• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Explosive new revelations just weakened Trump’s impeachment defenses

Rogue Valley said:
Explosive new revelations just weakened Trump’s impeachment defenses

hqdefault.jpg




I hope the sham trial plans of Moscow Bitch McConnell blow up in his turtle face.

Related: Behind the Ukraine Aid Freeze: 84 Days of Conflict and Confusion
Click to expand...

Dummass democrat logic: 'We supported Obama's refusal to render military aid to Ukraine in their darkest hour of greatest need, but we totally condemn Trump for allegedly intending to hold back aid for a few weeks for the supposed purpose of looking into possible Biden corruption, which investigation democrats find to be inexcusable.'
 
marke said:
Dummass democrat logic: 'We supported Obama's refusal to render military aid to Ukraine in their darkest hour of greatest need, but we totally condemn Trump for allegedly intending to hold back aid for a few weeks for the supposed purpose of looking into possible Biden corruption, which investigation democrats find to be inexcusable.'
Click to expand...

Trump utilizing govt funding to manipulate the Ukrainians for his personal gain is unacceptable behavior.
 
Paradoxical said:
Just sayin. You are NOT a Libertarian. Perhaps you made a mistake and thought you said LIBERAL.
Click to expand...

Oh, sure. You know me. Thing is, I am a libertarian. I am against the government's intrusion on my rights, and believe in the rights of individuals throughout this country. However, I am not an authoritarian masquerading as a libertarian.

You?

Jury is still out...
 
bongsaway said:
Another misrepresentation of the truth. Mueller specifically pointed out what he thought were ten instances of obstruction of justice. He also said if his team and him had found any evidence the president committed no crimes, he would have reported that fact, he didn't.
Click to expand...

It's a cold day and you are in a hoody shopping for bongs and another guy with a hoody that looks a lot like you casually mentions that should buy a certain one and you engage in small talk until he goes off to the cash register presumably to pay. After a few minutes you hear someone saying this is a robbery and give me all your money. You hear this and see patrons and run out of the store and you follow. Within 5 minutes you getting home Ten cop cars surround your house and the Swat Team breaks down your door and arrests you because two witnesses gave perfect descriptions of you and the car and license number matching your car.

The store owner swore it was you as die the two witnesses. The cops admitted there was no gun found in your house or money but that you has time to stash it. the prosecution shows the court that you are over extended on credit card bills, your house payment, a school loan and you car is about to be repossessed.

After a lengthy trial, the verdict is not guilty and a poll of the jurors reports that you appeared to obstrust the police by not answering questions (because you were mad you were arrested and innocent), that you they could NOT find you INNOCENCT of the crime because you obstructed the investigation by jostling with a police officer, not voluntarily releasing your financial records and refusing a polygraph test, and resisted arrest
 
BlueTex said:
Where are you getting that it was an associate and not the whistleblower?

Edit: Never mind, I see where you are getting that... What would be unusual about a complaint being sent to the CIA general counsel to preserve anonymity?
Click to expand...

Since Trump knew 15 prople were there when he called he could hardly think he had to hide something
 
Obscurity said:
I'm nonplussed. Your argument is a hypothetical, since 2020 election has yet to be decided. Do you ever get tired of parroting propaganda?
Click to expand...

The Republicans are upset by your party trying to insult us and take away a great leader. You WILL pay a heavy, heavy price in loss of seats.
 
Obscurity said:
Awww, sorry people in this country are diverse, and want NOTHING to do with your sickening embrace of employer monarchy.
Click to expand...

You are worth no more that a wiling company is willing to pay you.
 
Paradoxical said:
Since Trump knew 15 prople were there when he called he could hardly think he had to hide something
Click to expand...


And yet he did hide the transcript and still has not released it.

One of the peices of evidence that he is illegally withholding...
 
US&THEM said:
How many persons need to be indicted before you understand they worked for Trump?
Click to expand...

What in Hades are you talking about? There were people indicted for things they did BEFORE they were hired by Trump and people indicted for things they did when they were employed by Trump but have nothing at all to do with Trump. And your point is......?
 
GDViking said:
And yet he did hide the transcript and still has not released it.

One of the peices of evidence that he is illegally withholding...
Click to expand...

He did more than any president would. He released the transcript.
 
Paradoxical said:
He did more than any president would. He released the transcript.
Click to expand...

Really when did he do that?

All we have seen so far is a memo that was put together by the Whitehouse, not the people on the call whose job it was to create the transcript.
 
GDViking said:
Really when did he do that?

All we have seen so far is a memo that was put together by the Whitehouse, not the people on the call whose job it was to create the transcript.
Click to expand...

Has anyone testified that there was something wrong with the transcript?

I swear. You guys have lived such an entitled life that you think you should be co-presidents like you imagined you were under Obama.
 
Paradoxical said:
What in Hades are you talking about? There were people indicted for things they did BEFORE they were hired by Trump and people indicted for things they did when they were employed by Trump but have nothing at all to do with Trump. And your point is......?
Click to expand...

Flynn? Papadopoulos? Manafort gave voting information to the Russians as he was the campaign manager, Gates? Your willful blindness to facts is scary.
 
US&THEM said:
Flynn? Papadopoulos? Manafort gave voting information to the Russians as he was the campaign manager, Gates? Your willful blindness to facts is scary.
Click to expand...

And.............? Please be specific as to what Pappy or Manny or Gates said or did that implicates Trump. Thanks for your anticipated cooperation.
 
Paradoxical said:
And.............? Please be specific as to what Pappy or Manny or Gates said or did that implicates Trump. Thanks for your anticipated cooperation.
Click to expand...

You ask a question I answer you ask another question ignoring the answers. They were working for Trump, that was your question. For a man who claims he only hires the best he has failed miserably.
 
US&THEM said:
You ask a question I answer you ask another question ignoring the answers. They were working for Trump, that was your question. For a man who claims he only hires the best he has failed miserably.
Click to expand...

Because you make no points. I'm trying to understand the underlying point you are trying to make. is it that they are all males?
 
Paradoxical said:
Because you make no points. I'm trying to understand the underlying point you are trying to make. is it that they are all males?
Click to expand...

The main point is you ignore facts because it messes up your Trump reality. The new email release today show everyone in a panic due to Trump’s lack of honesty and candor.

The persons who are willing to currently work for this admin are damaged goods.
 
Paradoxical said:
Has anyone testified that there was something wrong with the transcript?

I swear. You guys have lived such an entitled life that you think you should be co-presidents like you imagined you were under Obama.
Click to expand...

As a co-equal branch of government, congress is ENTITLED to the transcript and/or the testimony of those who were on the call. Why is the president OBSTRUCTING this testimony?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom