mpg
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2005
- Messages
- 7,795
- Reaction score
- 1,784
- Location
- Milford, CT
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Anything that's bad for the Obama Administration, is bad for Obama. Are you going to disagree with that?Yes, but Feinstein specifically said that he, as an individual, is not likely involved, so supporters of his entire administration may be relevant, but not supporters of him, as an individual.
The headline as posted is correct but it's not what Sen. Feinstein said. Her words were "I think" which to me at least says she's not sure that it is White House staffers who leaked the info. Even if it were the case, the leaker could just as easily be a rightie 'mole', an individual kept over from an earlier Administration for their supposed special knowledge.
We simply don't know at this point but never mind -- the Senator's words will be used to attack the President.
Supporters of the President aren't really relevant here since the President is not the one being accused of anything.
I'm no Obusha fan but if he is responsible because this happened on his watch, then I'll have to give in and accept that GW Bush was responsible for 9/11. Just how silly is this election season? So many real things and instead we target utter crap.
Accusations like this get more people to vote for Obusha than against him.
Bad relative to what? If other people leaked without his knowledge, then it's not necessarily "bad" relative to how his supporters view him as an individual which is my point.Anything that's bad for the Obama Administration, is bad for Obama. Are you going to disagree with that?
According to who?Last I remember Obama is the commander in chief and the buck stops with him.
Yes, but Feinstein specifically said that he, as an individual, is not likely involved, so supporters of his entire administration may be relevant, but not supporters of him, as an individual.
Bad relative to what? If other people leaked without his knowledge, then it's not necessarily "bad" relative to how his supporters view him as an individual which is my point.
According to who?
No, "the buck stops with him" in this case according to who?Then who is the Commander in Chief?
No, "the buck stops with him" in this case according to who?
I didn't say he doesn't carry responsibility for anything. I asked you a question: "the buck stops with him" in this case according to who? Are you going to answer the question or are you going to continue to deflect?Lets see, Obama is the Commander in Chief but he carries no responsibility for anything. Funny that is not what they say about Romney and Bain Capital.
Lets see, Obama is the Commander in Chief but he carries no responsibility for anything. Funny that is not what they say about Romney and Bain Capital.
I didn't say he doesn't carry responsibility for anything. I asked you a question: "the buck stops with him" in this case according to who? Are you going to answer the question or are you going to continue to deflect?
Yes, Obama can take credit when things go right but the nearest flunky always takes the blame when things go wrong.
In any case, Feinstein must have woken up with a horse's head in her bed. She's trying to walk back her statement.
Feinstein regrets speculating about leaks - CBS News
The wrath of Obama came down on her the same as Obama did to those that spoke in favor of Bain Capital. Obama's Chicago style thuggery at work again.
Right, but that's the post that prompted my question. I assume that the "buck stops with him" in this case according to you. And since you haven't bothered to defend that statement and instead just posted it like it was self-evident, all you have is an unsubstantiated opinion which I have no use for.I already answered that question, read post 29. I can't make it any clearer for you than that.
The headline as posted is correct but it's not what Sen. Feinstein said. Her words were "I think" which to me at least says she's not sure that it is White House staffers who leaked the info. Even if it were the case, the leaker could just as easily be a rightie 'mole', an individual kept over from an earlier Administration for their supposed special knowledge.
We simply don't know at this point but never mind -- the Senator's words will be used to attack the President.
Is Holder to busy with his contempt of congress problems to bother with leaking secret information that could cost us American lives.
and you 'know' this or you 'believe' this?
Right, but that's the post that prompted my question. I assume that the "buck stops with him" in this case according to you. And since you haven't bothered to defend that statement and instead just posted it like it was self-evident, all you have is an unsubstantiated opinion which I have no use for.
Maybe you can tell me who took them out behind the wood shed and beat the carp out of them, if it wasn't Obama?
Does anybody know what was leaked? If it's leaked, it's no longer a secret so please let me know WTF. Thank you.
Please Stand By, the far-righties need to get their marching orders from Fox News.
I'm not sure they've released those talking points yet.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?