• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Five family members shot to death

And neither do you
You have said that rights are negative in nature - but quite to reverse is true.

I think you meant "the".

Support your claim.
 
I think you have better chance of meeting a leprechaun and getting a pot of gold

It was your claim that rights are negative in nature
And yes, there is more chance of meeting that Leprechaun than you justifying your absurd assertion.
 
It was your claim that rights are negative in nature
And yes, there is more chance of meeting that Leprechaun than you justifying your absurd assertion.

As in the 1st Amendment (another one you dislike), the government is not to pass laws to prevent you from speaking-on political matters especially. That's a negative right.

The government is under no burden to provide for you a television station (at taxpayer expense) to enable you to speak more effectively though. That would be a positive right.
 
As in the 1st Amendment (another one you dislike), the government is not to pass laws to prevent you from speaking-on political matters especially. That's a negative right.

The government is under no burden to provide for you a television station (at taxpayer expense) to enable you to speak more effectively though. That would be a positive right.
It's willful ignorance.
 
Back
Top Bottom