• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

For All You Conservatives That Made A Fuss About "Deplorables"....

The funny part is her trying to claim Democrats back Hamas. BIDEN COULD NOT TELL ISRAEL NO! They probably lost a bunch of votes that way, from people who believed Trump was just as likely to be a "peace candidate". You'd be amazed what kind of Republican voters would flock to Dems if they ever told AIPAC to shove it, but that's a purely hypothetical scenario.
 
Nope, I support free speech - she spoke.
So the BS about being called "deplorables" was an act or did it strike home? Anybody that supports the right of the spokesperson of the POTUS to denigrate over half of Americans like that is certainly a "deplorable". Wear it with pride.
 
LOL. You aren't even comparing apples to apples. The left has a large number of pro Palestinians supporters, a host of illegals and criminals skirting the boundaries of the justice system because of soft on crime judges. Are you denying this?
Your president pardoned 1500 criminals right after taking office. Your president is soft on crime. Are you denying this.
 
So the BS about being called "deplorables" was an act or did it strike home?
It basically disgusted us. Insulting fellow Americans because the found Clinton unacceptable as a President t

Anybody that supports the right of the spokesperson of the POTUS to denigrate over half of Americans like that is certainly a "deplorable". Wear it with pride.
Well I know you guys want the people to blindly accept your "wisdom" without comment. Sorry, Ain't gonna happen. But unlike your ilk, I fully support your right to bring it up.
 
Yes, she's claiming the Dems are "catering to" those people because they are the "main constituency" of Democratic politicians. Glad you're all caught up now.

She's very wrong. Consistently. Some would argue exclusively.

And, yes, this is obviously some of that "toning down the rhetoric" that we heard the GOP plead for time and again in the wake of the Charlie Kirk murder.
Who is the main constituency of the democrats then? And this is in no way comparable to what Hilary said
 
She speaks for your President. That's what your President thinks of the opposition party and a huge percentage of Americans.
He's telling much of America that he's not their President and he despises them.
Thats what Hillary did and you libs applauded
 
Funny....EVERY single democrat I know is NONE OF THE ABOVE What a dispicable lying bitch hack she is.

Well, she is a soulless gold-digger who to married a man 32 years her senior she admitted she has little in common with for money.

These people have no redeeming qualities whatsoever. Except Trump. The man can be genuinely funny.
 
Well, she is a soulless gold-digger who to married a man 32 years her senior she admitted she has little in common with for money.

These people have no redeeming qualities whatsoever. Except Trump. The man can be genuinely funny.
That may or may not be true, but what is true is that not only was she correct in her statement, but unleashed a flood of leftists who can dish it out but not take it. A twofer.
 
That may or may not be true, but what is true is that not only was she correct in her statement, but unleashed a flood of leftists who can dish it out but not take it. A twofer.

Sure. The Democrats' main constituency are literal Hamas Terrorists, illegal aliens and violent criminals. These are the main people who vote for the Democratic Party. 75 million terrorists (specifically belonging to Hamas), illegal aliens and violent criminals voted for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz in 2024.
 
No, shes right.
Call me naive, but I'm a bit disappointed by the lack of condemnation from the right for what Leavitt said after hearing non-stop how hateful and hyperbolic language leads to political violence. Whatever happened to toning down the rhetoric? If it's wrong to call people on the right nazis, why is it ok to call the left terrorists and criminals?
 
Thats what Hillary did and you libs applauded
You don't see the difference?
Trump is the President of the United States. Clinton was in an election campaign.
Does the term 'President' just imply more expression of toxic partisan hate?
What a ****ed-up social and political system you guys have developed.
 
She is literally the voice of the White House. The incendiary language is ramping up daily. If Portland is a war zone extreme action is justified. If Democrats are terrorists, aliens and violent criminals they must be dealt with.
And it's not even a year into this term.

It's how he's convinced them to villainize dissent. Anyone who doesn't obey Trump is an enemy...
 
I can't imagine anyone would vote for her.

She will never be elected.
 
lol.

you swallowed the right wing pundit version of that too without actually listening to what she said or thinking about it.

what is it like to be so easily manipulated?
what in Great Buddha's name are you talking about? I've seen the quote many times. You are correct in that I dont put a lot of thought into Hillary at all. This one was just sooo typically her smug superiority it was easily mocked..

Many of us even bought the shirt!

shopping
 
what in Great Buddha's name are you talking about? I've seen the quote many times. You are correct in that I dont put a lot of thought into Hillary at all. This one was just sooo typically her smug superiority it was easily mocked..

Many of us even bought the shirt!

shopping
It seems you dont even know what she said.

Prove me wrong by explaining which part of it you think was inaccurate.
 
Back
Top Bottom