And sex isn't always for procreation. Understand that yet?
It ought to be.And sex isn't always for procreation. Understand that yet?
My wife hasn't been able to procreate for 22 years, you mean we were supposed to stop having sex?
Sorry, that ain't happening. We're in our 50's and still enjoy a good romp in the sack.
>>>>
The act is still ordered towards procreation even if there is natural infertility.
Thanks for back-peddling.
>>>>
My wife hasn't been able to procreate for 22 years, you mean we were supposed to stop having sex?
Sorry, that ain't happening. We're in our 50's and still enjoy a good romp in the sack.
>>>>
exactly.
and yes, Paleocon, you back-pedaled.
exactly.
and yes, Paleocon, you back-pedaled.
It ought to be.
For any undecided people reading this, note:
I have made rational arguments, showing why sodomy is wrong.
And those arguing against me have called me a "complete raging hypocrite", a "depraved busybody", and "doomed".
You can see which position is supported by reason, and which one is backwards illogical thinking.
No, you haven't made any rational arguments why sodomy is wrong. And if you look at the definition of "sodomy" that includes oral sex as well. I think you are going to have a real big problem convincing the majority of people in the U.S. that oral sex is wrong. Maybe you like a boring sex life, but most don't.
Yes I did. I'm aware of that. Reasonable people don't believe that objective truth bends to popular opinion.
Well the majority of people don't follow your idea of "reasonable", which is a good thing. So you have just proven your ideas irrelevant to todays time. Thank you for that. Oh BTW, the idea of "reasonable" is subjective. The majority of people don't find oral sex wrong. It seems YOUR view on sodomy is archaic and best left to the grave when you pass. Good riddance when that happens.
It seems YOUR view on sodomy is archaic and best left to the grave when you pass. Good riddance when that happens.
And those arguing against me have called me a "complete raging hypocrite", a "depraved busybody", and "doomed".
Absolute ludicrousness, reason is objective, whether an individual person feels that sodomy is wrong is subjective. Oh the absolute arrogance of most modern people, tonking that we know better than virtually everyone who has come before, when in reality we are even less civilized then they were.
And now I've been wished dead as well. How reasonable and tolerant. Make no mistake, this display of hatred shows the true face of the anti-God crowd.
For any undecided people reading this, note:
I have made rational arguments, showing why sodomy is wrong.
And those arguing against me have called me a "complete raging hypocrite", a "depraved busybody", and "doomed".
You can see which position is supported by reason, and which one is backwards illogical thinking.
You haven't made reasonable arguments. You have said sodomy is wrong because it doesn't lead to procreation; you then say it's ok to have sex even if you know you won't procreate. Those two things don't go together. If you are against sodomy because it doesn't lead to procreation, you should be against any sex except that done when you have a good reason to think pregnancy will result.
This is actually one of the things very different for humans - unlike other animals that mate only when a female is in heat - and thus likely to get pregnant - humans can mate at any time; we get aroused even outside of being of heat. This is how "nature" has made us, if you want to use that terminology. We are lucky that we can enjoy the closeness and bonding of sex at any time. And that we can "get off" in lots of different ways - whether oral stimulation, by hands, by vibrators, by anal sex, by **** between breasts, by all the other many variations we have dreamed off.
AND we can procreate even if we aren't a male/female pairing due to IVF.
Isn't it an amazing thing where our brains, talents, creativity combined with a nature that allows us to enjoy this at any time, not just when the female is in heat?
And you worry about the gender of the people involved or the type of act? Oh, what a narrow world you must have!
Again - because you have contradicted yourself - "sex is for procreation but yes you can have sex if you know you are infertile" makes your one argument against sodomy is invalid and not rational
Reasonable people can see the difference between a deliberate human act and a natural occurrence. It's that simple really.
Reasonable people can see the difference between a deliberate human act and a natural occurrence. It's that simple really.
What is that difference? And is there something that makes them 'morally' different?Reasonable people can see the difference between a deliberate human act and a natural occurrence. It's that simple really.
What is that difference? And is there something that makes them 'morally' different?
Nature has decided our sex activity is not tied to procreation.
So you deny that the sexual faculty is oriented towards procreation?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?