• We will be taking the server down at approximately 3:30 AM ET on Wednesday, 10/8/25. We have a hard drive that is in the early stages of failure and this is necessary to prevent data loss. We hope to be back up and running quickly, however this process could take some time.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FBI releases Clinton investigation documents

You're wasting your breath. You have nothing prosecutable on Hillary. Time for you to accept that she will be the next President.

there is a ton of evidence anyone can see it if they can actually use their brain.
the FBI has now released all the evidence they have.

but some people refuse to see the truth and have been brainwashed so badly that the honestly don't care.
it is a real shame.
 
Actually, I think she left it up to IT experts and her aides to discard the old devices. I don't think Clinton is very tech suavy or handled any of the technical stuff herself. Come to think of it...the vast majority who use mobile devices don't either. They either get it repaired by an IT person...or buy a new one.

Moot, yet again of concern, while you have "people" to do so, they are still your people..... It is your phone and to "trust" your people to take care of things.... what if the IT guy, said screw you, tossed it in the trash, They found it, data dumped it and found out it was Mrs. Clinton's phone? Who would get in trouble? Everyone, not just the IT staff and not just Hilary.

The point Im trying to make is you still hold some responsibility......and ignorance....does not always justify negligence in my opinion unfortunately.

Again..... 1st lady, Senator, Secretary of State. Not once did security of information cross her mind? ..... Really????
 
there is a ton of evidence anyone can see it if they can actually use their brain.
the FBI has now released all the evidence they have.

but some people refuse to see the truth and have been brainwashed so badly that the honestly don't care.
it is a real shame.

The long and short of your statement is that you can't prove squat and you're still relying on innuendo and insinuation.
 
Reagan set up private servers for the explicit purpose of circumventing FOIA and Subpoena request ??? And then lied about it again and again and again ??
The FBI report said that in 2009 Colin Powell sent Clinton an email on how to avoid the FOIA requests. But she didn't follow his advice because most of her emails were to .gov addresses and preserved on the State Department server.

The FBI found no evidence that she lied, obstructed justice or acted with criminal intent.
 
The long and short of your statement is that you can't prove squat and you're still relying on innuendo and insinuation.


I have a serious questions, Lets take out any criminal wrong doing and the fact that people want to throw her in jail... OK Gone.....

Her actions regardless of consequence. Do they represent a leader that you WANT to represent you and your country and your values.

This is the bigger issue..... I dont care if she gets arrested, charged, fined, slap on the wrist or a bad Meme on the internet....


But I have a hard time believing that she would have the best interest of the American People and represent the core values that many of us hope our leader represents.... This is my concerns..... these proofs, documentation, speculation whatever you want to call it..... Puts a huge question mark....in her abilities.......
 
The long and short of your statement is that you can't prove squat and you're still relying on innuendo and insinuation.

I did prove it. The FBI has released some of the evidence that they could.

so why do you reject facts? She lied, she intently mishandled and was grossly negligent with classified data.

It is pretty much a fact at this point that the DOJ and the FBI committed collusion, corruption and obstruction so that
she would not have to actually face charges simply because she is running for president when there are currently
people in the military being accused of way lesser charges the same way and are facing expulsion from the military
based on that.

the fact that you can't address anything is more telling.
 
I have a serious questions, Lets take out any criminal wrong doing and the fact that people want to throw her in jail... OK Gone.....

Her actions regardless of consequence. Do they represent a leader that you WANT to represent you and your country and your values.

This is the bigger issue..... I dont care if she gets arrested, charged, fined, slap on the wrist or a bad Meme on the internet....


But I have a hard time believing that she would have the best interest of the American People and represent the core values that many of us hope our leader represents.... This is my concerns..... these proofs, documentation, speculation whatever you want to call it..... Puts a huge question mark....in her abilities.......

most liberals don't care. this is like asking a squirrel if it wants a nut.
 
Actually, I think she left it up to IT experts and her aides to discard the old devices. I don't think Clinton is very tech suavy or handled any of the technical stuff herself. Come to think of it...the vast majority who use mobile devices don't either. They either get it repaired by an IT person...or buy a new one.

And yet, she is responsible for everything that happens in her agency.

Since she dropped the ball here, do you REALLY want her to be responsible for the whole Executive Branch?
 
I did prove it. The FBI has released some of the evidence that they could.

so why do you reject facts? She lied, she intently mishandled and was grossly negligent with classified data.

It is pretty much a fact at this point that the DOJ and the FBI committed collusion, corruption and obstruction so that
she would not have to actually face charges simply because she is running for president when there are currently
people in the military being accused of way lesser charges the same way and are facing expulsion from the military
based on that.

the fact that you can't address anything is more telling.

You haven't proven jack. Hillary said she didn't recall. You haven't proven that she did recall and lied.
 
And yet, she is responsible for everything that happens in her agency.

Since she dropped the ball here, do you REALLY want her to be responsible for the whole Executive Branch?

If the alternative is Trump?

Yes. That's how bad he is. Too be fair to him he's trying desperately to lose. He's the Reginald Perrin of politics.
 
I have a serious questions, Lets take out any criminal wrong doing and the fact that people want to throw her in jail... OK Gone.....

Her actions regardless of consequence. Do they represent a leader that you WANT to represent you and your country and your values.

This is the bigger issue..... I dont care if she gets arrested, charged, fined, slap on the wrist or a bad Meme on the internet....


But I have a hard time believing that she would have the best interest of the American People and represent the core values that many of us hope our leader represents.... This is my concerns..... these proofs, documentation, speculation whatever you want to call it..... Puts a huge question mark....in her abilities.......

It's only a question mark in the minds of those who...

1. Care about the rule of law.

2. Care about competence.

3. Care about honesty.

4. Cares about the underlying motivations of their President.

Anybody who doesn't have these cares don't give a rat's ass about any of this stuff and they'll vote for a serial killer if she has a (D) after her name. (that's not to say I accuse Hillary of being a serial killer...but she does have a lot of blood on her hands)
 
As a reasonable person given a binary choice of Trump or Clinton, I'll take Clinton EVERY time. Most if not all unreasonable people disagree.

You are an unprincipled fool if you think that giving such a corrupt and irresponsible person such as Hillary even more power of office is the right thing to do.
 

:eek: You are ****ting me!


I want to see a consequence from this.

Is there anybody here that doesn't?

Oh hell yeah. Isn't anyone that puts the entire nation's national security at risk charged? (Oh I forget, she's of the political elite, never mind)
So she lied to the FBI during an investigation.
Where are the perjury charges and making false statements to law enforcement?

Wasn't Martha Stewart charged, convicted and served time for exactly this? Lying to the FBI? Well so much for equal justice in this country, I guess. Yes, this nation has become a banana republic, hasn't it?
 
You are an unprincipled fool if you think that giving such a corrupt and irresponsible person such as Hillary even more power of office is the right thing to do.

Really you want to go with an unprincipled tool attack??
 
I want to see a consequence from this.

Is there anybody here that doesn't?

It just proves she is corrupt lying wench and hero of the dems/liberals. Yet I repeat myself.
 
Not many dems/libs here defending the indefensible. They are too busy making sure men can go into women's bathrooms.
 
Not many dems/libs here defending the indefensible. They are too busy making sure men can go into women's bathrooms.

Best place to be if you are straight and at a gay dance club on straight nite.
 
Wow, apparently she's been struggling with some pretty substantial neurological issues.

But vote for Hillary all the same

Yes, Secretary of State, can't remember being told about classified material, yet signed documents saying she understood her responsibilities and the consequences for not handling classified material properly. There aren't any good explanations for her behavior.
 
Really you want to go with an unprincipled tool attack??

Hillary, in her long career of public (*cough* self) service has proven herself to be a liar, dishonest, corrupt, unprincipled, amoral, ignorant of the law when it is convenient for her to be so as well as ignorant of any conflict of interest, when it is convenient for her to be so. So where in there is the makings of an "unprincipled tool attack" ?
 
Not many dems/libs here defending the indefensible. They are too busy making sure men can go into women's bathrooms.

We get bored with the same ol' nothingburgers the right wing slings around because they have nothing else. They have nothing positive to offer the nation--just tax cuts for the already rich, and hate and fear.

They just want to distract voters from their crazy, dangerous, racist demagogue candidate for president.

The documents show why the FBI didn't press charges. As Gertrude Stein wrote; "there is no 'there,' there."

Screenshot%2B2016-09-01%2Bat%2B12.58.37%2BPM.png
 
Last edited:
Hillary, in her long career of public (*cough* self) service has proven herself to be a liar, dishonest, corrupt, unprincipled, amoral, ignorant of the law when it is convenient for her to be so as well as ignorant of any conflict of interest, when it is convenient for her to be so. So where in there is the makings of an "unprincipled tool attack" ?

to be fair you called me an unprincipled fool. I'm a big boy so don't worry I'll not tell on you.
 
As a reasonable person given a binary choice of Trump or Clinton, I'll take Clinton EVERY time. Most if not all unreasonable people disagree.

That, in a nutshell, surmises what is wrong with the country. You'll take the unindicted felon every time.
 
Hillary, in her long career of public (*cough* self) service has proven herself to be a liar, dishonest, corrupt, unprincipled, amoral, ignorant of the law when it is convenient for her to be so as well as ignorant of any conflict of interest, when it is convenient for her to be so. So where in there is the makings of an "unprincipled tool attack" ?
.

In the words that you typed calling me a unprincipled fool?
 
Back
Top Bottom