russia or NOT.
If not with Russia, then what, What was so important to surveillance Trump and his people, that it was so important to obtain FISA request and not implicate him to remove himself from the Presidential Candidacy and more so current potential impeachment, I mean its gotta be serious enough if we have to monitor, His people through legal FISA request right?
Something just doesnt add up.....
I wish you were around when the people who are now proclaiming "nothing to see here" about Trump were screaming about Obama knowing Rezko and Ayers. Guilt by association comes from both sides. It's all partisan hackery. It wasn't a crime for Obama to buy land from Rezko, but it didn't stop everyone from assuming Obama was guilty of....something. And when Bush was President (and after he left), it was all about the crimes he and Dick Cheney committed, and how guilty they were.
By the way, yes, apparently we can drag out investigations endlessly in the hopes that something turns up. Remember the Benghazi investigations? Nothing turned up there either, and there was also no evidence that she actually did something illegal, but it didn't stop the party I support from continuing, and continuing, and keeping at it, and it didn't stop Trump and his loyal fan base from following the chants of the now disgraced Michael Flynn of "Lock her up!".
Well, bama didnt catch the same heat trump is catching especially with respect to the media..... Same with Bush....not the same media hysteria, We went to War, invaded a country on unknown pretense, directed by the same intelligence, that has said leaks, surveillance, and Egypt protest. Who we are to believe.
Remember the Benghazi investigation.... yes. It was drawn out, But the difference is, lives were lost, With that, dereliction of duty was at question (multiple request for improved security which went on deaf ears). And then the skeletons of the private email server which a person within the political realm of 40+ years, (that she boast about) Should have known better (especially in relation to secret level or higher conversations).... an Airman in the Air force out of Boot with security clearance., knows not to do this....and would have been subject to immediate UCMJ actions right off the bat. It took a congressional heart and lying under oath to get it out and NOTHING slap on the wrist?....
There has been NO direct case held against Trump, nothing that says he committed a crime, Other than collusion, Collusion of WHAT, what did he do?
Flynn, Had out side dealings, He lied to Pence, WHAT criminal act did he commit... he lied to Pence. Ok... is the criminal, is that national security?
What did all these people that are connected to the Russians, do that is considered a crime? that is what I want to know.
What on Earth are you asking me all of this for? I've said many times that I have no evidence of anything, and neither do you.
If you want to victimize Trump with the old "the media is mean to him", leave me out of it. That's partisan hackery. The media was no friend to Bush either, and it's dishonest to imply that it was.
No lives were lost at Watergate, either. I guess by your standards that should have just been swept under the rug.
The Daily Caller?!:lol:
I notice all the GOP hack sites are running with several stories about Rice today...
I wonder what they are trying to provide deflection from the Trump Admin for...
This Trump and Russia thing is community organizer level BS, and the illegality of the Obama staff is what the real scandal is.
This Trump and Russia thing is community organizer level BS, and the illegality of the Obama staff is what the real scandal is.
Of course, this is only because Republicans fear black women.
Professor: Criticism Of Susan Rice Is Actually Racist | The Daily Caller
The story is fake news. Plus, it's from a partisan website, a source of fake news.
There was no spreadsheet. No illegal activity. Rice was NSA head, so she was given approval to see names, and they were not given to anyone else.
This is a diversionary tactic. There is a criminal investigation moving along of Trump and associates. The AG has already lied under oath. The SECURITY advisor Flynn lied and filed false forms, all related to Russia.
The Trump administration is crumbling. They are relentless is trying various diversionary tactics to give his supporters something to cling to.
No, she was a White House staffer, and the white house doesn't investigate.
WikipediaThe Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs (APNSA), commonly referred to as the National Security Advisor or at times informally termed the NSC advisor,[1][2] is a senior aide in the Executive Office of the President, based at the West Wing of the White House, who serves as the chief in-house advisor to the President of the United States on national security issues.
The story is fake news. Plus, it's from a partisan website, a source of fake news.
There was no spreadsheet. No illegal activity. Rice was NSA head, so she was given approval to see names, and they were not given to anyone else.
This is a diversionary tactic. There is a criminal investigation moving along of Trump and associates. The AG has already lied under oath. The SECURITY advisor Flynn lied and filed false forms, all related to Russia.
The Trump administration is crumbling. They are relentless is trying various diversionary tactics to give his supporters something to cling to.
This Trump and Russia thing is community organizer level BS, and the illegality of the Obama staff is what the real scandal is.
Articles tagged: Daily Caller 12 Total
Fact Check Politics
John Kerry ‘Funneled’ State Department Funds to Daughter’s Organization?
Dec 8th, 2016 Dr. Vanessa Kerry's nonprofit organization, Seed Global Health, was awarded Peace Corps funding before and after her father, John Kerry, became U.S. Secretary of State; was there a conflict of interest?
Fact Check Politics
Did the White House Press Secretary Say That WWII Vets Upset About Japan Visit Should ‘Get Over It’?
Dec 7th, 2016 Comments made by Josh Earnest about diplomatic relations with Japan around the 2016 anniversary of Pearl Harbor did not include a directive that veterans should "get over it."
News Political News
Daily Caller Caught Lying Again
Updated The conservative web site falsely reported, then scrubbed, claims that former Miss Universe Alicia Machado was a "porn star."
Fact Check
Daily Caller Caught Lying Yet Again
Oct 20th, 2016 The Daily Caller lied and falsely reported that 16 states would be using voting machines controlled by a company with "deep links to George Soros."
Fact Check Business
Ford Motors Funds Black Lives Matter
Sep 26th, 2016 Multiple online outlets falsely reported that the Ford Motor Company had donated $100 million to the Black Lives Matter movement.
Fact Check Politics
Laila Alawa and the Department of Homeland Security
Jun 16th, 2016 Inaccurate reporting was common on the subject of Laila Alawa's appointment to a DHS advisory subcommittee on violent extremism.
Fact Check Political News
Washington State to Teach Transgenderism to Kindergartners
Jun 3rd, 2016 Reports of revised curriculum standards for Washington state led to false rumors claiming that schools there will be teaching "transgenderism" to Kindergarteners.
Fact Check Politics
Marine Assaulted at McDonald’s by Black Lives Matter Activists?
Feb 17th, 2016 Marine veteran Christopher Marquez was involved in an altercation at a Washington, D.C., McDonald's, but police said there was no indication the argument involved Black Lives Matter activists.
Fact Check Politics
Locker Gloom
Nov 5th, 2015 Online accounts of a controversy claimed President Obama ordered a Chicago school to "allow a transgender boy to use the girls' locker room" or else lose federal funding.
Fact Check Politics
Corona del Troll
Oct 23rd, 2015 No, a school in Tempe hasn't banned patriotic clothing and Trump t-shirts from a football game.
Wikipedia
It was part of her job. There was no spreadsheet. She did nothing illegal. She didn't leak anything.
The site is a partisan website known for fake news and is not a source of real news. This is the sort of misinformation you get if you rely on partisan sites (right or left) for real news. They have a partisan bent and will leave out or emphasize certain facts, giving the wrong impression. Additionally, The Daily Caller is a KNOWN source of fake news.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/04/us/politics/susan-rice-obama-trump-leak.html
Guess the NY Times is fake news too
Pray tell, what exactly DID Russia do? Actually DO?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?