- Joined
- Sep 30, 2019
- Messages
- 53,577
- Reaction score
- 80,862
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Wholeheartedly agree. America has had a taste of fascism and many people find it to their liking.I'm not so sure.
Wholeheartedly agree. America has had a taste of fascism and many people find it to their liking.I'm not so sure.
Neither am I.I'm not so sure.
Yep. Too many of us either like the lawlessness of the current trump Administration and support the restrictions he is imposing, revel in the punishment of his enemies, or are simply indifferent to what's happening, because, in their magical thinking, they and theirs will never be negatively impacted.Wholeheartedly agree. America has had a taste of fascism and many people find it to their liking.
Presidents have to obey the constitution. When they don’t, the courts are specifically empowered to stop them. If Trump doesn’t like having his ass handed to him in court so often, by both Republican and Democrat judges, he should stop wiping his ass with the constitution.justice is a game SCOTUS inability to reign in District courts nationwide TROs has made the courts the supreme branch of government
Completely unchecked power over the presidency
I agree. Trump and his minions are getting away with ignoring laws and judicial orders. He and his are learning that there little political will to rein him in, along with the fact there's little in the Constitution that can bring to heel a lawless Chief Executive.FWIW, good, but I suspect that the country is passing the point where court rulings can actually stop him. We are careening towards autocracy.
It seems that Mycroft has a rather limited political vocabulary! I sometimes wonder whether he just has preprepared phrases saved in his computer to form his replies from. i.e. "Press Alt/A" for the judicial activism words. Maybe someone else even programmed all that for him?
You are taking a "response" and trying to turn back time to a point prior to the implementation of these policies/ex-actions and alluding to it as being "planned", as if all these groups knew ahead of time what Donny would specifically do before he took office. It is a conspiracy theory, but then, that is the environment your lot has created. From Q-anon to eating pets, it is all just one big bag of shit, and you just keep producing new bags of shit out of the crap Donny dumps. The creativity, the effort is astounding and bemusing. I will never understand how one gets this deep.As I said, this was planned.
FWIW, good, but I suspect that the country is passing the point where court rulings can actually stop him. We are careening towards autocracy.
This judicial activism and opposition was planned way before Trump won his election.
Stupid comment.No kidding.
He and his handlers published what they were going to do. And he lied when he said he didn’t know anything about Project 2025.
When the opposition hands you their playbook before the game of course you plan.
WW
You didn't read the articles, did you?You are taking a "response" and trying to turn back time to a point prior to the implementation of these policies/ex-actions and alluding to it as being "planned", as if all these groups knew ahead of time what Donny would specifically do before he took office.
This judicial activism and opposition was planned way before Trump won his election.
Yes. That's the kind of nonsense response I've come to expect from you.Blah ****ing blah
George Soros. Jews for Hamas.He might be involved is some, but it's not just him.
Here's what Copilot says...
who is paying for all the lawsuits against the trump administrationThe funding for lawsuits against the Trump administration comes from various sources, including state governments, cities, nonprofit organizations, and private entities. For example, Denver has joined lawsuits challenging federal funding cuts, and multiple states have sued over budget freezes2. Additionally, universities like Harvard have filed lawsuits over revoked federal funding.Many of these legal challenges are backed by advocacy groups and legal organizations that raise funds through donations and grants. Some lawsuits are also supported by congressional appropriations meant to reimburse cities for costs incurred due to federal policies
Here are a couple articles on the subject...
![]()
Activist groups prepare for legal battles during Trump 2.0
As the incoming team develops executive orders and initiatives, critics are hiring staff and reviewing lessons of the first term.www.marketplace.org
![]()
Trump agenda has states, advocacy groups girding for legal battles
California, New York and Illinois are among states readying to sue the Trump administration over divisive social issues.www.legaldive.com
As I said, this was planned.
The system is working exactly the way it is supposed to.justice is a game SCOTUS inability to reign in District courts nationwide TROs has made the courts the supreme branch of government
Completely unchecked power over the presidency
shrug...George Soros. Jews for Hamas.
![]()
![]()
I'll answer that: Because of laws and federal money.why in hell does the executive have ANY say over how colleges operate?
So you want to make lawsuits illegal?He might be involved is some, but it's not just him.
Here's what Copilot says...
who is paying for all the lawsuits against the trump administrationThe funding for lawsuits against the Trump administration comes from various sources, including state governments, cities, nonprofit organizations, and private entities. For example, Denver has joined lawsuits challenging federal funding cuts, and multiple states have sued over budget freezes2. Additionally, universities like Harvard have filed lawsuits over revoked federal funding.Many of these legal challenges are backed by advocacy groups and legal organizations that raise funds through donations and grants. Some lawsuits are also supported by congressional appropriations meant to reimburse cities for costs incurred due to federal policies
Here are a couple articles on the subject...
![]()
Activist groups prepare for legal battles during Trump 2.0
As the incoming team develops executive orders and initiatives, critics are hiring staff and reviewing lessons of the first term.www.marketplace.org
![]()
Trump agenda has states, advocacy groups girding for legal battles
California, New York and Illinois are among states readying to sue the Trump administration over divisive social issues.www.legaldive.com
As I said, this was planned.
Dude all ya’ll scream is Sorosshrug...
I don't pay enough attention to Soros to know if that's true or not.
Indeed. The effort put into your post was nothingness.shrug...
Yet, you responded.I don't pay enough attention to Soros to know if that's true or not.
Federal judge blocks Trump administration from barring foreign student enrollment at Harvard
Right. So, what else is new?
This judicial activism and opposition was planned way before Trump won his election.
No to the federal money part. First money cannot be conditioned after the fact. The government cannot attach strings to money after it's been accepted. And even when strings are attached the government usually can only take the money back. That does not apply here.I'll answer that: Because of laws and federal money.
No.So you want to make lawsuits illegal?
...or how much Walmart charges for goods, or where people put tiny little screws into iPhones, or which legal firms can represent the government, or what we call the Gulf of Mexico, or...The system is working exactly the way it is supposed to.
And while we're at it why in hell does the executive have ANY say over how colleges operate?
I'm not the one who brought up Soros in this thread.Dude all ya’ll scream is Soros