• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fooled again

I'm not "MAGA" but Trump was FAR better for poor and middle-class Americans than is the current, corrupt, regime. The Biden Regime along with the Deep State goons have annihilated the standard of living of 300+ MILLION Americans, to your wild applause. Yea, incredible.
really, MAGA is for poor and middle class citizens, you insist
then why is the GQP submitting a proposal to give the wealthy a $7 Trillion tax break over the next 10 years
$7 Trillion, placed on the national credit card when the republicans were just insisting earlier this month that our nation's debt ceiling is too large

and the GQP is simultaneously proposing raising the age of retirement to become eligibile for social security
the poor and middle class NEED social security
they do not need a $7 Trillion tax break for the elite

so, how does that proposal reconcile with your pretense that the GQP is looking to help poor folks and the middle class
 
Not happening. Some are saying they don't know if it exists because they haven't examined it yet or are not part of the committee doing the investigation.

If Jack Smith openly acknowledged that evidence against Donald Trump "may or may not be legit" and that the evidence "may not even exist," I think you'd know how to process that.
 
What does that even mean; as if YOU have any idea who my "leader: is?
It means that there a quotes backing up the premise at the link.

We all know who your leaders are.
 
If Jack Smith openly acknowledged that evidence against Donald Trump "may or may not be legit" and that the evidence "may not even exist," I think you'd know how to process that.
He'd be foaming at the mouth over it.
 
Needs work. Here.

sarcasm_for_dummies_by_poisonheart555.jpg


You should probably [read it] before you make any more foolish comments.
winner.gif
 
It means that there a quotes backing up the premise at the link.

We all know who your leaders are.
Which illustrated the lack of complex medical function rampant on the left wing.
 
If a whistleblower dies in the forest, the Republicans made her up.
 
Three years, election time, it all just keeps pointing directly to Rudy.


 
Back
Top Bottom