- Joined
- Sep 13, 2007
- Messages
- 79,903
- Reaction score
- 20,981
- Location
- I love your hate.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Under McDonald he might well get a reversal. since NJ issues normal capacity (15-17) round magazines to their police officers, that state cannot be heard that such magazines are not common or normal which was the thrust of the Heller decision which was then applied via the 14th to the states
I think the guy should have been given some time to comply with the Jersey laws.
First, if you meant TROLL, you need to learn to either type better or spell better.
Second, I will quote you any way I want to quote as long as it is your words. If I only need a line I will copy and paste that line. If I want the whole thing, I will use the feature.
Third, you claiming to have provided evidence does not equate to providing evidence. When you make big boasts like the government has a problem and then fail to back it up with any statistics to show it and instead put the crap that you did there and even that contradicted your boast, it is you who look foolish.
You want to talk about somedoing doing damage and a disservice to gun owners? That would be you trying to take an isolated case involving a possible lousy judge and turning it into the current right wing cause celebre.
But please, be my guest. Just learn about evidence and supporting your claims and provide some.
If you notice, everyone else in this thread are enjoying conversation. we really don't need you and your tantrums here mucking up the thread with your typical trolling nonsense. have a nice day.
Because the NRA is a gutless "Rights" organization bent on compromise.
This is the insanity of hoplophobic gun grabbers. The likley outcome of the gun control lobby's policies.
This could happen to any of us in NJ. I hope Christie does the right thing here.
a magazine that holds 3 rounds more than allowed by law deserves jail time? really? 7 years? really?
Where did I say that?
Which is your way of saying "gee Haymarket,.
No d00d, it's actually my way of saying exactly what I said. :shrug:
Gee whiz, and here I was hoping for the actual statistical evidence of a government problem with guns that you promised pages ago.
what post did I promise YOU, anything? I don't negotiate with folks who troll and lie. sorry.impdaddy:
You should go back and look at your own posts.
#11 is where you claim that their is a "government problem" in New Jersey.
Then I asked you for evidence and you responded with post #15 in which you you attempted to present some - for lack of a better word - 'information' but it fell far short of making your case or backing your claim.
Nobody wants to negotiate with you. All anyone wants you to do is to back up your claims with appropriate documentation. I don't really care what names you call me or what excuses that you offer for failing to do that. The only important this is that you have no done it.
So you lied. I never promised you jack. Thanks for your concession. Are you done derailing this thread, Jack? :roll:
| Moderator's Warning: |
I am a life member. :yes:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?