• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

@FinnMacCool

Trajan Octavian Titus

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
20,915
Reaction score
546
Location
We can't stop here this is bat country!
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
All right you sanctimonious little sh!t let's see how you like it.

This guy recently started a thread to accuse me of political bias despite the fact that I back up every single one of my assertions with facts and evidence, since the inception of this thread he has so far not been able to disprove one of my statements and backs all of his own partisan statements with left wing rhetoric, opinion, and conjecture. His tactic of debate is to start off with a conclusion then repeat it enough times so that he can later attempt to pass it off as fact. I think his real beef with me is that I've been kicking liberal ass all over this site for the last two weeks or so.
 
"partisan statements with left wing rhetoric, opinion, and conjecture"

I didn't know Finn was so partisan, everyone can have their own opinions, unless we live in TrajanWorld.

I'm getting sick of your "partisan statements with right wing rhetoric, opinion, and conjecture":lol:
 
Be the bigger man, only a punk needs to lower themself to this basement fodder, a simple good day sir, seems to work for me.
 
What are you? Non partisan? My ass. Nobody is non partisan on a debate forum. I am extremely biased. I'm not trying to be fair. Don't whine to me just because you can't bother to respond rationally.

I attacked you based upon your method of arguing, not on your bias. Why would I be so stupid as to call you biased? Everyone here is biased.
 

My method of debate is the statement of facts to prove my assertions and as we all know facts are like kryptonite to liberals.
 
My method of debate is the statement of facts to prove my assertions and as we all know facts are like kryptonite to liberals
Click to expand...

Yes well if you consider Op-Ed pieces facts I cannot really help you there.
 
Well if you cannot disseminate facts from opinion found in op-ed pieces then I cannot really help you there.
Click to expand...

Why should I have to? Op-Eds aren't evidence. They might cite things that make it evidence but as you fail to actually provide these things then theres nothing left to say.
 

Ya how bout you're a fake ass, sucker ass, mark ass, trick.

And a wannabe libertarian poser.

p.s. just because I constantly prove you wrong doesn't mean that my facts are irrelevent.
 
FinnMacCool said:
Why should I have to? Op-Eds aren't evidence. They might cite things that make it evidence but as you fail to actually provide these things then theres nothing left to say.
Click to expand...

I never used the opinion found in an op-ed as fact I used a fact found in an op-ed as fact and just for fun I'll mention the fact that the NSA article on the front page of the NYT's was, by any rational definition of the term, an op-ed and I saw about four Democratic senators holding it up and saying this is proof that we must filibuster the Patriot Act.
 

Here's why you're wrong you have the right to PEACEFULLY assemble not act like a complete jack ass at public events:

peace·ful [pssfəl]
adj
1. quiet and calm: quiet, calm, and tranquil
a peaceful atmosphere

2. mentally calm: serene and untroubled in the mind

-peace·ful·ly, adv

Encarta ® World English Dictionary © & (P) 1998-2004 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

shout

shout [showt]
v (past shout·ed, past participle shout·ed, present participle shout·ing, 3rd person present singular shouts)
1. vt say something loudly: to say or utter something very loudly
2. vi speak loudly: to speak in a loud or angry voice

Encarta ® World English Dictionary © & (P) 1998-2004 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

Jordan's got the ball, Jordan fades back, Jordan shoots, and that's the ball game, peace out I'm outta here.
 
Apparently Finn is so MacCool that his own hate thread turns into a hate Trajan thread.
 

Shouting at a rock concerts is different from shouting at a public event with the intent of disrupting that said event, your comparison of a rock concert to a speech is just further proof that you're ****ing retarted.

PS why don't you go and suck on Chomsky's dick some more.
 
Last edited:
galenrox said:
you wanna know the funniest part? Right now Trojan's going through every post he has ever posted towards me to try to find a single time he's proven me wrong. I don't know how it could take so long, considering that he does it constantly!:doh
Click to expand...


No ****...must be busy with that manifesto undoubtedly in the works.
 

You go to a rock concert to get buck wild you go to a speech to listen, people pay to go to that speech to listen when you go to a speech to protest that's fine but you have to do it peacefully if you do not then you are not protected by the first amendment, again your comparison of the two is fallacious,

and since you must have read that part before I edited it I'll give it to you once again:

P.S. why don't you go suck off Chomsky's dick some more ****er?
 
Trajan Octavian Titus said:
I consider being hated by traitors and communists a badge of ****ing honor.
Click to expand...

Here's a definition for you.....

Main Entry: meg·a·lo·ma·nia
Pronunciation: "meg-&-lO-'mA-nE-&, -ny&
Function: noun
: a delusional mental disorder that is marked by infantile feelings of personal omnipotence and grandeur
 

Disrupting a public event is illegal consider this if you go to a movie theatre and start shouting in the middle of the movie you're going to get your ass kicked the **** out like it been said many times free speech is not permission to shout fire in a crowded theatre.
 

So what the **** is your definition of peaceful then because that wasn't mine I didn't make it up it's the ****ing dictionaries if you think that going into a public event, shouting down the speaker, and generally making an ass out of yourself is even remotely what the framers of the constitution had in mind when they wrote the first amendment then no offense but you are a ****ing retard.

As for the rest of this **** that you posted it's a bunch of ad-hominen attacks wrapped up in an attempt to make yourself feel superior.
 


Dude you're still not getting it you CAN act like a jack ass all you want just not when you're protesting a public event that's called an act of civil disobedience which is in fact a crime I'm not saying that it's all that bad or even wrong at all just that it's not covered under the first amendment as for the jack ass clause it's right ****ing here:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

I will relent that the the definition I was looking up was peacefully when it should have been peaceable but the definition of the latter is even more damning for your argument than the former:

peace·a·ble

peace·a·ble [pssəb’l]
adj
1. disposed toward peace: inclined toward peace and avoiding contentious situations
2. tranquil: tranquil and free from strife and disorder

Encarta ® World English Dictionary © & (P) 1998-2004 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

Now unless you can offer up an alternative defintion for peaceably then I'm going to use the one from the dictionary.

Thanks for the ad-hominem attacks though it only goes to further prove that you have no real argument . . . dick. :mrgreen:

How's that for a logical argument?

ps here's a good article by Thoreau on civil disobedience:

http://eserver.org/thoreau/civil.html
 
Last edited:
Trajan

Tray-gen
noun
1. Someone who used to be respected in this forum, but decided to take every debatable topic and turn it into a flame war with petty accusations
2. A previous non-prick(current status has changed)

cnredd ® World English Dictionary © & (P) 1970-2005 cnredd Corporation. All rights reserved.
 

Thanks alot thanx a god damn lot maybe if you ****ing people didn't start a thread with the specific intent of calling me out then I wouldn't be such a prick, I think that last post from me got my point a cross in a non-prick manner but if you would rather me be a prick then fine **** you, suck a dick, and here's a spoon so you can eat my ass. :mrgreen:
 
Woah, bad time of the month.

While you're at it Trajan, us liberals eat aborted baby soup and have gay sex orgies every night.
 

Grow up you worthless piece of ****.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…