The Obama administration filed a federal hate-crimes charge Thursday against a man whom authorities accused of using the “knockout game” to target a black man, videotaping it, and then bragging about the assault to strangers.
The charge marks the first time the administration has taken action on a “knockout” case after the game became an Internet and media phenomenon. It chose a case in which the person accused is white, even though.most other cases reported in the news have involved black assailants
He will do well in prison.
CRUE CAB said:He will do well in prison
No he won't. He's bi-polar.
No he won't. He's bi-polar.
Probably the single largest broad brush term in psych. It literally means nothing, as it is an umbrella for about 40 separate conditions, often times having no relation to one another nor existing in the same person. Mild mood disorder to hospitalize on sight.
I loathe the term. It just shows me how clueless psych really is. More or less, it's designed around medication management.
... and the pharmacological-industrial complex.
No he won't. He's bi-polar.
It's a heinous cowardly thing to do to anyone, but to announce the race element, and brag about it, is begging for the extra penalty to be applied. As for the ludicrous idea that he's the only white guy to have ever done it, anyone pushing that has severe problems with reality.
Hate crime legislation -- the idea that doing the exact same illegal physical act is more illegal if you think the way the state does not like.
Yes, because our Democracy has had people vote legislators into power who believe this. Because the majority of the population wants to send a message that this type of behavior is unacceptable. This idea that the state exists in some kind of vacuum is foolish. "The state" is a reflection of the will of the voters.
You mean this thinking is unacceptable? The exact same physical act is more illegal because your thinking is not state approved.
Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia, right?
You mean this thinking is unacceptable? The exact same physical act is more illegal because your thinking is not state approved.
Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia, right?
ignore what i said
Yes, that's a fair characterization, and not at all blatantly dishonest.You said that the false security of consensus should be used to punish thought, right?
Yes, that's a fair characterization, and not at all blatantly dishonest.
You CANT be stupid enough to believe that anyone is supporting the idea that the perpetrator is the 'victim'...right? SURELY you have at LEAST enough going on in your dome to recognize that the upset is over the blatant hypocrisy of ignoring the knockout game, minimizing it, pretending it isnt a problem, doing nothing about it then BOOM...all of a sudden there is fed involvement when a white guy punches a black guy. There have been numerous incident requiring hospitalization, permanent damage, and in some cases even death...but none of those were deemed significant. THIS incident demands action? Hypocrisy.Yeah, guy acts like an idiot, and apparently he's the victim.
It's a heinous cowardly thing to do to anyone, but to announce the race element, and brag about it, is begging for the extra penalty to be applied. As for the ludicrous idea that he's the only white guy to have ever done it, anyone pushing that has severe problems with reality.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?