- Joined
- Sep 18, 2011
- Messages
- 83,708
- Reaction score
- 58,417
- Location
- New Mexico
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
The timing of the announcement wouldn't make any difference.
Yes animals.
What else would you call these beings that live only to destroy?
Mason66 said:Maybe animal was too good a term.
You would prefer that what we saw occur last night, occur during business hours when kids are on the streets, and when people would be in the buildings that were attacked, looted, and burned? Thanksgiving holiday is not like it used to be. Businesses still remain open and there would have been thousands of kids out of school milling around in the streets.
How do you think that would that have turned out? How many dead or injured? The town was going to burn anyway - it was a given based on what had happened before. To do so while the general public was out and about would have been irresponsible for the officials that had to make the decision.
What we should be condemning, are the people that shot guns at others, threw bricks, rocks and bottles at the police, burned police cars and private property.
Yes. Yes it would. Which is why politicians do Friday night dumps... where they only when the media is gone and the day is over THEN dump the bad news they don't want feedback on. Timing is strategic.
Personally I think the vast majority were simply protesting, but than a few extremely bad apples tipped the ****ing cart over.You think they "live only to destroy". That's about as ignorant as one can be. You don't know a damn thing about these people other than they are pissed and some are rioting.
Right! Waiting until a Friday evening to announce one of the biggest news stories of the year is going to make a huge difference. :roll:
Personally I think the vast majority were simply protesting, but than a few extremely bad apples tipped the ****ing cart over.
And here we are.
The thing that ticks me off, if it is true, is that I heard from various places that people were traveling to Ferguson to protest - and that many of the bad apples weren't even from Ferguson.Agreed.
The thing that ticks me off, if it is true, is that I heard from various places that people were traveling to Ferguson to protest - and that many of the bad apples weren't even from Ferguson.
The thing that ticks me off, if it is true, is that I heard from various places that people were traveling to Ferguson to protest - and that many of the bad apples weren't even from Ferguson.
Personally I think the vast majority were simply protesting, but than a few extremely bad apples tipped the ****ing cart over.
And here we are.
You think they "live only to destroy". That's about as ignorant as one can be. You don't know a damn thing about these people other than they are pissed and some are rioting.
There ya go.... dehumanize them that way anything that happens to them is justified in your mind.
What difference does it make where they were from. It was blacks doing what they do. Its been going on for as long as I can remember. This whole 'they weren't from Ferguson' nonsense is just a liberal way of trying to not acknowledge that fact.
The thing that ticks me off, if it is true, is that I heard from various places that people were traveling to Ferguson to protest - and that many of the bad apples weren't even from Ferguson.
Why didn't that vast majority do something to stop the bad apples?
I say that about the entire Republican Party almost every day.
You're an ass.What difference does it make where they were from. It was blacks doing what they do. Its been going on for as long as I can remember. This whole 'they weren't from Ferguson' nonsense is just a liberal way of trying to not acknowledge that fact.
A good question, that I am curious about the answer to.Why didn't that vast majority do something to stop the bad apples?
The grand jury found no evidence of a crime, so yes, Wilson is innocent.
A good question, that I am curious about the answer to.
Possibly the more violent persons were somewhat organized, whereas the vast majority was not?
Agreed. He is innocent, under the law, by presumption. He is, therefore, no more (nor any less) guilty than OJ.
Your lack of an argument is obvious. :lamo
You think they "live only to destroy". That's about as ignorant as one can be. You don't know a damn thing about these people other than they are pissed and some are rioting.
There ya go.... dehumanize them that way anything that happens to them is justified in your mind.
Stormfront is calling you. They miss you. Please go back.
Is anything I said not true. If so please elaborate. Thanks and have a nice day.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?