FED's Lisa Cook- A Pattern of Lies

[mike2810]

The corrupt DC swamp taking care of it's own, once again.

an unsupported accusation, so noted.

 

[eohrnberger]

an unsupported accusation, so noted.

Triggered by 'corrupt DC swamp' were you?
Too bad, so sad (not sad) that you can't recognize what has been established history.

The case in point is obvious conflict of interest, and yet no recusals, which would have been appropriate.

Yeah, you are supporting 'Just Us' rather than 'justice', plain as day.
Do you realize that this is also anti-Democracy, anti-Truth and anti-Justice?

 

[mike2810]

Triggered by 'corrupt DC swamp' were you?

No. Just pointing out your generic unsupported statement if bs.

Too bad, so sad (not sad) that you can't recognize what has been established history.

and it seems you cannot recognize the group around Trump for what they are.

The case in point is obvious conflict of interest, and yet no recusals, which would have been appropriate.

what conflict of interest?

Yeah, you are supporting 'Just Us' rather than 'justice', plain as day.
Do you realize that this is also anti-Democracy, anti-Truth and anti-Justice?

Would you agree that Trump should lose his job as President because he falsely claimed square footage on his residence on a loan form?

 

[soap box]

There is no authoritarianism going on. That's just your overly vivid imagination running away with you.


You haven't even demonstrated / documented that there are any 'loyalists' on the Fed board.
Further, all Trump is pushing for is the lowering of the interest rates, this a weak case for proving he wants control over the fed.

Again, you appear to be merely and unthinkingly parroting the Dems, Libs and Progs talking points for them.
You'll get another gold star for your forehead from them, I'm sure.

I'm not concerned if you trust trump and that you'll defend him.

His constant lying has been going on for decades and you think that all the sudden he's telling the truth? That's why I'm not so concerned.

He spits out accusations followed by more accusations and he never comes up with any proof. For those of us who remember the pretrump era, his authoritarianism is obvious. These are big fat lies to get control of the Federal Reserve.

 

[eohrnberger]

No. Just pointing out your generic unsupported statement if bs.

You claim BS? You must be purposefully blind to the corruption which goes on in the DC swamp.

and it seems you cannot recognize the group around Trump for what they are.

All those accusations from the LW smear propagandists?
True, I don't believe them, given their long established track record of their propaganda and smear campaigns.
What's odd is that you don't recognize that for what it is, as I've accurately and truthfully described.

what conflict of interest?

See post #98 of this thread.

Would you agree that Trump should lose his job as President because he falsely claimed square footage on his residence on a loan form?

That obviously politically motivated case?
I consider that more or less the same category as the LW smear propagandists, only worse, in that is a case of weaponizing the legal system for political purposes.

 

[eohrnberger]

I'm not concerned if you trust trump and that you'll defend him.

His constant lying has been going on for decades and you think that all the sudden he's telling the truth? That's why I'm not so concerned.

He spits out accusations followed by more accusations and he never comes up with any proof. For those of us who remember the pretrump era, his authoritarianism is obvious. These are big fat lies to get control of the Federal Reserve.

The repetition demonstrated in this post of yours doesn't strengthen your argument.
If anything all it shows is your pre-ordained conclusions and the desperate search to somehow support them, and not very well, I may add.

 

[mike2810]

You claim BS? You must be purposefully blind to the corruption which goes on in the DC swamp.

not blind. Just know that Trump is also part of it. Or are you blind to that?

All those accusations from the LW smear propagandists?

no.

True, I don't believe them, given their long established track record of their propaganda and smear campaigns.

Do you believe everything Trump and his supporters say is the truth?

What's odd is that you don't recognize that for what it is, as I've accurately and truthfully described.

0%

See post #98 of this thread.

Would you accept if the judge was one that Trump appointed during his first term?

That obviously politically motivated case?
I consider that more or less the same category as the LW smear propagandists, only worse, in that is a case of weaponizing the legal system for political purposes.

It is a fact Trump overstated the square footage and value of his home to get a better rate.
Do you recognize any RW smear propaganda?

 

[soap box]

The repetition demonstrated in this post of yours doesn't strengthen your argument.
If anything all it shows is your pre-ordained conclusions and the desperate search to somehow support them, and not very well, I may add.

He's been lying about everything for decades and you think he's suddenly telling the truth? This is A stupid lie for authoritarian control.

 

[eohrnberger]

not blind. Just know that Trump is also part of it. Or are you blind to that?

Trump, a total outsider to the entrenched political elite, the same political elites which hate him, Trump is actually part of the political elite's machinations?
How does that make any common sense at all?

no.

Do you believe everything Trump and his supporters say is the truth?

No, I believe there's a large part of it which is hyperbole, so I always take all of that with a large gain of salt, and wait the regular 48 to 72 hours for the other 1/2 of the story to come out to be more complete. In that, there's often times that Trump is correct, even after taking a measure of his hyperbole 'off the top'.

0%

This answer exhibiting confirmation bias and in opposition to the already well established track record of blatant political bias from the Dems', Libs', and Progs' compliant and complicit MSM hoax and smear propaganda.

Would you accept if the judge was one that Trump appointed during his first term?

No, the conflict of interest is obvious, and its rather inconsistent that it isn't being addressed, so fair enough to say that this case is a case of the DC swamp taking care of their own.

It is a fact Trump overstated the square footage and value of his home to get a better rate.
Do you recognize any RW smear propaganda?

No harm, no foul.
Its not like the people who accepted the terms of that deal didn't have their own resources to validate those claims and those terms, and, after all, the deal came to a conclusion to everyone's satisfaction.
No harm, no foul.

It was a solely politically motivated prosecution, clearly.