Fact check on last Trump Administration

[bongsaway]

Every governor who shut down their economy. Every governor who KEPT their economy shut down.

You want names? Look up the names of every governor in 2020.

It's your witch hunt, you find them.

 

[Mycroft]

It's your witch hunt, you find them.

I've already found them and exposed them.

Look, you are starting to make silly comments and I'm getting bored.

You are dismissed.

 

[eman623]

How many jobs did the Trump Administration lose in total (4 years)?

How is this a US election topic?

 

[Lafayette]

Anyone that thinks one man controls the inflation of a country is an idiot, plain and simple.

Nobody "controls" inflation. It just happens to markets.

What can one do about it? Well, a government can interfere by means of the money-supply. From here: How Do Governments Reduce Inflation?

Excerpt:

One significant monetary way to curb Inflation is to control the money supply in the economy. If the money supply goes down, the demand for goods will reduce, causing a price fall. Another way to curb the money supply is when the government withdraws specific paper notes or coins from circulation.

So, who controls the money-supply? The Federal Reserve ...

 

[Lafayette]

How is this a US election topic?

The employment rate is far more important than the unemployment rate. And who calculates that rate? How do you calculate the rate of employment?

Employment rates are defined as a measure of the extent to which available labour resources (people available to work) are being used. The rates are calculated as the ratio of the employed to the working age population by the Bureau of Labor.

The employment rate is like the unemployment rate - it is just a calculation. But, the latter does affect peoples attitudes when voting. Because, We think the government is responsible for providing a low unemployment-rate.

Wrong! No law states that fact.

But, we have to blame somebody, don't we? And during election years many of the unemployed vote as a consequence of bad employment rates. They take their anger out on the PotUS. And what better moment to do that than an election-year ... ?

 

[eman623]

The employment rate is far more important than the unemployment rate. And who calculates that rate? How do you calculate the rate of employment?

Employment rates are defined as a measure of the extent to which available labour resources (people available to work) are being used. The rates are calculated as the ratio of the employed to the working age population by the Bureau of Labor.

The employment rate is like the unemployment rate - it is just a calculation. But, the latter does affect peoples attitudes when voting. Because, We think the government is responsible for providing a low unemployment-rate.

Wrong! No law states that fact.

But, we have to blame somebody, don't we? And during election years many of the unemployed vote as a consequence of bad employment rates. They take their anger out on the PotUS. And what better moment to do that than an election-year ... ?

Nice tapdance. This thread has tangential relevance to US elections ay best.

It's just an excuse to post yet another anti-Trump screed.

 

[Davin]

"But...but...OBAMA!!!"

You are dismissed.

Lol so you blame congress under trump’s spending but blame Obama instead of congress for spending under Obama. Sorry but it is you who are dismissed by your own hypocrisy and lying.

 

[Patriotic Voter]

Anyone that thinks one man controls the inflation of a country is an idiot, plain and simple.

And that idiot made an effort to be stupid about politics.

 

[Lafayette]

Make up your minds. You cons love to blame Obama for the debt until trump came along and said “hold my beer” and then you change it to congress is at fault. Why is it when a Republican is president you blame congress for the debt but when it is a democratic president you blame the president for the debt?

For centuries the name of the game in, a free multi-party governance of a nation, has been to sink the opposition into a pile of ridiculous horse-shat. This time, like last time, like history, elections are always about one side deprecating the other side.

Pathetically boring - but apparently there is no-other-way to perform their obligations in a two-party system with two separate governing chambers with a PotUS "having their say".

And I thought the European makeup of democracy was boringly complex - but Uncle Sam's version has cut my appetite for either party ...

 

[Lafayette]

Why is it when a Republican is president you blame congress for the debt but when it is a democratic president you blame the president for the debt?

Because is there anyone else to blame? Both parties think that smearing one other is the way to win an election. It isn't, but American voters put-up with it.

How boring can a political system get?

And when one reads about what-goes-on inside the discussion amongst the Congressional-participants it becomes even more hapless ...

 

[justabubba]

Nice tapdance. This thread has tangential relevance to US elections ay best.

It's just an excuse to post yet another anti-Trump screed.

And another opportunity for the MAGAts to prove said screed to be inaccurate

 

[EMNofSeattle]

How many jobs did the Trump Administration lose in total (4 years)?

This below from USA Today here: Fact check: Chart of job growth by president shows historic unemployment under Trump

Excerpt:



Yeah, go ahead! Tell me it isn't so! The last Trump-administration was a Jobs-Loser and with his billions he could not give a damn about unemployment ...

I was alive in America during the Trump admin, I know this is statistical ****ery and there’s no point even arguing it

 

[Lafayette]

Nice tapdance. This thread has tangential relevance to US elections ay best.

It's just an excuse to post yet another anti-Trump screed.

Try reading it - that helps form an opinion.

He's a witless twit politically. Like most billionaires he thinks every thing he does is right because he mad money. Which is the ONLY measure of success!

He proved to be hapless for four years in DC - and you want him back?

Wow ... !

 

[Lafayette]

THE SUPER-RICH IN AMERICA

Nice tapdance. This thread has tangential relevance to US elections ay best.

It's just an excuse to post yet another anti-Trump screed.

And people like you think he does not deserve the vitriolic-punishment he gets?

This guy has been fooling-around with legality since his birth. He just cannot accept to be told what to do and how to do it by someone else. Some say he got that from his German father - along with the $413M inheritance. (Yeah, Right! I'm just jealous!)

His political manner is totally unacceptable and his private manner is even worse. As well as his Political Outlook. He will do NOTHING to assure poorer Americans that they deserve a decent lifestyle even if poor. (He has no notion at all of what it is like to live in American poverty. It is beyond his comprehension.)

Vote for ash-hole and you are voting for the best interests of the super-rich - just like him ... !

PS: You don't want to believe comments about the American super-rich? Then have a look at this chart here. Top Ten Percent - and do notice that black-line at the very bottom. That is the lowest percentage of aggregate (total income).

 

[Lafayette]

THE SUPER-RICH IN AMERICA

.
.
.

PS: You don't want to believe comments about the American super-rich? Then have a look at this chart here. Top Ten Percent - and do notice that black-line at the very bottom. That is the lowest percentage of aggregate (total income).

In the above entries, I did not include the definition of Net Worth, which is the primary measure in the graphic.

Net Worth means this: The total wealth of an individual, company, or household, taking account of all financial assets and liabilities.

 

[Lafayette]

NET WORTH CHART OF US

.
.
In the above entries, I did not include the definition of Net Worth, which is the primary measure in the graphic.

Net Worth means this: The total wealth of an individual, company, or household, taking account of all financial assets and liabilities.

Oupps, could not put up the chart for Net Worth (it seems) as the image will not dislocate - so here is its address: https://www.statista.com/chart/19635/wealth-distribution-percentiles-in-the-us/

Especially, look at the very bottom "50%" of the image. It's a tiny horizontal black line at the very bottom of the chart but constitutes 50% of the population!

If that is not proof of Disgraceful Economic Sharing in the US, then I do not know what is ... !

 

[Lafayette]

Especially, look at the very bottom "50%" of the image. It's a tiny horizontal black line at the very bottom of the chart but constitutes 50% of the population!
If that is not proof of Disgraceful Economic Sharing in the US, then I do not know what is ... !

Here's the chart - I found it elsewhere ...

Do look above at that black line on the bottom. It designates the Total Wealth that goes to50% of the population!

Next time you see Donald Dork show it to him ... he won't understand a damn thing that chart says being born oblivious to the factual evidence ...