- Joined
- Apr 18, 2013
- Messages
- 94,343
- Reaction score
- 82,729
- Location
- Barsoom
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
12/18/18
A specially appointed federal panel of judges has dismissed all 83 ethics complaints brought against Justice Brett Kavanaugh regarding his conduct at his confirmation hearings. The judges concluded that while the complaints "are serious," there is no existing authority that allows lower court judges to investigate or discipline Supreme Court justices. The complaints against Kavanaugh ranged from allegations that he had misled the Senate about some of his activities in the George W. Bush White House to his angry, partisan statements in denying charges of sexual assault in high school. After the hearings concluded, Chief Justice John Roberts appointed a special judicial council panel of judges from the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals to look into the ethics complaints against Kavanaugh. But shortly thereafter, Kavanaugh was confirmed for a lifetime seat on the U.S. Supreme Court. And on Tuesday, Chief Judge Tim Tymkovich, of the 10th Circuit, acknowledged that while the complaints "are serious," the judicial council panel is obligated to dismiss them, because it has no authority over Kavanaugh.
Because he was confirmed in spite of facing all those ethics charges, the ethics charges automatically go away.
He is literally above the law.
Were his friends PJ, Tobin , Squeeze and Needle Dick Nick on that panel?
So thats if they are innocent.Federal Panel Of Judges Dismisses All 83 Ethics Complaints Against Brett Kavanaugh
Brett Kavanaugh
A charade by Roberts. The only real mode of accountability for a SCOTUS Justice is Congressional impeachment and conviction.
The representatives of the people have spoken.
We The People decide.
Yeah. I mean, even though there isn't any actual proof that he did any of the crap he was accused of and even though information has come out that at least some of the accusations were completely made up the guy really should be impeached because, y'know, Hillary never would have picked him.
What is happening to our country.
What would you have done? And, based on what evidence? I'm asking because I haven't seen any actual evidence myself, and with your posts in numerous threads implying your fervent belief that he should never had been put on the SCOTUS and should now be removed by impeachment from the SCOTUS, I would like to know what you're basing that belief upon.
Although like you I think she was taking from real trauma experience. After even breif review of Grassley's report: https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-11-02 Kavanaugh Report.pdf. I am not sure how anyone can still suspect reflected anything to do with Kavanaugh; especially, with another man having come forward and said he may have been the one involved although he insists he remembers the girl initiating the encounter.I personally believe Blasey's testimony against Kavanaugh. Her story is too vivid, too emotionally personal, and too similar to every other assault story I've heard for it to be a lie.
I personally believe Blasey's testimony against Kavanaugh. Her story is too vivid, too emotionally personal, and too similar to every other assault story I've heard for it to be a lie.
Prove he's a rapist. Actual evidence. Show the proof.Basically an attempted rapist has been elected to the highest court,
Even though she couldn't recall the time or place the incident supposedly took place? Not to mention the fact that she couldn't get anyone to confirm her story?
Prove he's a rapist. Actual evidence. Show the proof.
You the people refuse to properly vet your public officials? Trump and kavanaugh and trumps cabinet all slipping through the cracks of reasonable oversight.The representatives of the people have spoken.
We The People decide.
You the people refuse to properly vet your public officials? Trump and kavanaugh and trumps cabinet all slipping through the cracks of reasonable oversight.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Ok. Do a better job then. Dont let a dude with 80 complaints get rammed through approvals. Dont hypocritically forgive or deny all of the sexual deviance of a candidate and all of the awful business practices.The remedy for crappy representatives is to get better ones.
This is not rocket science.
Ok. Do a better job then. Dont let a dude with 80 complaints get rammed through approvals. Dont hypocritically forgive or deny all of the sexual deviance of a candidate and all of the awful business practices.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Although like you I think she was taking from real trauma experience. After even breif review of Grassley's report: https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-11-02 Kavanaugh Report.pdf. I am not sure how anyone can still suspect reflected anything to do with Kavanaugh; especially, with another man having come forward and said he may have been the one involved although he insists he remembers the girl initiating the encounter.
It not like this shenanigans have happen before with Clarence Thomas or anything...
I am not saying differently. I am highlighting the fact that since someone else came forward and testified under oath to being the likely person from her story[in the report]. I find it very difficult to believe anyone no matter how credible they find her can still think she wasn't mistaken by politics/pressure that this involved Kavanaugh.So what if she initiated the encounter? Even if true, one consent doesn't mean unlimited consent. Just because someone says yes initially doesn't give you unlimited access to their person.
Yeah. I mean, even though there isn't any actual proof that he did any of the crap he was accused of and even though information has come out that at least some of the accusations were completely made up the guy really should be impeached because, y'know, Hillary never would have picked him.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?