What if it was actually aliens? What if it was aliens that were committing a hate crime?! :roll:
Now this is just trolling.One last time...
You have NO EVEIDENCE of ANYTHING about this incident so you dont KNOW if it is a hate crime or not. By CALLING it a hate crime you imply one group was specifically targeted by another for their religous standing.
i bet they were green ones.:mrgreen:
What if it was actually aliens? What if it was aliens that were committing a hate crime?! :roll:
Yes... the story would have changed. The current story is a mosque was burned down by unknown. The new story would be that a mosque was burned down by a Muslim.No, no....Hold up....I understand you are saying the same as the rest of us that we don't know who committed this crime, but I am just asking...What if it was a Muslim, misguided or not, would that make a difference in the story?
That would depend on why he or she burned down the mosque and if that reason accurately fits the definition of a hate crime according to the Penal Law of Tennessee.Would it still be a hate crime? or would everyone all of the sudden disappear from the thread faster than MSNBC's coverage of James Jay Lee?
Now this is just trolling.
I clearly said I do not KNOW if this was a hate crime or not.
I clearly did say that there was evidence TO SUGGEST that this may have been a hate crime.
Stop confusing the two and personally attacking me. You are making yourself look more and more childish.
PS - Your political lean is laughable.
For the record...there is NO evidence regarding THIS incident. You may have evidence of other actions or behaviors...but you havent got **** about THIS crime.
but good lord...dont I have a TON of evidence pointing to the fact that this is preCISELy the kind of thing Muslims do around the globe. Debating...I think the pictures of the villages burned to the ground and bloody beheaded bodies of Christian schoolgirls might be a BIT over the top...
Yes... the story would have changed. The current story is a mosque was burned down by unknown. The new story would be that a mosque was burned down by a Muslim.
That would depend on why he or she burned down the mosque and if that reason accurately fits the definition of a hate crime according to the Penal Law of Tennessee.
Please..by all means...show us your dramatic proof that THIS INCIDENT was a hate crime. Until you can...you have been full of **** on every post. WHEN you can...immediately go to the FBI and present them with your evidence.
Degreez said:I clearly said I do not KNOW if this was a hate crime or not.
I clearly did say that there was evidence TO SUGGEST that this may have been a hate crime.
Degreez said:I clearly said I do not KNOW if this was a hate crime or not.
I clearly did say that there was evidence TO SUGGEST that this may have been a hate crime.
Degreez said:I clearly said I do not KNOW if this was a hate crime or not.
I clearly did say that there was evidence TO SUGGEST that this may have been a hate crime.
Degreez said:I clearly said I do not KNOW if this was a hate crime or not.
I clearly did say that there was evidence TO SUGGEST that this may have been a hate crime.
Degreez said:I clearly said I do not KNOW if this was a hate crime or not.
I clearly did say that there was evidence TO SUGGEST that this may have been a hate crime.
Seriously, can you guys just start up a thread in the 'Conspiracy Theories' section if you want to keep throwing out speculations?
There is absolutely NO POINT in you people arguing over who you think did this act of violence. I am getting sick of reading all of these arguments going back and fourth when no one knows at this point who did it.
This insane act of violence is clearly hate driven... any act of violence is hate driven. And who ever committed this crime, when found, will have done nothing but destroyed their own cause.
HOLY ****ING ****!
Please understand the difference between the two.
Vance Mack said:For the record...there is NO evidence regarding THIS incident. You may have evidence of other actions or behaviors...but you havent got **** about THIS crime.
Yes... the story would have changed. The current story is a mosque was burned down by unknown. The new story would be that a mosque was burned down by a Muslim.
That would depend on why he or she burned down the mosque and if that reason accurately fits the definition of a hate crime according to the Penal Law of Tennessee.
Rather than freaking out at him for not understanding what you're saying, why don't you try to understand what he's saying?
HOLY ****ING ****!
Please understand the difference between the two.
Yes, I even said I agreed with him (that there was no evidence of who/why this crime was committed). I merely said that there was evidence to SUGGEST why this crime was committed. I clearly said that over the course of two pages. He repeatedly misinterpreted that into "there is evidence that this was a hate crime".
No, I never said that.
And I say again...please...by all means...produce your evidence to suggest that this was a hate crime.
Yes, I even said I agreed with him (that there was no evidence of who/why this crime was committed). I merely said that there was evidence to SUGGEST why this crime was committed. I clearly said that over the course of two pages. He repeatedly misinterpreted that into "there is evidence that this was a hate crime".
No, I never said that.
The facts on the ground support that this was most likely a hate crime.
You, just a few hours ago:
A plain reading of this statement indicates that you're claiming there is evidence this was a hate crime. He's asked you for it for a dozen posts.
Key words: most, likely
There is evidence to support the claim that this was a hate crime. Do you agree or disagree?
Except I did not say it exactly like you have it quoted above. I clearly said most likely. There is no point in trying to be disingenuous.You spent the past 20 posts arguing about how there was a difference between "there's evidence that this was a hate crime" and "there's evidence to support the claim that this was a hate crime."
I point out that you said the former and you respond by asking me if I agree with the latter.
Except I did not say it exactly like you have it quoted above. I clearly said most likely. There is no point in trying to be disingenuous.
Are conservatives really this desperate to keep this arson from coming across as a hate crime?
Let's see, how about the fact that their older mosque was vandalised with hate speech?
Are conservatives really this desperate to keep this arson from coming across as a hate crime?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?