- Joined
- May 22, 2013
- Messages
- 1,577
- Reaction score
- 584
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
There's a fair bit of cognitive dissonance going on with the conservatives regarding this Ferguson situation.
You don't trust government, but you appear to blindly belief anything that comes out from the Ferguson PD. Even confronted with straight up proof, you make every effort to deny, deflect or completely ignore evidence that gives credence to the idea that there's something fishy going on in Ferguson.
It's kind of pathetic.
No there isn't.See the thing is it would be stupid if I was completely making this up, howerever there are direct quotes and a audio recording to back up the claims.
See the thing is it would be stupid if I was completely making this up, howerever there are direct quotes and a audio recording to back up the claims.
Please don't reference cognitive dissonance without understanding what cognitive dissonance is. Your introductory psychology teacher/professor would be ashamed of your usage.
You think pointing lasers at aircraft is a laughable offense?
Maybe folks should be crying for you.
Stop deflecting.I would really like to see where I said that lasering an aircraft is a laughable offense, but I'm not going to hold my breath.
No sir, being a pilot and owning a few lasers, I do NOT think it is laughable. It is a form of assault IMO.
Is your position here so weak that you must resort to such absurd statements?
Stop deflecting.
You were the one saying they didn't know whether to laugh or cry at the information specifically showing that they intend to use lasers. Which is exactly as previously reported being used.
And you are already on record in this thread with the pathetically weak argument falsely claiming deception by the Gov when there was none.
Yeah, stop deflecting.
You saying you didn't know whether to laugh or cry at the provided info clearly says laughing was a possibility, and is why you were called on that bs as well.
Yes you are now deflecting again.Deflecting?
You do realize that lasers do not stop at 2000' of altitude don't you? Some artificial human construct like "airspace" or "temporary flight restriction" does not effect the distance travelled by laser light? Or don't you?
:dohTFR was requested for political reasons, and even the FAA acknowledged that.
Yes you are now deflecting again.
Everything you have been saying has already been addressed by the information provided by everyone else.
You now retorting with 2000 feet is just more deflection.
It was the reported gun shots they were protecting the press from. The lasers were what was reported later and is even more reason to keep the press aircraft out of the area now.
Just as they will be when the GJ decision is reached.
None of which is concocted as you falsely claim.
Or do you really not understand that?
So you have no point. Your claims were absurd
What is more funny is that you were saying the TFR's were silly, but now are pointing out the dangerous of lasers.
You can't even get your **** straight. :doh
:doh
Not once did they say any such thing. The TFR was over the threats in the area.
That is why they didn't want the press aircraft in the area. Either you understand that or you don't.
Your claims are nothing more than the product of convoluted thoughts.
Of course not.You and I do not share the same illusions.eace
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?