Wehrwolfen
Banned
- Joined
- May 11, 2013
- Messages
- 2,329
- Reaction score
- 402
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
By Mac Slavo
June 29th, 2013
Rumors have circulated for years about the possibility of foreign troops being deployed on U.S. soil in the event of a widespread declaration of a national emergency. For quite some time there have been anecdotal reports to support the claim that the U.N., Russia and other nations would be used in a policing capacity should some critical event befall our nation.
The fear should such a scenario take place has been that these soldiers would act under the banner of their own flags, ignoring the fundamental protections afforded to our citizens, leaving Americans under the jurisdiction of people who don’t speak our language or respect our fundamental rights to self defense, to be secure in our homes, and to be presumed innocent in the eyes of the law.
Up until this point, nothing has ever been confirmed in writing, so officially no such foreign assistance has ever been agreed to. Thus, Americans had nothing to worry about.
All of this changed last week when representatives of Presidents Barrack Obama and Vladimir Putin met in Washington D.C., and not a single US-based news source reported it.
A press release posted on The Ministry of the Russian Federation for Civil Defense and Emergencies reports that the United States and Russia will now cooperate in disaster response operations that will include the exchange of “experts” during “joint rescue operations,” a term that has been broadly defined under the new agreement.
This includes rescuers, trainers and even military “security” teams:
The President of the Unites States has just authorized the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to deploy foreign troops on U.S. soil during a mass event that encompasses an any number of disaster scenarios, including but not limited to declarations of martial law.
(Excerpt)
Read more:
Foreign Boots on American Soil: Russia To Share Military "Security Experts" With United States During Mass Disaster Incidents and Emergencies
I have attempted to confirm this. In truth I don't know if this is on the up and up, or just another pipe dream cooked up by some Kook. After you read the above please assist in the research.
the whole foreign troops during emergency idea was first tinkered with under clinton,in which us soldiers were asked if they would fire upon us citizens if ordered to,the vast majority said no,but they answered they would fire upon british people if ordered to.the same was asked of brithish soldiers,the same answer came about,the british wouldnt fire upon inoccent british but had little remorse for americans.
im pretty sure people have pondered that evidence for over a decade to formulate something.
Does anyone believe that Obama would bring in foreign troops to quell unrest in America? If this occurred how would Americans react to this president and to this government?
The use of foreign troops to control and subjugate the populous is nothing new. Look back into history.
This whole thread is a load of bovine excrement. I joined the Navy during the first Reagan administration, and I know first-hand that we had observers from other nations on our ships while Reagan was president.
A more ironic note is that in Pearl Harbor, after our national anthem was played at 0800, we were required to continue standing at attention saluting the colors as the national anthem of every nation whose naval ships were visiting. It's pretty surreal standing at attention in Pearl Harbor listening to the Japanese national anthem.
check out some of Wehrwolfen's other fact-free threads aand you'll find the same BS.
Oddly, his source was not the most bat**** insane in this thread. Nothing holds a candle to the insane imagination at Infowars.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?