None yet. But ultimately when the issue comes before the Supreme Court, Loving will absolutely play a role.
You do realize that many heterosexual couples these days enjoy sodomy? Personally I think it's pretty gross, but those women and men that share in the experience say it's only because I never have (and never will).Scalia was right. This is what happens when sodomy is declared a constitutional right.
What are they waiting for?
If you don't know how things get to the USSC, then you need to get some education first.
What are they waiting for?
Calm down.
There were two recent gay marriage cases where they chose to ignore Loving. Why?
If you don't know how things get to the USSC, then you need to get some education first.
Salt Lake City has had a history of very good progressive mayors. One of my favorites was Rocky Anderson.
You do realize that many heterosexual couples these days enjoy sodomy? Personally I think it's pretty gross, but those women and men that share in the experience say it's only because I never have (and never will).
So I am curious, is it okay to outlaw the sexual acts of heterosexuals or just homosexuals?
It can be frustrating trying to deal with people who aren't educated. Many people come to debate an issue whithout fully understanding the issues involved.
The Court ALWAYS takes the most narrow approach in deciding cases before them, when at all possible. Do you understand jurisprudence at all?
If you understood the way the legal process works you would understand that it takes a while for a case to get to the Supreme Court. Don't worry...it will...and when it does...you aren't going to like the outcome. As Scalia says, the writing is on the wall.
So you intend on putting the government in the bedrooms of every American? Not very conservative, small government minded, are you?Yes I'm aware of that. I would have no problem outlawing unnatural sexual practices like that, whether committed by homosexuals or heterosexuals.
Because many parents don't consider gay marriage to be a civil rights issue.
So you intend on putting the government in the bedrooms of every American? Not very conservative, small government minded, are you?
What are they waiting for?
It is quite republican (and democrat) to do.
And many parents don't consider evolution to be true
Sucks to be them or their child
Because the supreme court in the recent gay marriage cases made no argument that they are. And also majority force rule.
And another right winger throws "small govt" under the bus
It did? The decision said they were not entitled to those things?
And I dont understand your last, incomplete sentence.
Yes, they can. They just cannot discriminate against protected classes. We offer benefits for state workers that we do not offer to all, we offer the priviledge of driving to some and restrict who gets to drive, and on and on.
Then please explain the need for the 15th and 19th amendments. While you are at it, please explain the need for the 18th (and thus the 21st) amendment since it took no such constitutional action to outlaw hundreds of other recreational drugs nationwide. The nonsense logic that "this is much like that", so therefore "that covers this too" is a very recent trick used by the SCOTUS. It is obvious to all that the 2A right differs greatly among the several states, yet no federal judge has seen fit to "fix" that unequal protection of the law.
And you don't seem to get it. No state is saying gays can not get married. Anyone can marry someone of the opposite sex. You gay marriage people like to gloss over that part. So they are NOT discriminating, it is the same for all. You want marriage changed.
Perhaps the same reason that beer/alcohol sales are restricted upon the Christian sabbath - tradition of the majority. Surly a constitutional "right" present since 1868 could not have gone unnoticed for such a long time and in nearly every state.
So you intend on putting the government in the bedrooms of every American? Not very conservative, small government minded, are you?
And another right winger throws "small govt" under the bus
Yes I'm aware of that. I would have no problem outlawing unnatural sexual practices like that, whether committed by homosexuals or heterosexuals.
What country do you live in?
In America, we have a Constitution that supposedly limits the role of government in people's lives.
Certainly in their bedrooms. I would think you'd approve of sodomy....no unwanted babies produced to be murdered.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?